Trends in Cervical Cytology Screening and Reporting Practices: Results From the College of American Pathologists 2011 PAP Education Supplemental Questionnaire (original) (raw)
Related papers
… of pathology & …, 2010
Context.-Liquid-based preparations (LBPs) and human papillomavirus testing have led to changes in cervical cytology practices. The College of American Pathologists attempts to track practice patterns using a supplemental questionnaire, which allows laboratories to report diagnostic practices. Objective.-To analyze the 2006 reporting practices and to compare the results with the 2003 survey data. Design.-Questionnaire was mailed to 1621 laboratories. Participants included laboratories enrolled in the 2006 College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Proficiency Testing Program or the educational Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Gynecologic Cytology. Results.-Of the 679 responding laboratories (response rate, 42%), most (97.8%; n = 664) had implemented the Bethesda 2001 terminology. The median rate for all preparations with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions was 2.5% (2.9% for LBPs) compared with a 2003 median rate of 2.1%; the increase was confined to LBPs. Rates for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (median, 0.5%) and atypical squamous cells have changed little. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and unsatisfactory rates varied at statistically significant levels between types of LBPs. Most atypical squamous cell cases were subclassified as undetermined significance (median, 4.3%). The median ratio of atypical squamous cells to squamous intraepithelial lesions and carcinomas for all specimen types combined was 1.5, similar to the 2003 median ratio of 1.4. The median rates for findings of squamous cell abnormalities for 2006 were significantly higher for LBPs than for conventional smears. Conclusions.-Most responding laboratories have implemented the Bethesda 2001 terminology. There is an increase in LBP low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion rates when compared with 2003 data. Liquid-based preparations have higher median squamous intraepithelial lesion and atypical squamous cell rates.
Diagnostic Cytopathology, 2012
A rapid prescreening or rapid rescreening method for quality assurance in cervical cytology has been used in Europe and in Canada but has not been accepted in the United States. The rapid prescreen method was tested in a cytology laboratory that serves an academic medical center with a high-risk population for cervical cancer. For a period of 3 months, a tray of 20 sequentially numbered Surepath™ liquid-based preparations, randomly selected from the cervical cytology daily workload, were each prescreened in a random fashion for 1 minute. Experienced cytotechnologists performed the rapid prescreen. Results were recorded as negative, further review needed, or epithelial cell abnormality, category specified. The 20 cervical cytology preparations were then replaced in their same position in the daily workload for routine screening performed by another cytotechnologist. Final interpretation was by a cytopathologist as requested or required by Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988. The rapid prescreen data was tabulated and compared with data for a similar time period using the laboratory's normal quality assurance program. Seven hundred and twelve cases underwent rapid prescreen. Six hundred and forty-two were interpreted as negative. Twenty-six cases were interpreted as low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LGSIL) or higher. Forty-four cases were classified as needing further review. For the 642 negative cases by rapid prescreening, routine screening reported 537 as negative and 105 as either abnormal or needed cytopathologist review. The error rate for the rapid prescreen is 50 of 712 (7.0%); for LGSIL and above 19 of 712 (2.6%). Of the 105 abnormal cases or those submitted for cytopathologist review, 31 were interpreted as atypical squamous cells of undermined significance (ASCUS), 41 cases as reactive/repair, 17 as LGSIL, 4 as unsatisfactory, 1 as atypical squamous cells, cannot rule out high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H), 8 as the presence of endometrial cells in a women aged >40, 1 as malignant melanoma, and 2 as within normal limits with the presence of Actinomyces. The laboratory's routine quality assurance program selects cases, 10% of initially interpreted negative cases plus any gynecologic cytology on patients with a prior abnormal cervical cytology, or history of cervical epithelial cell abnormality. This quality assurance program averages 29% of cases, 4,045 of a total of 13,767, in 2008. Thirty-seven (0.9%) cases were detected in this rescreen (ASCUS, 16 cases; LGSIL, 13 cases; 1 high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; 4 ASC-H; and 3 atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance). Eliminating ASCUS cases, eight significant cases were detected, with an error rate of 0.2%. In this cytology laboratory, the rapid prescreen did not prove as reliable as routine quality assurance program for cervical cytology cases.
BMC Clinical Pathology
Background: Cervical cancer can be prevented by early detection and treatment for precancerous lesions. Since 1995, there has been a national cervical cancer screening program in Norway, where women aged 25-69 years are recommended to take Pap smears every three years. There are 17 cytology laboratories covering a population of 5 million people. The detection rate of cervical abnormalities varies from laboratory to laboratory. We wanted to investigate the accuracy of cytology diagnoses by four different pathologists at three different hospitals in Norway. Methods: One hundred Pap smears (20 Normal, 20 ASC-US, 20 LSIL, 20 ASC-H and 20 HSIL) screened at UNN in 2015 were evaluated by four pathologists at three hospitals in Norway. All patients were followed up through December 2016. Histologically confirmed high-grade dysplasia (CIN2+) was considered as study endpoint. Results: The number of Pap smears evaluated as abnormal (ASC-US+) by the four pathologists varied from 61 to 85. The number of high-grade cytology (ASC-H+) varied from 26 to 50. There was moderate agreement (weighted kappa 0.45-0. 58) between the observers. There were 32 women with high-grade histology (CIN2+) in the follow-up, including 19 CIN2, 12 CIN3 and one squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Using high-grade cytology (ASC-H+) as cutoff , the sensitivity for CIN2+ varied from 68.8% to 93.8% (mean 77.4%) and specificity from 70.6% to 95.6% (mean 81.3%). The pathologist with the highest sensitivity for CIN2+ had the highest false positive rate and the lowest specificity (p<0.05). The accuracy for CIN2+ varied from 74.1% to 83.8% (mean 79.4%). The Pap smear from the woman with cervical cancer was diagnosed as high-grade (ASC-H+) by one of the four pathologists. Conclusions: Cervical cancer screening based on cytology has limited accuracy. The study revealed a moderate agreement between the observers, along with a trade-off between sensitivity and specificity. This might indicate that hospitals with high detection rates of cervical cytology have higher sensitivity for CIN2+ but lower specificity.
Cytopathology, 2006
Rapid cervicovaginal smear screening: method of quality control and assessing individual cytotechnologist performance Aim: To validate the method of rapid screening (RS) in the detection of cervical lesions and false-negative results as well as in quality control of cytotechnologist performance. Material and methods: The RS method was validated on Papanicolaou-stained and initially conventionally analysed vaginal, cervical and endocervical (VCE) smears collected in an opportunistic programme for the detection of cervical carcinoma. The study included 3680 VCE smears from the . Histologically verified abnormal findings accounted for 10% of the study samples. Thirteen cytotechnologists, with no previous experience in RS, performed the test. Each slide was examined using the ÔstepÕ technique for 1.5 minutes, the findings were classified as negative or abnormal, and the abnormal ones were also classified according to differential cytological diagnosis. The results were compared with those obtained on initial screening. Abnormal findings from a group of initially negative findings were reanalysed using conventional methods to make definitive cytological diagnosis. Results: RS yielded a sensitivity of 83.7%, specificity of 93.7%, positive predictive value of 62.4%, negative predictive value of 97.9% and diagnostic accuracy of 92.6%. Relative to the initial abnormal differential cytological diagnosis, the diagnostic value of RS increased with lesion severity [54.8%, 68.0% and 91.3% for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) I, CIN II and CIN III respectively]. RS detected 38 additional positive findings; 94.2% of these were atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS)/abnormal glandular cells undetermined significance (AGUS) and CIN I. The rate of additional positive findings was 1.14% (38/3135). The falsenegative rate of initial screening was 9.4% (38/406), and individual cytotechnologist sensitivity was 60.0-100.0%. Conclusion: RS could be introduced as an efficient method of quality control to improve the sensitivity of cytological screening as well as for quality control of cytotechnologist performance.
Diagnostic Cytopathology, 2016
Background: This study assessed the effects of a continued education program on the agreement between cervical cytopathology exams interpreted by local laboratories and interpretation made by an external quality control laboratory (LabMEQ). Methods: Overall, 9,798 exams were analyzed between 2007 and 2008, prior to implementation of a continued education program, and 10,028 between 2010 and 2011, following implementation. Continued education consisted of theoretical and practical classes held every two months. The chi-square test and the kappa coefficient were used in the statistical analysis. Results: Following implementation of continued education, the rate of false-negative results, and those leading to delays in clinical management fell in eight laboratories and the rate of false-positive results in five. Agreement between the results reported by the laboratories and the findings of LabMEQ, evaluated according to clinical management, remained excellent in three laboratories (kappa >0.80 and <1.0), went from good (kappa >0.60 and <0.80) to excellent in seven and from excellent to good in two. Agreement regarding the identification of metaplastic epithelium was poor (kappa 5 0.25) but progressed to excellent following the implementation of continued education (kappa 5 0.950). Agreement between cytopathology results improved significantly following implementation of continued education in cases reported as unsatisfactory (P < 0.001), atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (P < 0.001), lowgrade squamous intraepithelial lesion (P < 0.001), and glandular atypia (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Continued education contributed towards improving the reproducibility of cervical cytopathology, decreased the rates of false-negative and false-positive results, and reduced delays in clinical management.
Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, 2001
In 1997, the American Society of Cytopathology (ASC) President charged two committees, the Cytopathology Practice Committee and the Quality Assurance Committee, to create a practice guideline for cervical cytology. The charge was to address technical, interpretive, information management, quality control and quality assurance, documentation, and medico-legal aspects of cervical cytology. These committees were composed of experienced and expert cytologists who enlisted the expertise and knowledge of others to help them produce a complete and helpful resource. The composition of the group reflected a broad cross-section of cytology practices, including cytopathologists and cytotechnologists from small, medium, and large hospital laboratories, as well as representatives from large-scale commercial laboratories.
Results of a control quality strategy in cervical cytology
Einstein (São Paulo), 2012
To determine the efficacy of a quality control strategy in cervical cytology in the detection of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. methods: Forty-two patients were selected who underwent a Pap smear and cervical uterine biopsy between April 2008 and December 2009, with evidence of a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in one or both tests. The statistical parameters of the smear test were calculated before and after systematic meetings for review of the archived test results (6 years), in which the following was done: interobserver diagnostic consensus; cytohistological correlation, with the latter as gold standard; and evaluation of the therapeutic status of each patient. Results: Once these controls were applied, it was noted that sensitivity and positive likelihood ratio of the test for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion increased 9.5% (34.5 to 44%) and 0.45% (1.64 to 2.09%), respectively, while specificity remained at 79%. Reduction in interference of false-negative results associated with errors in the analytical phase of the cytological productive process gave an estimate of failures in collection of the specimens (pre-analytical phase). conclusion: In addition to improving the performance of the cytological diagnosis of the high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, the proposed quality control strategy allows a reflection on the causes of incorrect or conflicting scrutiny.
Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine, 2004
The 2001 Bethesda System for the reporting of cervical cytology specimens and the use of new liquid-based and human papillomavirus testing technologies have led to changes in cervical cytology reporting practices. To analyze current laboratory reporting practices using Bethesda 2001 terminology and to compare results with previous survey data from 1996. Questionnaire survey mailed to 1751 laboratories in mid-2003. Laboratories enrolled in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology. Of the 759 responding laboratories, most (85.5%) had implemented Bethesda 2001 terminology, and the majority had adopted major changes, such as elimination of the benign cellular changes category and the satisfactory but limited category. The median reporting rate for low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion was 2.1%, compared to a 1996 median rate of 1.6%, but the increase was confined to liquid-based preparations. Reporting rates for high-grade sq...
The 2001 Bethesda SystemTerminology for Reporting Results of Cervical Cytology
JAMA, 2002
for the Forum Group Members and the Bethesda 2001 Workshop BACKGROUND The Bethesda System for reporting the results of cervical cytology was developed as a uniform system of terminology that would provide clear guidance for clinical management. 1 The first workshop was held in 1988, to reduce widespread confusion among laboratories and clinicians created by the use of multiple classification systems and inconsistently defined numerical grading conventions. The most important contribution of the Bethesda System was the creation of a standardized framework for laboratory reports that included a descriptive diagnosis and an evaluation of specimen adequacy. While not everyone agreed with every detail of that initial effort, the recommendations of the 1988 workshop received widespread acceptance in practice. 2 A second workshop was held in 1991 to modify the Bethesda System based on actual laboratory and clinical experience after its implementation. 3 Currently, more than 90% of US laboratories use some form of the 1991 Bethesda System in reporting cervical cytology. 4 With the increased utilization of new technologies and recent findings from research studies, 2001 was considered an opportune time to reevaluate the Bethesda System.
External Quality Control of Cervical Cytopathology: Interlaboratory Variability
Acta Cytologica, 2013
Objective: To compare the variability of screening tests held at laboratories with the Unit for External Quality Control (UEQC), checking the frequency of cases that were discordant, false-positive, false-negative, unsatisfactory or that had a delay in clinical management and diagnostic agreement. Materials and Methods: The study analyzed 10,053 screening tests from January 2007 to December 2008, including all positive cases, all those that fall under unsatisfactory and at least 10% of negative screening tests. The magnitude of the agreement was analyzed using the kappa coefficient. Results: Out of the 10,053 cases analyzed, 7.59% were considered disagreeing, and it was estimated that 1.1% were false-negative. There was a delay in the clinical procedure regarding 2.44% cases. There were 2.82% of cases identified as false-positive and 1.24% as unsatisfactory. The diagnostic agreement was excellent (kappa = 0.81). The agreement of most laboratories concerning screening tests was class...