Kondo Screening and Magnetism at Interfaces (original) (raw)

Abstract

The nature of magnetic order and transport properties near surfaces is a topic of great current interest. Here we model metal-insulator interfaces with a multi-layer system governed by a tightbinding Hamiltonian in which the interaction is non-zero on one set of adjacent planes and zero on another. As the interface hybridization is tuned, magnetic and metallic properties undergo an evolution that reflects the competition between anti-ferromagnetism and (Kondo) singlet formation in a scenario similar to that occurring in heavy-fermion materials. For a few-layer system at intermediate hybridization, a Kondo insulating phase results where magnetic order and conductivity are suppressed in all layers. As more insulating layers are added, magnetic order is restored in all correlated layers except that at the interface. Residual signs of Kondo physics are however evident in the bulk as a substantial reduction of the order parameter in the 2-3 layers immediately adjacent to the interfacial one. We find no signature of long range magnetic order in the metallic layers.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (22)

  1. A. Liebsch, Phys. Rev. B70, 165103 (2004).
  2. R. Arita and K. Held, Phys. Rev. B72, 201102(R) (2005).
  3. J. Mannhart, in Thin Films and Heterostructures for Oxide Electronics, S. Ogale, Ed. (Springer, New York, 2005), pp. 251-278.
  4. J. Mannhart and D.G. Schlom, Science 327, 1607 (2010).
  5. J.K. Freericks, Transport in Multilayered Nanostructures: The Dynamical Mean Field Theory Approach (Imperial College Press, London, 2006).
  6. A. Millis, in Thin Films and Heterostructures for Oxide Electronics, S. Ogale, Ed. (Springer, New York, 2005), pp. 279-297.
  7. H.Y. Hwang, S.-W. Cheong, N.P. Ong, and B. Battlogg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2041 (1996).
  8. J. Chakhalian et al. Nat. Phys. 2,244 (2006).
  9. K. Munakata, T.H. Geballe, and M.R. Beasley, Phys. Rev. B 84, 161405(R) (2011).
  10. A. Sherman and N. Voropajeva, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 24, 979 (2010).
  11. R. W. Helmes, T. A. Costi and A. Rosch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 066802 (2008)
  12. Of course in the case where l is interpreted as a band index the physically interesting choice of t ll ′ would dif- fer from that chosen here, where only 'adjacent' layers l are hybridized. Even more significantly, the Hamiltonian would likely contain more general (Hund's Rule) interac- tions.
  13. R. Blankenbecler, R.L. Sugar, and D.J. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. D24, 2278 (1981).
  14. J.E. Gubernatis, M. Jarrell, R.N. Silver, and D.S. Sivia, Phys. Rev. B44, 6011 (1991).
  15. C. Gros, Z. Phys. B 86, 359 (1992)
  16. M. Randeria, N. Trivedi, A. Moreo, and R. T. Scalet- tar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2001 (1992);
  17. N. Trivedi and M. Randeria, ibid. 75, 312 (1995).
  18. D. A. Huse, Phys. Rev. B 37, 2380 (1988).
  19. M. Vekic, J.W. Cannon, D.J. Scalapino, R.T. Scalettar, and R.L. Sugar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2367 (1995).
  20. R.T. Scalettar, J.W. Cannon, D.J. Scalapino, and R.L. Sugar, Phys. Rev. B50, 13419 (1994).
  21. B. Sinkovic, B. Hermsmeierm, and C.S. Fadley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1227 (1985).
  22. S. B. Bacci, E.R. Gagliano, R.M. Martin, and J.F. An- nett, Phys. Rev. B 44, 7504 (1991).