The fourth age of political communication: Democratic decay or the rise of phronetic political communication? (original) (raw)

Abstract

In the fourth season of the television-drama “House of Cards” digitization plays a vital role for the political communication with the public as well as the struggle between the political opponents involved in the presidential election campaign. “House of Cards” presents a rather dystopic scenario, where policy professionals help resourceful political actors to hijack and manipulate the public debate.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (33)

  1. Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? the changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58, 707-731.
  2. Bennett, W. L., & Manheim, J. B. (2006). The one-step flow of communication. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 608(1), 213-232.
  3. Binderkrantz, A. S., Christiansen, P. M., & Pedersen, H. H. (2015). Interest group access to the bureaucracy, parliament, and the media. [ ] Governance, 28(1), 95-112,.
  4. Blach-Ørsten, M. (2016). Politikkens medialisering -et ny-institutionelt perspektiv. In S. Hjarvad (Ed.), [Medialisering. Mediernes rolle i social og kulturel forandring.] (pp. 185-215). Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels forlag.
  5. Blumer, J. G. (2013). The fourth age of political communication. Workshop on Political Communication, the Free University of Berlin, September 12, 2013: Blumer, Jay G. doi:http://www.fgpk.de/en/2013/gastbeitrag-von-jay-g-blumler-the-fourth-age-of-political-co mmunication-2/
  6. Esmark, A. (2012). Professionel politisk kommunikation i det lokale -en ny ledelsesudfordring? In J. Torfing (Ed.), Ledelse efter kommunalreformen -sådan tackles de nye udfordringer. (2nd ed., pp. 193-220). København: Jurist-og Økonomforbundets forlag.
  7. Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Making organization research matter. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. Lawrence & W. R. Nord (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organization studies. (pp. 370-387). London: SAGE Publications.
  8. Friedland, R., & Alford R. (1991). Bringing society back: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions In W. W. Powell, & P. DiMaggio J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232-266) The Fourth Age of Political Communication: Democratic decay or the rise of phronetic political communication? University of Chicago Press.
  9. Hegelund, S., & Mose, P. (2014). Lobbyistens lommebog -politikere under pres. København: Gyldendal.
  10. Hjarvad, S. (Ed.). (2016). Medialisering. mediernes rolle i social og kulturel forandring. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels forlag.
  11. Kahneman, D., & Klein, G. (2009). Conditions for intuitive expertise. A failure to disagree. American Psychologist, 64(5), 515-526.
  12. Küpers, W. M., & Pauleen, D. (2015 (online version)). Learning wisdom: Embodied and artiful approaches to management education. Scandinavian Journal of Management, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2015.08.003
  13. March, J. G. (1991). Social science and the myth of rationality. University of California: Speech at the School of Social Sciences, University of California.
  14. Marsh, D., & Fawcett, P. (2011). Branding, politics and democracy. Policy Studies, 32(5), 515-530.
  15. Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). BIG DATA. A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Boston -New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
  16. Mazzoleni, G., & Schulz, W. (1999). "Mediatization" of politics: A challenge for democracy? Political Communication, 16, 247-261.
  17. McGrath, C., Moss, D., & Harris, P. (2010). The evolving discipline of public affairs. Journal of Public Affairs, 10, 335-352.
  18. Merkelsen, H. (2007). Magt og medier. en introduktion. Frederiksberg: Forlaget Samfundslitteratur.
  19. Meyer, R. E., & Hammerschmid, G. (2006). Changing institutional logics and executive identities: A managerial challenge to public administration. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 1000.
  20. Moss, D., McGrath, C., Tonge, J., & Harris, P. (2012). Exploring the management of the corporate public affairs function in a dynamic global environment. Journal of Public Affairs, 12(1), 47-50. The Fourth Age of Political Communication: Democratic decay or the rise of phronetic political communication?
  21. Nickerson, D. W., & Rogers, T. (2014). Political campaigns and big data. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(2), 51-73.
  22. Nielsen, K., & Pedersen, O. K. (1989). Fra blandingsøkonomi til forhandlingsøkonomi. mod et nyt paradigme? In K. K. Klausen, & T. H. Nielsen (Eds.), Stat og marked -fra leviathan og usynlig hånd til forhandlingsøkonomi () Jurist-og Økonomforbundets Forlag.
  23. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (2011). The big idea: The wise leader. Harvard Business Review,
  24. Olsen, J. P. (2006). Maybe it is time to rediscover bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 1-24.
  25. Pache, A., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455-476.
  26. Pedersen, J. S., & Aagaard, P. (2015). Er du dirigent eller dukke? leder i en reformtid. København: Gyldendal.
  27. Pedersen, O. K. (2006). Corporatisme and beyond: The negotiated economy. In J. Campbell, J. Hall & O. K. Pedersen (Eds.), National identity and the varieties of capitalisme: The danish experience ()
  28. Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30(06), 629.
  29. Smith, B. (2015). Embedsmanden i det moderne folkestyre. Denmark: Jurist-og Økonomforbundets forlag.
  30. Strömbäck, J. (2008). Four phases of mediatization: An analysis of the mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13, 228.
  31. Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  32. Tynell, J. (2014). Mørkelygten. embedsmaend fortaeller om politisk tilskaering af tal, jura og fakta. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.
  33. Whelan, C. (2012). Big data and the democratisation of decisions. The Economist. The Fourth Age of Political Communication: Democratic decay or the rise of phronetic political communication?