Smart mischief: an attempt to demystify the Smart Cities craze in India (original) (raw)

Abstract

This paper attempts to demystify and deconstruct the current Smart Cities craze in India. It does so by refusing to be distracted by the discourses of the Smart Cities idea in general and of the Smart Cities Mission of the Government of India in particular. It focuses instead on the privatized physical spaces of urban inequality in India, specifically gated neighbourhoods and integrated townships. It argues that just as these privatized spaces have increased in size and complexity over time, their corresponding legitimizing ideologies have also evolved and become more sophisticated, to finally give birth to their newest avatar-Smart Cities. Seen in this light, Smart Cities appear less as a novel idea floated to guide the sustainable development of our future cities, and more as an ideological cover for the ongoing processes of neoliberal urbanization. The paper buttresses these arguments with an analysis of the design process of integrated township projects that I have been involved in, comparing the essential characteristics of these projects with the operational aspects and components of the Smart Cities Mission. KeywordS housing / Indian cities / inequality / integrated townships / Kolkata / neoliberal urbanization / Smart Cities I. deConStruCtIng A ConCeptuAl AppArAtuS In his insightful analysis of neoliberalism, David Harvey wrote that "for any way of thought to become dominant, a conceptual apparatus has to be advanced that appeals to our intuitions and instincts, to our values and our desires, as well as the possibilities inherent in the social world we inhabit". (1) Perhaps, apart from appealing to our "intuitions and instincts", a "conceptual apparatus" should also strive to reach a level where it can simultaneously shape, obfuscate and take over an entire way of thought, and channel it towards particular socioeconomic and class interests. Incidentally, Harvey has discussed this aspect too, not while discussing the "conceptual apparatus" but while elaborating the characteristics of counter-revolutionary theory, which he described as follows: "A theory which may or may not appear grounded in the reality it seeks to portray, but which obscures, be-clouds and generally obfuscates (either by design or accident) our ability to comprehend that reality. Such a theory is usually attractive and hence gains currency because Antarin Chakrabarty is State Coordination Manager at the Centre for urban and regional excellence (Cure), a nongovernmental organization based in delhi and bhubaneswar, India.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (18)

  1. theodore, nik (2014), Neoliberal Urbanism, youtube, 31 January, accessed 5 March 2018 at https://youtu.be/ POQ4IlE9fDQ?t=417.
  2. Swyngedouw, E, F Moulaert and A rodriguez (2002), "neoliberal urbanization in Europe: large-scale urban development projects and the new urban policy", Antipode Vol 34, no 3, pages 542-577, page 567, accessed 14 March 2017 at http://www. scholars-on-bilbao.info/fichas/ antipodeArodriguez.pdf.
  3. Sainath, P (2016), Politically Free, Imprisoned by Profit, 22nd Safdar hashmi Memorial Lecture, youtube, 27 October, accessed 7 March 2018 at https://youtu.be/nq-bbDw2r- y?t=112.
  4. American Planning Association (2017), Bhubaneswar Smart City Plan, accessed 30 October 2017 at http://www.planning.org.
  5. Bhubaneswar Smart City Limited (n.d.), Area Based Development, accessed 19 February 2018 at https://www.smartcitybhubaneswar.org.in.
  6. Dutta, A (2015), "A 100 smart cities, a 100 utopias", Dialogues in Human Geography Vol 5, No 1, pages 49-53, accessed 14 March 2017 at http://journals. sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2043820614565750.
  7. Gera, K (2008), "Special residential zones: a viable and compelling solution to India's affordable housing crisis", accessed 14 March 2017 at https:// www.scribd.com/document/6233893/Special- Residential-Zones-Srz-Concept-Note.
  8. Harvey, D (1988), Social Justice and the City, Basil Blackwell.
  9. Harvey, D (2007), A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford University Press.
  10. Harvey, D (2016), David Harvey on Post-neoliberalism, Trump, Infrastructure, Sharing Economy, Smart City, Interview by Evgeny Morozov, YouTube, 15 November, accessed 5 March 2018 at https:// youtu.be/wb6rhHyJJ_4.
  11. Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (2017), Smart Cities Mission, accessed 30 October 2017 at http:// smartcities.gov.in.
  12. Patel, S B (2011), "Inclusionary housing", Economic and Political Weekly Vol XLVI, No 43, pages 13-14.
  13. Sainath, P (2016), Politically Free, Imprisoned by Profit, 22nd Safdar Hashmi Memorial Lecture, YouTube, 27 October, accessed 7 March 2018 at https:// youtu.be/Nq-bBDw2r-Y.
  14. Sampath, G (2016), "Fooled by smartness", The Hindu, 28 July.
  15. Swyngedouw, E, F Moulaert and A Rodriguez (2002), "Neoliberal urbanization in Europe: large-scale urban development projects and the new urban policy", Antipode Vol 34, No 3, pages 542-577, accessed 14 March 2017 at http://www.scholars-on-bilbao.info/fichas/ antipodeARodriguez.pdf.
  16. The Hindu (2016), "Smart cities: What are they?", 24 May. The Indian Express (2017a), "Mapping expenditure: 80% Smart City funds for just 2.7% of the city area", 14 June.
  17. The Indian Express (2017b), "Smart City Project: We start small so that it can be replicated, says govt", 14 June.
  18. Theodore, Nik (2014), Neoliberal Urbanism, YouTube, 31 January, accessed 5 March 2018 at https:// youtu.be/POQ4IlE9fDQ.