Continuation of the ILO Principles in the 21st Century Through the Compliance Pull of Core Labor Rights (original) (raw)
Related papers
Studia z zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Społecznej
In 2020, for the first time in the history of the International Labour Organization (ILO), we sighted the universal ratification of a Convention, that is, the ratification by all 187 Member States of the Organization. The C182—Convention of Worst Forms of Child Labour (1999) is identified as a fundamental Convention because it refers to one of the fundamental labour rights identified at ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (1998). This Declaration, despite having been immersed in intense debates on the regulatory option adopted by the ILO (soft law), spelled out a list of fundamental rights and principles at work, approaching to the grammar of human rights. In this sense, it is possible to understand that Convention No. 182, since it is fundamental, already had a prominent role. However, universal ratification presents itself as opportune and strategic, especially when it formalizes the commitment of States to the observance of the parameters presented in the...
Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 2019
This article analyzes the scope and content of the International Labour Organization’s fundamental labour standards and tracks the way in which they are increasingly included and applied in the context of different international instruments with a public, private, binding, or voluntary character. The contemporary proliferation of these standards can lead to improved protection of workers’ rights. Nevertheless, the fragmentation and diversification of instruments may also include a risk of incoherent application. Securing fundamental labour standards—the prohibition of child labour, the prohibition of forced labour, non-discrimination and equal treatment, and freedom of association and the right to collective bargaining—is immensely important for vulnerable groups that are affected by the negative effects of economic globalization. This article charts the diversity of instruments and their relation to human rights law. Furthermore, it provides an examination of the different supervis...
This paper discusses how the ILO reacted to the challenges to its raison d’être posed by the end of the Cold War and the new globalization era. It shows that its continued relevance was attained in three main stages: the adoption of the 1998 Declaration, the development of the “decent work” concept and the adoption of the 2008 Declaration. The paper examines the Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, its adoption, its logic, achievements and limitations. It then discusses the definition and the promotion of the “decent work” concept, and its inclusion in the UN system and the international arena. Thereafter, it covers the 2008 Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair Globalization, the intricate process towards its adoption, its objectives, principles and potential. Finally, the paper shows how the ILO has reinforced the notion of “social justice” as a central aim of national and international policies.
International Labour Rights: Legitimising the International Legal Order?
This paper considers the role of international labour rights in an era of globalisation. It begins from Patrick Macklem's definition of that role in terms of providing the international legal order with a measure of normative legitimacy. It then interrogates the relationship between sovereignty and international labour rights in an era of globalization, highlighting the particular significance, in this context, of the voluntary surrender by nation states of elements of their sovereignty. It questions whether Macklem has given due consideration to this phenomenon, and to its consequences for the rights and interests of workers; whether, therefore, he has succeeded in providing an account of international labour rights that is at once descriptive and normative, as he intends it to be. Having drawn attention to the limitations of international labour rights, the paper concludes by commenting briefly on the desirability of a body of transnational labour law, of which international labour law would form only one part.
Human Rights and Workers: Limits to the International Labor Law
International journal of law and society, 2021
This article intends to provide an overview of the role of International Labor Law in the defense of Labor rights. In short, the present paper aims to analyze the meaning of the International Labor Law and the social rights stated as fundamental rights by International Labor Organization-ILO within the human rights and globalization context. The constitutionalization of social rights represented a normative advance in the social rights. Adopting the historical perspective of evaluation, one defends the relevancy of the human rights notion to the social rights notion. From a globalization perspective, in which the national states lose power, a worldwide social declaration rekindles debates over the value of labor in the society, the theories of justice that justify it, and over the effectiveness and financing of these social rights. This study is divided into two chapters. The first one views an overall notion of human and social rights, the evolution of the international labor law and its linkage to the human rights. From the premises it is important to define which fundamental human rights model is implied in the ILO declaration of 1998. The second chapter points out the political, economical, juridical e cultural limits to the connection between the International Labor Law and the human rights over a critical view.
The International Labour Organization (ILO) in Past and Present Research
International Review of Social History, 2008
This article addresses from a multidisciplinary perspective key questions, trends, and debates that have determined how the history of the International Labour Organization (ILO) has been conceived over the past ninety years. ILO historiography has to be understood in relation to the historical development of the ILO as an institution; the international political, economic, and social context; and the developments within the scientific discipline, especially the fields of (a globalizing) labour history and international relations/organizations. A starting point for this survey essay is the central hypothesis that the scientific interest in the history of international organizations is very much related to the general importance attached to multilateral structures and the belief in the effectiveness of international cooperation. Based on this analysis of the past trends and the current state of the field, I conclude with comments on lacunae and possible paths for future research on ILO history.