Burden of Endometriosis: Infertility, Comorbidities, and Healthcare Resource Utilization (original) (raw)
Related papers
Value in Health, 2011
background: This study aimed to calculate costs and health-related quality of life of women with endometriosis-associated symptoms treated in referral centres. methods: A prospective, multi-centre, questionnaire-based survey measured costs and quality of life in ambulatory care and in 12 tertiary care centres in 10 countries. The study enrolled women with a diagnosis of endometriosis and with at least one centre-specific contact related to endometriosis-associated symptoms in 2008. The main outcome measures were health care costs, costs of productivity loss, total costs and quality-adjusted life years. Predictors of costs were identified using regression analysis.
Middle East Fertility Society Journal
Background Endometriosis-related infertility is a disease associated with significant morbidity and distress to the couple and requires timely, multidisciplinary, and often high-cost care involving assisted reproductive technologies (ART). Many health care systems in the Middle East do not provide coverage for ART. This study aims to describe the reproductive outcome in a form of a clinical pregnancy rate in women with endometriosis-related infertility in a health care system that does not provide coverage for ART. Results This is a retrospective observational cohort study on women who attended the gynecology clinic in a tertiary center in Oman with the diagnosis of endometriosis from January 2011 to December 2019. Women of reproductive age seeking pregnancy were included in the analysis. Out of total women with endometriosis, (144/262) 55.0% were included in the analysis with a mean age of 31.10 ± 5.73 years. The mean duration of follow-up was 30.18 months and 43/144 (29.9%) of our...
Endometriosis: cost estimates and methodological perspective
Human Reproduction Update, 2007
This article aims to provide a systematic review of estimates and methodology of studies quantifying the costs of endometriosis. Included studies were cost-of-illness analyses quantifying the economic impact of endometriosis and cost analyses calculating diagnostic and treatment costs of endometriosis. Annual healthcare costs and costs of productivity loss associated with endometriosis have been estimated at 2801and2801 and 2801and1023 per patient, respectively. Extrapolating these findings to the US population, this study calculated that annual costs of endometriosis attained $22 billion in 2002 assuming a 10% prevalence rate among women of reproductive age. These costs are considerably higher than those related to Crohn's disease or to migraine. To date, it is not possible to determine whether a medical approach is less expensive than a surgical approach to treating endometriosis in patients presenting with chronic pelvic pain. Evidence of endometriosis costs in infertile patients is largely lacking. Cost estimates were biased due to the absence of a control group of patients without endometriosis, inadequate consideration of endometriosis recurrence and restricted scope of costs. There is a need for more and better-designed studies that carry out longitudinal analyses of patients until the cessation of their symptoms or that model the chronic nature of endometriosis.
Journal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders, 2017
Introduction This study aimed to identify different subgroups (clusters) of patients (n = 182) based on the previously defined variables “age” and “diagnostic delay” in order to identify varying needs of (socio-)medical care. Methods Five clusters were identified by two-step cluster analysis (SPSS 23.0). The mean values for parameters of quality of life, time course of disease progression and health service utilization were compared by chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis H test, and tested for correlations using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Results Clusters I and II patients recognized their endometriosis symptoms at a relatively late age. The results showed a short diagnostic delay and a low subjective disease burden, although cluster I was characterized by a high level of fatigue. Cluster III results indicated that a lack of social support and comparatively long diagnostic delay were major problems in this group. The women in cluster IV had the worst quality-of-life scores an...
Economic burden of endometriosis
Fertility and Sterility, 2006
Objective: To comprehensively review and evaluate the direct costs of endometriosis. Design and Setting: We systematically reviewed studies published since 1990, and conducted an analysis of publicly available national databases (Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project and National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey/National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey) in the United States. We assessed: [1] the overall economic impact of endometriosis; [2] the direct costs associated with specific treatments; and [3] the indirect costs of endometriosis associated with reduced work productivity. Results: Of 13 published studies meeting inclusion criteria, 11 (85%) addressed direct costs, a few studies addressed outpatient costs or indirect costs, and no study quantified the economic impact among adolescents. Direct endometriosis-related costs were considerable and appeared driven by hospitalizations. Our database analysis found: [1] as endometriosis-related hospital length of stay steadily declined from 1993 to 2002, per-patient cost increased 61%; [2] adolescents (aged 10 -17 years) had endometriosis-related hospitalizations;
Cureus
Endometriosis is a benign gynecological condition that elicits chronic pain in 2-10% of reproductive-age women in the United States and exists in approximately 50% of women with infertility. It creates complications such as hemorrhage and uterine rupture. Historically, the gynecologic symptoms of endometriosis have been associated with economic strain and inferior quality of life. It is suspected that endometriosis diagnosis and treatment are affected by health disparities throughout gynecological care. The goal of this review was to collate and report the current evidence on potential healthcare disparities related to endometriosis diagnosis, treatment, and care across race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. This scoping review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and searched the Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), Medline Ovid, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, and PsycInfo databases for relevant articles on the topic. Eligibility was established a priori to include articles written in English, published between 2015-2022, and reported on cohort, cross-sectional, or experimental studies conducted in the United States. Initially, 328 articles were found, and after screening and quality assessment, four articles were retained for the final review. Results indicated that White women had higher rates of minimally invasive procedures versus open abdominal surgeries than non-White women. White women also had fewer surgical complications compared to all other races and ethnicities. Black women had higher rates of perioperative complications, higher mortality, and spent more time in the perioperative stage than any other race or ethnicity. In the management of endometriosis, the limited research available showed that all non-White women encountered an increased risk of perioperative and postoperative complications compared to White women. More research is needed to explore diagnostic and treatment disparities beyond surgical management, socioeconomic barriers, and improved representation of racial and ethnic minority women.