Do traditional culture and identity promote the wellbeing of Indigenous Australians? Evidence from the 2008 NATSISS (original) (raw)
Related papers
Land, Spirit, Family: Exploring Determinants of Indigenous Wellbeing
2018
With current psychological research, and national and international agencies focused on improving the wellbeing of indigenous populations, so too has the need to identify and understand the interrelationships between social determinants of Indigenous health, culture and wellbeing. This essay aims to explore the current trends in positive psychology research methods, assessment instruments and theories, and compare and contrast these westernised constructs of wellbeing determinants to those of the indigenous cultures of Indigenous Australia, New Zealand Maori and Native Hawaiian societies.
Recent years have seen a burgeoning interest in developing indicator frameworks for 'Indigenous wellbeing'. Implicit in each of the frameworks are particular conceptions of what constitutes the 'good life' for Indigenous peoples and what 'Indigenous development' should entail. In developing these frameworks, then, certain judgements must be made about whether statistical equality should be prioritised as a 'development' goal. This issue has generated long standing debate and in this context must be broached anew. In this paper we briefly examine the growing interest in Indigenous wellbeing and outline three prominent indicator frameworks: the Productivity Commission's indicators for 'Overcoming Indigenous Disadvantage'; the 'capability indicators' developed by the Cape York Institute for Policy and Leadership; and the indicators of wellbeing developed by the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues. The first prioritises statistical equality between Indigenous and non Indigenous Australians; the second adds a concern with 'capabilities'; and the last emphasises the importance of distinct cultural preferences. We offer an assessment of these approaches, drawing in part on Amartya Sen's work. We argue that in seeking to improve the wellbeing of Indigenous Australians, policy makers should not only make their own normative assumptions clear, but also be aware of the implications of their decisions for constituents with different worldviews.
Australian journal of primary health, 2017
Indigenous people have long maintained that strong cultural identities are critical to health and wellbeing. The purpose of this systematic review is to examine whether interventions that entail strategies to enable expression of cultural identities for Australian Indigenous peoples are associated with measurable improvements in health and wellbeing. Peer-reviewed articles that reported quantitatively expressed health and wellbeing outcomes involving Indigenous Australian participants only were included. The cultural intervention component was defined and assessed by Indigenous researchers on the team. A narrative analysis was conducted. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42015027387). Thirteen articles describing eleven studies were identified, including one randomised control trial (RCT), one cluster RCT and two studies with non-randomised controls. Other studies reported on case series or cross-sectional studies. All except two studies described multiple intervention str...
Basic Human Need: a framework for dialogue on Indigenous social and emotional wellbeing.
This paper explores cross-cultural intervention based on empowerment and participation through dialogue. Dialogue is a process of joint reflection about the forces conditioning one’s situation that supports mobilisation for collective action. Sometimes considered to have been superceded by Amartya Sen’s capabilities approach, this paper argues that the concept of basic human need still has vigour as a framework for dialogue. To invigorate dialogue about basic human need, this paper surveys major works by authors from a range of disciplines, all of whom take a universalist rather than pluralist view of what it means to be fully human and have a good life. This background is used to arrive at a new synthesis of basic human need. This synthesis highlights the critical importance of control and local organisation for the social and emotional wellbeing of Indigenous Australians.
2019
Most current well-being measures ignore the contributions of natural systems in people’s well-being. Evaluating the role of natural resources in well-being is particularly important for many Indigenous and local communities to appropriately reflect their well-being and to inform future welfare policies. It is well acknowledged that Indigenous and peoples’ values and customs are well integrated with natural systems, and inclusion of these nature-related attributes into well-being measures is required to accurately measure Indigenous/local well-being. This study reviews the available well-being frameworks from global as well as from local—Australian perspectives; and proposes a holistic approach to assess the role of natural systems for human well-being using how Indigenous and local peoples’ social, economic and ecological values, and capabilities relate to natural systems, that can inform broader human well-being attributes. Both, Capability and the Millennium Assessment Approaches ...