The Controversial Association between “The Family Effect” and Corporate Performance: Analysis of Longitudinal Data (original) (raw)
Related papers
Family succession and firm performance: Evidence from Italian family firms
Journal of Corporate Finance, 2008
This article contributes to the growing empirical literature on family firms by studying the impact of the founder-chief executive officer (CEO) succession in a sample of Italian firms. We contrast firms that continue to be managed within the family by the heirs to the founders with firms in which the management is passed on to outsiders. Family successions, that is, successions by the founder's heirs, are further analyzed by assessing the impact of the sectoral intensity of competition on the post-succession performance. This analysis also addresses the endogeneity in the timing of the CEO succession by controlling for a pure mean-reversion effect in the firm's performance. We find that the maintenance of management within the family has a negative impact on the firm's performance, and this effect is largely borne by the good performers, especially in the more competitive sectors. These results indicate that there is no inherent superiority of the family-firm structure and emphasize the importance of conducting an analysis of governance in a variety of institutional settings.
FAMILY INVOLVEMENT IN MANAGEMENT AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM ITALY
2011
Using Total Factor Productivity (TFP) as a measure of corporate performance, this study compares the performance of owner management to that of firms run by professional managers over the period 2004-2006. We consider the influence of owner management for the sample as a whole and for subgroups of firms. The findings demonstrate that family run firms are less productive than
Firm performance and economic crisis: Family versus non-family businesses in Italy
African Journal of Business Management
This study investigates the performance of medium-sized family businesseshereafter MSFBsduring the economic recession by comparing family and non-family firms, and correlating the organisational performance to the family ownership and firms' solvency. An empirical research study was carried out on a sample of 128 Italian medium-sized businesseshereafter MSBs-(76 family and 52 non-family businesses). We used the AIDA-Bureau van Dijk database to collect data referring to three years 2007, 2009 and 2014, respectively corresponding to the pre-crisis phase-2007, the great recession-2009, and the post-crisis phase-2014. STATA software was used for analysing data and the analysis was organised into three steps. First, we collected the descriptive statistics. Then, we used a t-test to determine if businesses' performance and solvency significantly differ in family and nonfamily businesses subgroups. In the last step, we performed a regression analysis to examine the relationship between firms' profitability (dependent variable) and family ownership and solvency (independent variables). Contrary to previous research, we found that MSFBs performed worse at each stage of the crisis, especially during the harshest phase of the crisis. Results also show that family ownership negatively affected businesses' profitability. On the contrary, solvency positively affected firms' profitability at each stage of the crisis. Finally, we analysed and discussed a model case study, to better understand financial and economic dynamics of family firms during the analysed period. Although family firms' performance during the recession period has been widely studied, they generally referred to large companies. Analyses haven't considered MSBs, even if in recent years they have played an important role in several economic systems and show some distinctive features that can significantly differentiate them from large companies. The main contribution this study brings to the literature is investigating family business performance during a downturn, paying attention to MSBs.
Journal of Financial Management, Markets and Institutions
In the years following the economic and financial crisis, Italy, where most firms are family-owned, has seen the demise of more companies than any other country. To avoid a similar disaster in the future, it is important to understand which determinants influence firms’ survival. Stemming from financial and family business literature, this paper investigates the role of financial ratios and family corporate governance in predicting family firms’ survival probability. To obtain empirical evidence, it performs a mediating regression analysis using a sample of 273 Italian family firms. The main findings show that family ownership concentration and the presence of a family CEO increase firms’ survival probability, while a high number of family members involved in the firm and the co-presence of more generations hinder it.
Ownership and performance in the Italian stock exchange: the puzzle of family firms
ECONOMIA E POLITICA INDUSTRIALE, 2020
We present new evidence on the relationship between ownership, control and performance in family firms, by using a sample of Italian publicly listed companies from 2000 to 2017. We account for the potential self-selection bias of family firms with an endogenous treatment selection model. We do not find consistent evidence of a performance premium of Italian family firms or family CEOs as family firms achieve superior profitability, but lower market to book ratios. Interestingly, however, firm value is negatively impacted when the high controlling shares are disjointed from family ownership and when the family CEO is also Chair of the board. We also find that the equity stake is significantly lower when the CEO is a member of the controlling family, suggesting a trade-off between ownership and control within family firms.
INHERITED CONTROL AND FIRM PERFORMANCE IN ITALIAN SMEs by
2006
Despite the pervasive presence of family business worldwide, especially among small and medium sized companies, nearly all past studies on family founder succession have focused on large, public companies. We evaluate the issue of the inherited firm control on performance in an economic setting with a large presence of smalland medium-sized private firms run as family businesses. Our paper contributes to the existing literature in three ways. The first concerns the sample characteristics. By focusing on the transfer of business in private SMEs, our study helps to fill a gap in the existing literature that is largely concerned with public companies listed in official market. We set up a unique dataset by matching two different data sources: firstly, a cross-sectional survey dataset collected directly from more than 3,500 companies by means of a questionnaire and, secondly, a company account dataset drawn from Cerved. We merge survey data with balance sheet data in order to perform th...
The why and how of managerialization of family businesses: evidences from Italy
2015
This paper concerns how management processes adopted by family firms are influenced by family’s and organizational characteristics; more specifically we would like to contribute to the debate on the managerialization of family firms, by studying the determinants of the adoption of managerial systems. We consider managerialization of family business related to the diffusion of formal managerial mechanisms, both strategic planning and managerial control systems, and human resource management systems. We distinguish between determinants of managerialization related the family’s characteristics, such as involvement of family/non family managers, and organizational drivers. Differently from previous studies, we articulated family involvement in management, considering separately the involvement of family members in the top management team, in the techno-structure, and in the middle management. The research hypotheses have been tested on a sample of 99 family firms from the Novara provinc...
Family Firms and Performance Empirical Analysis from Spain
Corporate Ownership & Control, 2017
This paper provides empirical evidence on the impact of family-controlled firms on corporate performance, using financial information of 47590 family firms from 2010 to 2014. From the overall sample, approximately two-third of family firms have concentrated ownership, meanwhile, the remaining one-third have dispersed and unknown ownership. With respect to generation, 76% of the family firms were in the first generation, 21% for the second generation and approximately 3% for the third generation. The main findings are that ownership structure of family firms have a positive impact on their performance. Specifically, family firms with concentrated ownership outperformed family firms with dispersed ownership; however, family firms in the 1ª generation outperform family business in the 2ª and 3ª generation. Also, aggressive incentive policy negatively affects the performance of family business for the 1ª generation and has no impact on performance for 2ª and 3ª generational firms. Unlis...
2009
Research on the profitability of family firms is growing, but results are mixed, especially for small unlisted companies. We argue this is due to the co-presence of benefits and disadvantages of both family ownership (FO) and family involvement (FI). Thus, we build upon two complementary theoretical perspectives -the stewardship and the stagnation perspectives -to explore the presence of non-linear effects of these two variables on profitability. We run regression analyses on longitudinal data drawn from 294 small privately-held family firms in Italy. We measure FI by the involvement of the family in management, the involvement of the family in the board of directors and the number of generations involved. Our results grasp the complexity of the effects of FO and FI in small unquoted companies: we find an inverted U-shaped relationship between FO and ROA, a positive relationship between family involvement in management and ROE, and a negative relationship between the number of generations involved and ROE.