Familial thrombophilia and lifetime risk of venous thrombosis (original) (raw)
Related papers
TH Open, 2019
The clinical venous thromboembolism (VTE) pattern often shows wide heterogeneity within relatives of a VTE-affected family, although they carry the same thrombophilia defect. It is then mandatory to develop additional tools for assessing VTE risk in families with thrombophilia. This study aims to assess whether common environmental and genetic risk factors for VTE contribute to explain this heterogeneity. A total of 2,214 relatives from 651 families with known inherited thrombophilia were recruited at the referral center for thrombophilia in Marseilles, France, from 1986 to 2013. A thrombophilia screening was systematically performed in all included relatives. According to the severity of the thrombophilia defect, individuals were split into three groups: no familial defect, mild thrombophilia, and severe thrombophilia. In addition, common genetic factors (ABO blood group and 11 polymorphisms selected on the basis of their association with VTE in the general population) were genotyp...
Blood, 2009
Thrombophilia screening is controversial. In a retrospective family cohort, where probands had thrombosis and a thrombophilic defect, 2479 relatives were tested for thrombophilia. In antithrombin-, protein C-, and protein S-deficient relatives, annual incidences of venous thrombosis were 1.77% (95% CI, 1.14-2.60), 1.52% (95% CI, 1.06-2.11), and 1.90% (95% CI, 1.32-2.64), respectively, at a median age of 29 years and a positive family history of more than 20% symptomatic relatives. In relatives with factor V (FV) Leiden, prothrombin 20210G>A, or high FVIII levels, these were 0.49% (95% CI, 0.39-0.60), 0.34% (95% CI, 0.22-0.49), and 0.49% (95% CI, 0.41-0.51), respectively. High FIX, FXI, and TAFI, and hyperhomocysteinemia were not independent risk factors. Annual incidence of major bleeding in antithrombin-, protein C-, or protein S-deficient relatives on anticoagulants was 0.29% (95% CI, 0.03-1.04). Cumulative recurrence rates in relatives with antithrombin, protein C, or protein S deficiency were 19% at 2 years, 40% at 5 years, and 55% at 10 years. In relatives with FV Leiden, prothrombin 20210G>A, or high levels FVIII, these were 7%, 11%, and 25%, respectively. Considering its clinical implications, thrombophilia testing should address hereditary deficiencies of antithrombin, protein C, and protein S in patients with first venous thrombosis at young age and/or a strong family history of venous thrombosis. (Blood. 2009;113:5314-5322)
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2014
Background: Although predicting the risk of venous thrombosis (VT) in an individual from a family with inherited thrombophilia is of major importance, it is often not feasible. Objectives: To develop a simple risk assessment model that improves prediction of the risk of VT for individuals of families with inherited thrombophilia. Patients/methods: 1201 relatives from 430 families with inherited thrombophilia (deficiencies of antithrombin, protein C or protein S, and the factor V Leiden and F2 20210A mutations) were recruited at the referral center for thrombophilia in Marseilles, France, from 1986 to 2008. One hundred and twenty-two individuals had a personal history of VT. Sixteen preselected clinical and laboratory variables were used to derive the VT risk score. Results: The scores based on the 16 variables and on the five most strongly associated variables performed similarly (areas under receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.85 and 0.83, respectively). For the five-variable score, named the MARNI score, derived from family history score of VT, von Willebrand factor antigen levels, age, severity of thrombophilia, and FGG rs2066865, the risk of VT ranged from 0.2% for individuals with a score of 0 (n = 186) to > 70% for individuals with a score of ≥ 7 (n = 27). The model was validated with an internal bootstrap method. Conclusions: With the use of a simple scoring system, assessment of the risk of VT in subjects from families with inherited thrombophilia can be greatly improved. External validation is now needed to replicate these findings.
International Journal of Std & Aids, 2001
Background: Factor V Leiden is the most common genetic defect associated with venous thromboembolism. Its clinical expression is limited and shows a wide intra-and interfamilial variation, that might be explained by the influence of other genetic risk factors. Methods: We retrospectively studied 226 patients with factor V Leiden and documented venous thromboembolism (probands) and 400 first degree carrier relatives to assess the contribution of concomitant genetic risk factors to the occurrence of venous thromboembolism. Results: The prothrombin G20210A mutation was found in 8.3%, homozygosity of factor V Leiden in 7.2%, and inherited deficiencies of antithrombin, protein C or protein S in 4.7% of symptomatic carriers (probands and relatives), as compared with 6.0%, 3.4% and 0.9% of asymptomatic carriers, respectively. Annual incidences of venous thromboembolism in relatives with these concomitant defects were 0.57%, 1.41% and 4.76%, respectively, as compared with 0.39% in single heterozygous carriers of factor V Leiden.
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2005
To cite this article: Vossen CY, Conard J, Fontcuberta J, Makris M, van der Meer FJM, Pabinger I, Palareti G, Preston FE, Scharrer I, Souto JC, Svensson P, Walker ID, Rosendaal FR. Risk of a first venous thrombotic event in carriers of a familial thrombophilic defect. The European Prospective Cohort on Thrombophilia (EPCOT). J Thromb Haemost 2005; 3: 459-64. See also Spencer FA, Goldberg RJ. Asymptomatic thrombophilia-a family affair. This issue, pp 457-8.
Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2011
The utility of laboratory investigation of relatives of individuals with inherited thrombophilia is uncertain. To assess the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among the carriers, we investigated a family cohort of 1,720 relatives of probands with thrombophilia who were evaluated because of VTE (n=1,088), premature arterial thrombosis (n=113), obstetric complication (n=257), or universal screening before pregnancy or hormonal contraception or therapy (n=262); 968 relatives were carriers of thrombophilia. A first deep venous thrombosis (DVT) occurred in 44 carriers and 10 non-carriers during 37,688 and 29,548 observationyears from birth, respectively. The risk of DVT among the carriers compared with non-carriers was estimated as a hazard ratio (HR). If the proband had VTE and factor V Leiden (FVL) and/or prothrombin (PT)20210A, the HR for DVT was 2.77 (95%CI 1.21-4.82) in the carriers overall, and 5.54 (95%CI 3.20-187.00) in those homozygous or double heterozygous for FVL and PT20210A. If the proband had VTE and a deficiency of antithrombin (AT), protein C or S, the HR for DVT was 5.14 (95%CI 0.88-10.03) in the carriers overall, and 12.86 (95%CI 2.46-59.90) in those with AT deficiency. No increase in risk was found among the carriers who were relatives of the probands who were evaluated for reasons other than VTE. In conclusion, familial investigation for inherited thrombophilia seems justified for probands with previous VTE, but appears of doubtful utility for the relatives of probands without VTE. This should be taken with caution regarding families with deficiency of natural anticoagulants, given the low number of cases analysed.
Family history as a risk factor for venous thromboembolism
Thrombosis Research, 2008
Introduction: There are very few data assessing a family history of venous thromboembolism (VTE) as a risk factor for VTE. This question is nonetheless of interest as inherited risk factors are involved but at least partly unknown. Methods: The E.D.I.TH. study is a prospective hospital-based case-control study. The family history was assessed by using a standard questionnaire, considering the total number of the first-degree relatives and the number of these relatives who had suffered from VTE. We analysed 698 first VTE cases and their matched controls, 507 pairs without and 191 pairs with a major acquired risk factor (active malignancy, surgery or plaster cast in the past three months, pregnancy or delivery in the past three months). Results: A family history of VTE was associated with VTE occurrence, irrespective of carrying or not factor V Leiden mutation or G20210A prothrombin gene mutation and irrespective of the presence or absence of major acquired risk factors; adjusted conditional odds ratio: 2.7 (95%CI, 1.8-3.8). Conclusion: A family history might well be considered when estimating type and duration of prophylaxis for VTE specifically in patients with active cancer or who
Inherited thrombophilia due to factor V Leiden mutation*
Molecular Diagnosis, 1998
Inherited thrombophilia due to activated protein C resistance is now recognized as one of the major genetic risk factors in the development of venous thromboembolic disease. Activated protein C resistance is secondary to a point mutation in the factor V gene, factor V Leiden. The high prevalence of this mutation in the general population, mainly in Caucasians of European descent, is a major contributing factor to the high incidence of venous thromboembolic disease in the United States, affecting one in 1000 individuals annually. Heterozygosity and homozygosity for factor V Leiden increase the risk for thrombosis 5-to 10-fold and 50-to 100-fold, respectively, compared with genotypically normal individuals. Factor V Leiden is more common than all other known genetic risk factors for thrombosis, and its presence results in a compounded risk in patients with simultaneous inherited abnormalities such as protein C, protein S, antithrombin III deficiencies, hyperhomocysteinemia, and/or acquired risk factors. Therefore, detection of activated protein C resistance and genotyping for factor V Leiden are important for establishing risk for thrombosis and ultimately for patient management.
Factors that predict thrombosis in relatives of patients with venous thromboembolism
Blood, 2014
When counseling first-degree relatives of patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), it is important to know whether factors other than thrombophilia influence their risk for thrombosis. We assessed the risk for VTE in 915 first-degree relatives of patients with provoked VTE, compared this with the risk in 1752 first-degree relatives of patients with unprovoked VTE, and then combined data from the 2 groups of relatives to identify predictors of thrombosis. There had been 123 VTEs in 2617 first-degree relatives (0.12 per 100 person-years). The risk for VTE in first-degree relatives was higher if the index cases had an unprovoked compared with a provoked VTE (odds ratio [OR], 2.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.43-3.85), if the index case was younger (OR, 0.97 per year older; 95% CI, 0.96-0.99), and if an additional family member had VTE (OR, 2.71; 95% CI, 2.22-3.31). Among first-degree relatives of an index case with factor V Leiden or the prothrombin 20210A gene variant, the pres...