Including cognitive aspects in multiple criteria decision analysis (original) (raw)
Related papers
A Review of Selected Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Techniques and Applications
This paper presents a review of various multi-criteria decision analysis techniques. The focus of this research is to identify suitable techniques to be used to assign weights between different factors that influence user acceptance of software technology in the healthcare industry. Three widely known methodologies used for identifying, classifying and evaluating various alternatives are briefly described, namely the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Fuzzy Cognitive Maps and Fuzzy AHP, in order to identify the applicability and suitability of each in addressing our research problem.
An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods
Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods have evolved to accommodate various types of applications. Dozens of methods have been developed, with even small variations to existing methods causing the creation of new branches of research. This paper performs a literature review of common Multi-Criteria Decision Making methods, examines the advantages and disadvantages of the identified methods, and explains how their common applications relate to their relative strengths and weaknesses. The analysis of MCDM methods performed in this paper provides a clear guide for how MCDM methods should be used in particular situations.
American Journal of Operations Research, 2016
In Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, the well-known weighted sum method for aggregating normalised relative priorities ignores the unit of scale that may vary across the criteria and thus causes rank reversals. A new aggregation rule that explicitly includes the norms of priority vectors is derived and shown as a remedy for it. An algorithmic procedure is presented to demonstrate how it can as well be used in the Analytic Hierarchy Process when norms of priority vectors are not readily available. Also, recursion relations connecting two decision spaces with added or deleted alternatives give an opportunity to extend the idea of connectivity to a new concept of cognitive space. Expanded analytic modelling embracing multiple decision spaces or scenarios may assist in detecting deficiencies in analytic models and also grasping the big picture in decision making.
Cognitive Multiple Criteria Decision Making and the Legacy of the Analytic Hierarchy Process
Estudios de Economía Aplicada, 2019
Este trabajo recoge brevemente el concepto, la evolución histórica y las diferentes escuelas de una de las partes de la Investigación Operativa más fructífera y con mayor difusión de los últimos 45 años: la Decisión Multicriterio. Así mismo, analiza la evolución que el método científico ha seguido en este periodo de tiempo y cuáles son las nuevas orientaciones que presenta en el contexto de la Sociedad del Conocimiento. Finalmente, se incluyen una serie de ideas sobre cuáles pueden ser algunos de los retos futuros en el campo de la toma de decisiones multicriterio (TDMC), en particular en el contexto de una de las aproximaciones más populares: el Proceso Analítico Jerárquico (AHP). Tres problemas fundamentales, ya vislumbrados para esta escuela de pensamiento por su creador, necesitan ser abordados como futuros retos en el campo multicriterio. Este trabajo se ha dedicado a la memoria del profesor Thomas L. Saaty, el autor de AHP y uno de los matemáticos más brillantes e ingeniosos d...
A Novel Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Technique Considering Various Essential Characteristics
2021
This paper has proposed a novel Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) technique that considers relationships among the criteria, relationships among the alternatives, relationships among the criteria and the alternatives, the uncertainty or dilemma that the decision makers face in their decision making, the entropy among the criteria. The dilemma of the decision makers has been captured through the use of Hesitant Fuzzy Elements; the information content among the criteria has been captured by applying the concept of entropy through the application of a technique called IDOCRIW. A kind of sensitivity analysis has been performed to verify the effectiveness of the proposed technique. The proposed method has also been compared with four different types of already existing MCDA techniques, AHP, MAUT, MACBETH and MOORA. Both the sensitivity analysis and the comparison with other methods establish the effectiveness of the proposed technique.
Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Group Decision Processes
Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation, 2010
Important decisions are often taken by groups of decision makers who need to make choices among several alternatives, based on an appraisal of how the alternatives are likely to perform with regard to multiple objectives. Such decision processes can be supported by the methods of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) which help generate decision recommendations and offer process benefits in terms of enhanced decision quality, improved communication, and enhanced commitment to decision implementation. In this Chapter, we outline widely used MCDA methods and consider their uses in group decision making. We also review selected case studies and offer guidelines for the design of MCDA-assisted group decision processes. We conclude with thoughts on promising application domains and future research topics.
A Review of Mathematical Multi-Criteria Decision Models with A case study
IJRAR- International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, Vol.6, Special Issue, pp.111-124, 2019
Multi-Criteria Decision Making/Analysis (MCDM/MCDA) is a Core of Decision Theory, as an important field of Operational Research (OR) in Mathematics. Multi-Criteria Decision model is a technique that permits Decision Makers (DM) to make the best decision in the presence of multiple, potentially conflicting criteria. These MCDM methods have attracted much attention from Decision makers, academics, researchers and practitioners. Multi-Criteria Decision model is used to solve areas problems such as sciences, engineering, technology, economics, military strategies, business, supplier selection, Sports entity and many more. This MCDM is a Method of evaluating conflict real world situations, based on different quantitative, qualitative, criteria under risky, certain, uncertain environments. In this paper we have discussed the some well noted and discussed the results of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques with their classifications and characteristics. Moreover, we have compared few MCDM methods with a case study on IPL 2018. The main objective of this paper is multifold: First, to finds the applicability of MCDM methods in different situations by evaluating their relative strengths and weaknesses. Second, comparisons of MCDM methods using a case study. Our study concluded with an observation that the different Multi-Criteria Decision methods present different ranking for the same problem with same multiple attributes and same multiple alternatives although same decision maker. However, this paper does not claim that any method is better than other methods across all possible circumstances, but rather it emphasizes the importance of investigating different Multi-Criteria Decision-Making techniques to rank the decisions of each method and the importance of finding the most appropriate method for ranking the decisions in consideration of the decision-making conditions.
New Frontiers of Multiple Criteria Decision Making
Decision-making process involves a series of identifying the problems, constructing the preferences, evaluating the alternatives, and determining the best alternative Keendy and Raiffa, 1993;. Generally speaking, three kinds of formal analysis can be employed to perform the decision making problems :
Comparison among multi-criteria decision analysis techniques: a novel method
Progress in Artificial Intelligence, Volume 10(2), pp. 195-216, 2021
This paper proposes a novel method of comparison among the various multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) techniques. The motivation behind proposing novel method of comparison comes from the fact that in spite of the presence of significant number of MCDA techniques, decision makers face difficulty in selecting appropriate MCDA technique for a particular problem under study. The reason behind this is that the applications of different MCDA techniques may result in different sets of rankings for the same problem. Such dilemma makes it difficult for the decision makers to identify the most appropriate ranking and thus the most appropriate MCDA technique for their problem. In order to solve this problem, this paper proposes to emphasize on the performance of the obtained rankings so as to identify the most appropriate ranking. Thus, the proposed performance-based comparison method is based on the performance of the obtained rankings. A total of fourteen different MCDA techniques have been compared for the purpose. These methods have been applied to a case study so as to get the rankings of the alternatives. The proposed method is applied on these obtained rankings so as to identify the most effective ranking among them, for the problem at hand. The comparison with the help of the case study establishes the effectiveness of the proposed method of comparison among MCDA techniques. Keywords Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) techniques • Spearman rank correlation • Novel method of comparison • Performance-based comparison (PBC) • Ranking