From Letters to Loyalty: Aline la Despenser and the Meaning(s) of a Noblewoman’s Correspondence in Thirteenth-Century England (original) (raw)
Related papers
In August 1263, the king wrote to his escheators on both sides of the River Trent, informing them that John de Warenne, William de Valence and Hugh Bigod had all agreed to stand as sureties for Isabella de Forz, the widowed countess of Aumale. In return for the agreement to pay her relief, Henry III awarded Isabella seisin of the extensive estates in Yorkshire, Devon, Hampshire and the Isle of Wight that comprised her inheritance from her brother Baldwin de Revières, the former earl of Devon.
The Lisle Letters: Lady Honor Lisle’s Epistolary Influence
2014
This dissertation offers an original contribution to Tudor studies by examining The Lisle Letters as an illuminating example of how aristocratic Tudor women used the epistle to manipulate networks of obligation and gain socio-political influence. Women, such as Lady Honor Lisle, the primary subject of this study, fashioned letters to create and maintain communities of influence in order to assist their families, advance their social position, and bring various other projects to fruition. By using the lens of practice theory to examine the Lisle Letters, I will demonstrate that the relational aspects governing an individual's agency, in the light of ever-changing variables-friends, kinship groups, societal knowledge, socioeconomic status, and so on-are what allowed aristocratic women such as Lady Lisle to exercise influence, despite the fact they could not hold official positions of power, such as judge, magistrate, or Lord Privy Seal. I will argue that women's involvement in the socio-political world was a perpetual process of negotiation and adjustment within a web of imbricated relations, and that mastery of this diplomatic process could put considerable power in a woman's hands. The Lisle Letters highlight the importance of the epistle as a particularly important device of power accrual. The epistle, with its underpinning of obligation, its various styles, and its discursive conventions, allows us to consider how power was accessible outside of purely formal channels in a social (and political) context that attached great importance to written entreaties and the informal cultural rules surrounding them; it is because of such rules and conventions, that we discover, in the letter, a privileged tool for bridging the gap between formal and informal avenues of power. The Lisle Letters, for example, allow mistress and servant to traverse boundaries of gender and class by using the stylized rhetoric of patronage and the warm and more natural language of friendship. The various discursive styles allow for the boundaries between mistress and servant to be crossed by establishing intimate connections and trust-an area that has been little examined in epistolary scholarship. The letters further illustrate how the epistle could be used to create and maintain bonds across international borders-making connections and accruing influence to assist in a bid for upward mobility. The Lisle Letters also document Lady Lisle's negotiations with one of the key power figures of the Tudor era, Thomas Cromwell, in the male public arena of the court. The letters show us not simply v her personal strategies and tactics, but how she uses all of her resources, including the conventions of the epistle, to negotiate a better hand than the one she had been dealt. By examining the language of obligation and such rhetorical scripts as deference and assurance, we can see how women manipulated the epistle to create alliances and reinforce previous associations to bring their personal projects to fruition.
Renaissance Studies, 2009
Early modern letters have long been utilized for the light they shed on the religious consciences of women. In his seminal work, Patrick Collinson outlined the ‘confessional’ nature of women's correspondence with reformation preachers such as John Knox, Edward Dering, Thomas Cartwright and Thomas Wilcox. Traditional studies have approached letters as historical documents, reliable depositories of facts there to be picked clean by the assiduous scholar. Approached as ‘literary’ texts, however, reading letters from the perspectives of genre, rhetoric and epistolary conventions, erodes (but does not entirely erase) simple notions of individual subjectivity, and letters as ‘windows on men's souls’: religious self-representation instead appears as conscious, strategic, fluctuating and contested. Perhaps surprisingly given the religious turmoil of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, women's everyday correspondence, by its very nature pragmatic, registers little concerning religion. The epistolary representation of religious conscience it will, therefore, be argued in this essay most clearly emerges through situations of conflict or social negotiation. The essay will seek to explore the ways in which women constructed religious selves in correspondence by examining letters produced in a range of situations and performing a variety of functions. These include letters from women writing to extricate themselves or husbands and family from accusations of recusancy; letters of maternal rebuke chiding sons for lack of piety or irreligious behaviour; letters of religious nonconformists which were ‘scribally’ published or printed for posterity; and women's correspondence with male confessors.
2012
Conduct and courtesy literature have a long history, its vernacular tradition extending back to the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. We are familiar with modern versions of this literature: Ann Landers’ advice column, women’s magazines, and even modern books that tell us about etiquette. My dissertation examines English and French conduct literature of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries addressed to women. These texts build rhetorical authority in various ways. At one end of the spectrum of rhetorical authority there are texts that build credibility through charismatic and familial authority; on the other end there are those that build it through abstract means such as the use of allegory and visionary inspiration. I locate these different approaches in relationship to other medieval literary traditions such as the recording of visions, the generation of mental images as a means of mnemonic practice and meditation, the debate on women, and the use of exempla, a prominent rhet...
(Re)defining gender in Early Modern English drama, 2020
In this paper I shall explore the reasons that led Margaret Cavendish — a self-confident and determined noble woman— to use her emotions as strategies of power that shaped language in her plays, while experiencing totally contradictory emotions and describing herself as bashful and melancholic in her autobiographic work A True Relation of my Birth, Breeding, and Life. Four of her dramatic works are going to be the main corpus for this study because they offer the most revealing of her attitudes toward marriage and her desire for fame: But my approach to emotions will be more in line with Stephen Ahern’s aforementioned questions to account for affect, than with Wilcox’s perspective on emotions. To start with, the heroine of the tale of a marriage of near equals entitled Bell in Campo (1662) shows the necessary agency to rescue her husband at the head of an army of women, thus going beyond the limits of representation, removed from the conventions of affect expected from her role as a wife (Ahern 2019). Secondly, The Bridals (1662) satirizes marriage by offering two encountered reactions to the wedding night, two different affective investments on the part of the writer that would certainly provoke different reactions in readers. Finally, Loves Adventures (1662) introduces a woman who has to pass as a man in order to succeed in war and diplomacy, whereas The Convent of Pleasure (1668) suggests the possibility of having a separatist community of women and hints at lesbian sexuality — two plays that show different identities, affective assemblages (fake- queer — provoked by crossdressing— and lesbian) that take place in spaces such as a battlefield and a convent, both opened by heightened emotions.
Anales de la Universidad de Alicante. Historia Medieval, 2017
This article examines the reported speech of individuals who were accused of voicing criticism of the monarch or of royal government in fourteenthcentury England. These words were attributed to individuals outside of the social elite, who were then drawn into political discourses shaped by the ideologies and institutional structures of the state. This process might influence relations between neighbours and local communities, as well as between individuals and the officials who represented the Crown. When we think about how this affects our understanding of late medieval political culture, we need to think about the whole context of the accusation: the role of 'informers', witnesses and local juries. Political news sometimes emanated from royal office holders, messengers, clerks and sheriffs, allowing them to demonstrate just how well-connected they were with those in power. They could also manipulate the process to accuse opponents of spreading false tales and pursue local vendettas through the royal courts. All those who participated in the process had to interact with the language and procedures of royal government and they constructed their narratives carefully as part of the performance required by the various courts, councils and tribunals they came before. The written records, then, allow us to examine how the words of these individuals were rendered in textual form, and further, to think carefully about how they were represented as subjects of the Crown.