Randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol and intracervical prostaglandin E 2 gel for induction of labor at term (original) (raw)

A double-blind comparison of the safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 to induce labor

Irene Hoesli

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1997

View PDFchevron_right

A comparison of vaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 for induction of labour at term

Ambreen Malik

View PDFchevron_right

A randomised comparison of oral misoprostol and vaginal prostaglandin E2 tablets in labour induction at term

Peter Danielian

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2004

View PDFchevron_right

Efficacy of Misoprostol and Prostaglandin E2 Gel for Induction of Labor in Term Pregnancy

Samdana Wahab

Journal of Postgraduate Medical Institute, 2020

View PDFchevron_right

Labor induction with vaginal misoprostol and extra-amniotic prostaglandin F2α gel

Lennarth Nyström

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2002

View PDFchevron_right

Labor induction with vaginal misoprostol and extra-amniotic prostaglandin F2alpha gel

Lennarth Nyström

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

View PDFchevron_right

Oral administration of misoprostol for labor induction: A randomized controlled trial

Kelly Bennett

Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1997

View PDFchevron_right

Comparison of two dosing regimens of vaginal misoprostol for labour induction: a randomised controlled trial

Attibele Manjunath

Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

Labor induction post-term with 25 micrograms vs. 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol

Feza Burak

International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2003

View PDFchevron_right

Comparison of Two Dosage Regimens of Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labour at Term

Rubina Sohail

2016

View PDFchevron_right

Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel

Peter Danielian

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1999

View PDFchevron_right

A comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol tablets in induction of labour at term

Peter Danielian

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2001

View PDFchevron_right

Induction of labour at term: 25 mcg 2 hourly oral misoprostol or 6 hourly intracervical cerviprime, safety and efficacy

Dishant Sisodia

International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology

View PDFchevron_right

Comparative study of efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus oral misoprostol in induction of labour when used in equal doses

Swathi Bhat

International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2017

View PDFchevron_right

Comparison of titrated oral misoprostol solution versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour in term obstetric patients for obstetric and neonatal outcomes: a randomized controlled trial

Dr rajendra Shitole

International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2018

View PDFchevron_right

A comparative study of misoprostol oral versus vaginal route for induction of labour

Debasis Ray

International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology

View PDFchevron_right

A comparison of 100 µg oral misoprostol every 3 hours and 6 hours for labor induction: A randomized controlled trial

Saipin Pongsatha

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 2002

View PDFchevron_right

Intracervical misoprostol as an effective method of labor induction at term

T.-y. Chu

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1999

View PDFchevron_right

A masked randomized comparison of oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol for labor induction

Kelly Bennett

Obstetrics and gynecology, 1998

View PDFchevron_right

Comparison of efficacy of PGE2 gel, Oral misoprostol and combination of foleys bulb with Oral misoprostol in predicting the Outcome of induction of labour: A randomized controlled trial

IP Innovative Publication Pvt. Ltd.

IP innovative publication pvt. ltd, 2019

View PDFchevron_right

A comparative study of vaginal misoprostol versus oral misoprostol for induction of labour

SHASHWAT JANI

International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology

View PDFchevron_right

A comparative study to evaluate the effect of misoprostol for induction of labour at term by intravaginal versus sublingual route

Dr. Rajkishori Dandotiya

Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research, 2018

View PDFchevron_right

Randomized controlled trial between sublingual and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour at term

Alaa El-Feky

Evidence Based Women's Health Journal

View PDFchevron_right

Oral: Vaginal Misoprostol: Which route for induction of term labor?

Dr.Archana Amatya

Nepal Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

Comparative Study of Efficacy and Safety of Oral Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction or Labour

Varsha Deshmukh

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2013

View PDFchevron_right

A comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor

RIZA MADAZLI

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2005

View PDFchevron_right

EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF VAGINAL MISOPROSTOL FOR INDUCTION OF LABOUR IN UNFAVOURABLE CERVIX

Syed Danish

View PDFchevron_right

Misoprostol dose selection in a controlled-release vaginal insert for induction of labor in nulliparous women

Carlos Castañeda

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2005

View PDFchevron_right

Oral or vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor

Hazem El-Refaey

International Journal of …, 1997

View PDFchevron_right

Titrated oral misoprostol solution versus vaginal misoprostol for labor induction

Aurélio Costa

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2013

View PDFchevron_right

Efficacy of 25 mcg sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor

Noor Sabzposh

International journal of reproduction, contraception, obstetrics and gynecology, 2017

View PDFchevron_right