LexAtlas C19 - Brazil - The Timeline of the Federal Government's Strategy to spread Covid-19 (original) (raw)
Related papers
THE CHALLENGES OF BRAZILIAN FEDERALISM AND THE DEFENCE OF FREEDOMS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
Freedom v. Risk. Social Control and the Idea of Law in the Covid-19 Emergency, 2023
The federalist ideology had a great impact on the world, mainly in Latin American countries, during the 19th Century due to the influence of the United States of America. Despite the decrease in the number of federations during the 20th Century, its importance can be observed by the fact that about 40% of the world population is governed by some form of Federalism. Countries adopting the federalist structure generally have large territories or a population composed of several ethnic and idiomatic groups, allowing the national government to adapt to the specific demands of each population. In this sense, it is observed that there is no single model of federation, and each State builds its own federative system. The liberal spirit that permeates the historical dynamics of the federalist ideology aims to avoid a concentration of powers, proposing a decentralised organisation and favouring democracy. The challenges that democracies and federations face, due to the political, economic and social transformations that have generated the worldwide wave of “autocratisation”, have been amplified by the health emergency situation, caused by the novel coronavirus pandemic. In Brazil, the government’s work to contain the outbreak of Covid-19 has put individual liberties, social rights and the structure of federalism back to the test. Facing the health emergency in Brazil and in other countries around the world, as evidenced in the webinar «Freedom v. Risk: social control and the idea of law in the Covid-19 emergency», organised by the Dipartimento di Scienze giuridiche della Università degli Studi di Firenze, has encouraged the rethinking of some debates, from a pandemic perspective, such as the restriction of fundamental rights, the resurgence of executive power, the possibility of introducing modalities of the State of Exception, and a new Constituent Assembly.
Covid-19 Through Brazilian Courts: The Deserving and the Undeserving Vulnerable
German Law Journal
Looking into these times of neoconservatism in Brazil, marked by a far-right agenda and populism, this Article explores the role of vulnerability (as a legal theory, a legal principle or factual consideration) in the litigation prompted by the pandemic in Brazil. The usages of vulnerability as a form of resistance to the denial of their identity and vulnerable condition show that vulnerability can take different forms through litigants and may have an independent meaning to what is defined in legal theory or law. This is most evident by the fact that litigants dispute government policies based on ideologies that contest their identities (and not merely their vulnerability). Four case studies substantiate this Article with lawsuits brought to higher courts by judicially active groups: prisoners, indigenous people, Afro-Brazilian ethnic communities and gig economy drivers. They are what I call “undeserving vulnerables”, groups discriminated from a legally recognized vulnerable group t...
IMPACTS OF COVID-19 ON HUMAN RIGHTS: PERCEPTIONS OF RESIDENTS OF THE CITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito (REED), 2022
The concept of human rights is not consensual, however, it persists in the moral, political and legal culture of the modern world. The State has always occupied an ambiguous and dialectical place, sometimes being directly or indirectly responsible for the offense, sometimes responsible for the protection of rights. In addition to the aspect of legitimacy, the Covid-19 pandemic led to a much more serious problem related to the policy adopted by the Brazilian Government and its effects. In order to know the perception of residents of the city of Rio de Janeiro on aspects related to the impacts of Covid-19 on 5 basic rights: health, education, freedom to come and go, work and income, and voting, a survey of the type web survey. To reach the respondents, the snowball method was used, having as a starting point the contact list of the study authors. As a result, most respondents identified the five rights mentioned as Human Rights and revealed that they believe that: 1) public authorities are responsible for limiting rights; 2) the restriction of any of the aforementioned rights is justifiable during the pandemic; 3) the impact of limitations on rights on lower socioeconomic classes was greater; 4) are dissatisfied with the performance of the Federal Government regarding the measures adopted; and, finally, 5) who are complying with the rules of social isolation at the same time that other residents of the city of Rio de Janeiro are not.
Brazil and the Fight Against Covid-19
Comparative Federalism and Covid-19, 2021
From the outset of the Covid-19 pandemic, a central feature of federalism in Brazil was the strong role played by state governors and the fact that this stood in contrast to the denialism of the President Jair Bolsonaro, who neglected his federal responsibilities. Whereas the President refused to support isolation measures and import medicines and supplies for curbing the pandemic, governors quickly performed these tasks. Subnational responsibility was confirmed by the Supreme Court, giving governors and mayors important political visibility and shaking up the entrenched structures of Brazil's centralised federalism. This chapter discusses the dual nature of Brazilian federalism, as evidenced by the Covid-19 pandemic. On the one hand, the crisis highlighted the importance of the federal government in the institutional arrangement of Brazilian federalism, which is highly centralised; on the other hand, it has provided greater scope for action by state governments, whose political power has gradually diminished over the 30 years since the 1988 Constitution came into being. The Federative Republic of Brazil is the largest country in South America and the fifth largest in the world. Its Constitution of 1988 makes it a significantly decentralised federation in terms of the distribution of political power and fiscal resources between the three levels of government-federal, state, and municipal-each of which consists of 'federative entities' (Souza 1997). Brazil is also highly socioeconomically heterogeneous, a fact that presented considerable challenges in its efforts to confront the Covid-19 pandemic. Politically, too, the country is fragmented, with 24 political parties represented in Congress, the federal parliament. The 10 with the largest congressional representation are the Brazilian Democratic Movement (MDB), Workers'
3. The repercussions of dismantling Brazil's social protection system in the fight against Covid-19
Decent Work or Decent Income, 2021
This chapter is organized into six sections. The first one refers to this brief introduction. The second section presents a short panorama of the institutional innovations prompted by the 1988 Constitution, which has anchored the Social Security model in Brazil, and the tensioning for its realization. The third presents the Constitutional Amendment 95/2016 (EC 95/2016), its mechanisms, and consequences in confronting Covid-19. The fourth section describes the 2017 labour reform, its effects, and discusses how the flexibilisation of rights has impacted the worsening of social inequalities and the protection of workers. The fifth one briefly debates the stance adopted by Bolsonaro's government in the face of the Covid-19 pandemic, as a form of contextualisation of Brazil's current scenario. Lastly, in the conclusion, we present a summary of the discussion.
Judicialization of administrative measures to tackle the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil
2020
This article studied the judicialization processes related to the pandemic of the new coronavirus, within the scope of Administrative Law. The cases that reached the Supreme Federal Court (STF), available at the COVID-19 Action Panel, were analyzed, as well as a sample of the cases that reached the state courts, obtained through journalistic reports, consolidated at the Portal Consultor Juridico. Descriptive and content analysis techniques were used, in the thematic mode, for both sources of information. The following variables were analyzed: group of procedural classes, procedural classes, main subject, date of assessment, time until the first decision, decisions, group of decisions and total of processes downloaded by remote means. Approximately 34% of the actions referred to the easing or tightening of restrictive measures for the circulation of the population and the opening of trade and services, and another 34% to budgetary issues, mainly dealing with the suspension of state d...
Border Regimes and Pandemic Law in Time of COVID-19: A View from Brazil
AJIL unbound, 2020
COVID-19 has had a profound impact on migrants and refugees the world over. Their pre-existing vulnerabilities were immediately exacerbated as national health systems were often overwhelmed and many disease control measures were either inaccessible to them or had disproportionate socioeconomic effects. But migrants and refugees have also been framed as prima facie causes for the transboundary spread of the virus, and public health exception and derogation clauses in both national and international refugee and human rights instruments have been used to block their entry, suspend asylum processing, or trigger deportations. Taking the example of Brazil as a point of departure, the present contribution argues that (for at least some states) the appearance of the virus seems to have served as a legal carte blanche for fundamentally reconfiguring or closing down border regimes. More specifically, we argue that the strategic mainstreaming of global health regulations into border regimes points to the emergence of a "pandemic law" that encroaches upon already fragile transnational legal regime complexes, with the potential to upend or hollow out existing frameworks for migrant and refugee protection. Legal Long Games and International Regime Complexity COVID-19 has hit Brazil hard, both in terms of infection and mortality rates and in relation to the immediate and foreseeable mid-and longer-term economic consequences. 1 In the context of migrants and refugees, however, the government appears to have embraced the pandemic as offering a new legal passageway enabling the circumvention of both international law and domestic obligations relating to refugees and migrant populations. Once the pandemic emerged, Brazil's federal government quickly identified internationally sanctioned public health exceptions-both in the national Migration Law and in Article 33.2 of the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees-as presumptive grounds for not just border closures but also summary deportations of migrants and refugees without regard for the non-refoulement principle. For a government otherwise at the forefront of COVID-negationism, World Health Organization (WHO)-mandated disease control measures seemed to offer themselves as a powerful tool to undermine international human rights and refugee law.
COVID-19 magnifies the vulnerabilities: The Brazilian case
International Journal of Discrimination and the Law, 2021
This paper discusses inequalities of the health system in Brazil and advocates that now, more than ever in light of the Covid-19 pandemic, the world needs to put in place a more collaborative and egalitarian way of financing health research and investments in public health systems. The role of the state and institutions in the design of public policies for the realization of social rights is debated in the face of the economic and political crisis. Here we draw upon Martha Fineman's vulnerability theory and Thomas Pogge's view on justice with regard to health.
philosophy international journal, 2022
Brazil was one of the countries that was most impacted by the pandemic, both in the epidemiological aspect and in the economic causes. The federal government's lack of social responsibility in dealing responsibly and seriously with the effects of COVID-19 has thrown Brazil, one of the largest economies in the world, down a slippery slope. Our work makes a bibliographical review in the light of numbers and economic data from the beginning of the pandemic that portray how a country marked by a large gap of social inequality, the irresponsibility of the federal government only increased the gap between social classes, that is, excluded even more millions of people from the market of goods and services. Bioethics allied with economic thought showed itself to be a great intellectual tool, in order to show perspectives so that Brazil can overcome this unfair reality aggravated by the pandemic.