Toward a Theory of Complex and Cognitive Systems (original) (raw)

Abstract

sparkles

AI

The paper proposes a series of principles aimed at enhancing human-centered computational systems, emphasizing the interplay between human cognition and technology. Key principles such as the Aretha Franklin Principle and the Fort Knox Principle advocate for the integration of human and machine capabilities while preserving and utilizing expert knowledge. The discussion highlights the importance of contextual adaptability in design and the inherent challenges presented by dynamic sociotechnical environments, thereby supporting a theoretical foundation for complex cognitive systems.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (22)

  1. R.R. Hoffman et al., "The Triples Rule," IEEE Intelligent Systems, May/June 2002, pp. 62-65.
  2. M. Endsley and R.R. Hoffman, "The Saca- gawea Principle," IEEE Intelligent Systems, Nov./Dec. 2002, pp. 80-85.
  3. S.W.A. Dekker, J.M. Nyce, and R.R. Hoff- man, "From Contextual Inquiry to Designable Futures: What Do We Need to Get There?" IEEE Intelligent Systems, Mar./Apr. 2003, pp. 74-77.
  4. R.R. Hoffman and L.F. Hanes, "The Boiled Frog Problem," IEEE Intelligent Systems, July/Aug. 2003, pp. 68-71.
  5. R.R. Hoffman and P.J. Hayes, "The Pleasure Principle," IEEE Intelligent Systems, Jan./Feb. 2004, pp. 86-89.
  6. R.R. Hoffman, G. Lintern, and S. Eitelman, "The Janus Principle," IEEE Intelligent Sys- tems, Mar./Apr. 2004, pp. 78-80.
  7. G. Klein et al., "Ten Challenges for Making Automation a 'Team Player' in Joint Human- Agent Activity," IEEE Intelligent Systems, Nov./Dec. 2004, pp. 91-95.
  8. P.J. Feltovich, R.R. Hoffman, and D. Woods, "Keeping It Too Simple: How the Reductive Tendency Affects Cognitive Engineering," IEEE Intelligent Systems, May/June 2004, pp. 90-95.
  9. R.R. Hoffman, A. Roesler, and B.M. Moon, "What Is Design in the Context of Human- Centered Computing?" IEEE Intelligent Sys- tems, July/Aug. 2004, pp. 89-95.
  10. D.D. Woods and R.I. Cook, "Nine Steps to Move Forward from Error," Cognition, Tech- nology, and Work, vol. 4, 2002, pp. 137-144.
  11. A. Kaplan, The Conduct of Inquiry, Chandler, 1964.
  12. W. Weimer, Notes on Methodology of Scien- tific Research, Lawrence Erlbaum, 1979.
  13. K.J.W. Craik, "Theory of the Operator in Control Systems: I. The Operator as an Engi- neering System," British J. Psychology, vol. 38, 1947, pp. 56-61.
  14. K.J. Vicente, "Crazy Clocks: Counterintuitive Consequences of 'Intelligent' Automation," IEEE Intelligent Systems, Nov./Dec. 2001, pp. 74-76.
  15. E. Hutchins, Cognition in the Wild, MIT Press, 1995.
  16. G. Coulouris, J. Dollimore, and T. Kindberg, Distributed Systems: Concepts and Design, 3rd ed., Addison-Wesley, 2001.
  17. P. Koopman and R.R. Hoffman, "Work- Arounds, Make-Work, and Kludges," IEEE Intelligent Systems, Nov./Dec. 2003, pp. 70-75.
  18. R.R. Hoffman, G. Klein, and K.R. Laughery, "The State of Cognitive Systems Engineer- ing," IEEE Intelligent Systems, Jan./Feb. 2002, pp. 73-75.
  19. G. Klein et al., "Macrocognition," IEEE Intel- ligent Systems, May/June 2003, pp. 81-85.
  20. D.D. Woods and R. Hoffman, A Theory of Complex Cognitive Systems, tech. report, Inst. Human and Machine Cognition, 2005.
  21. JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2005 www.computer.org/intelligent
  22. Robert R. Hoffman is a senior research scientist at the Institute for Human and Machine Cognition. Contact him at IHMC, 40 So. Alcaniz St., Pensacola, FL 32502- 6008; rhoffman@ihmc.us. David D. Woods is a professor of industrial and sys- tems engineering and the coordinator of the Cognitive Systems Engineer- ing Laboratory at Ohio State Univer- sity. Contact him at the Cognitive Systems Eng. Lab, 210 Baker Systems, Ohio State Univ., 1971 Neil Ave., Columbus, OH 43210; woods@csel.eng.ohio-state.edu.