Faculty Perceptions of Teaching in Undergraduate Computer Science Education (original) (raw)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the attitudes of computer science faculty members towards undergraduate teaching. The questions addressed in this study are: (1) How important is effective teaching to computer science faculty members at the undergraduate level and how important do they perceive effective teaching to be to their institution? 2) How much teacher training have computer science faculty members received? 3) What do computer science faculty members believe about teaching? 4) What are the current teaching practices of computer science faculty members and what influences those practices? 5) What incentives or rewards are offered to faculty members who try innovative teaching methods or receive additional training? The motivation for investigating these questions is a general dissatisfaction among students with teaching quality and a desire of faculty members to improve the efficacy of recruitment and retention of students in computer science programs. Over three hundred faculty members participated in an online survey in the Fall of 2008 that addressed the questions stated above. The results of this study helped the author develop and make recommendations to help computer science departments understand faculty attitudes towards teaching and influence their choices of teaching methods.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (24)

  1. Abdelzaher, A. (2008). Faculty Perceptions of Teaching in Undergraduate Computer Science Education, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Virginia.
  2. Barker, L. J., Gavin-Doxas, K., & Roberts, E. (2005). What Can Computer Science Learn from a Fine Arts Approach to Teaching? ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 37(1), 421-425.
  3. Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1992). Knowing and Reasoning in College: Gender-Related Patterns in Students' Intellectual Development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  4. Booth, S. (2001). Learning Computer Science and Engineering in Context. Computer Science Education, 11(3), 169-188.
  5. Brawner, C. E., Felder, R. M., Allen, R. H., & Brent, R. (2002, June). How important is Effective Teaching to Engineering Faculty and Administrators? Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada.
  6. Chase, J. D., & Okie, E. G. (2000, March). Combining Cooperative Learning and Peer Instruction in Introductory Computer Science. Paper presented at the SIGCSE Conference, Austin, Texas.
  7. Coomes, M. D., & DeBard, R. (Eds.). (2004). Serving the Millennial Generation: New Directions for Student Services (106th ed.). San Francisco: Wiley Subscription Services.
  8. DeBard, R. (2004). Millenials Coming to College. In M. D. Coomes & R. DeBard (Eds.), New Directions for Student Services: Serving the Millennial Generation (pp. 33-45). San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
  9. Evans, N. J., Forney, D. S., & Guido-DiBrito, F. (1998). Student Development in College: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  10. Felder, R. M. (1993). Teaching Teachers to Teach: The Case for Mentoring. Chemical Engineering Education, 23(3), 174-193.
  11. Grasha, A. F. (2002). Teaching With Style: A practical guide to enhancing learning by understanding teaching & learning styles. Pittsburgh, PA: Alliance Publishers.
  12. Havita, N. (2000). Becoming a better teacher: a case of changing the pedagogical knowledge and beliefs of law professors. Instructional Science, 28, 491-523.
  13. Huang, Y., Yelin, J. M. H., & Turn, J. (2005, October). Future engineering faculty: How do they think about teaching? Paper presented at the ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Indianapolis, IN.
  14. Knight, J., Prey, J., & Wulf, W. (1995). Undergraduate computer science education: a new curriculum philosophy & overview. In R. Beck & D. Goelman (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-fifth SIGCSE symposium on Computer science education (pp. 155-159). Phoenix, AZ: ACM.
  15. Lee, J. A. N. (2001). Teaching and Learning in the 21st Century: The development of "future CS faculty". SIGCSE Bulletin, 33(2), 25-30.
  16. McConnell, J. J. (1996, June). Active learning and its use in Computer Science. Paper presented at the Integrating Technology into C.S.E, Barcelona, Spain.
  17. Pollard, S., & Duvall, R. C. (2006, March). Everything I Needed to Know About Teaching I Learned in Kindergarten: Bringing Elementary Education Techniques to Undergraduate Computer Science Classes. Paper presented at the SIGCSE, Houston, TX.
  18. Prey, J. C. (1995, November). Cooperative Learning in an Undergraduate Computer Science Curriculum. Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education Conference, Atlanta, GA.
  19. Stamm, S. (2004). Mixed Nuts: Atypical Classroom Techniques for Computer Science Courses (10-4th
  20. Ed.). Retrieved February 3, 2007, from Association of Computing Machinery Web site: http:// www.acm.org/crossroads/xrds10-4/mixednuts.html
  21. Tucker, A. (1996). Strategic directions in computer science education. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 28(4), 836-845.
  22. Vegso, J. (2008). Enrollments and Degree Production at US CS Departments Drop Further in 2006-07. Computing Research News, 2(20), 4.
  23. Wilkens, L., Ramamurthy, B., Olan, M., Kumar, A., Harmeyer, K., & D'Antonio, L. (2004). Emerging areas in undergraduate computer science education: panel discussion. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 20, 134-138.
  24. Wilson, M. (2004). Teaching, Learning, and Millennial Students. In M. D. Coomes & R. DeBard (Eds.), Serving the Millennial Generation (pp. 59-72). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.