Keeping Legislators Informed: The University of Manitoba Study (original) (raw)
Related papers
This publication is part of a series that reprints articles on a range of thematic issues published in the "Canadian Journal of Higher Education." This collection focuses on the relationship between the Canadian university and the state. After a preface and an introduction, an introductory monograph, "University-Government Relations in Canada: A Brief Review of the 'Traditional Literature'" (Glen A. Jones), summarizes some of the issues.
Tertiary Education and Management, 2002
The objective of this paper is to identify current policy pressures in Canadian higher education and explore their implications for academic decision-making bodies based on data we obtained in our national study on university senates. We describe two inter-related sets of public policy pressures that have emerged in recent years in Canada including on-going financial restraint and a renewed interest in university research. We conclude by reviewing a number of important implications for Canadian university governance in the context of contemporary policy pressures.
University governance has become an important international issue in higher education. This paper reports on the findings of a new study of university senates (academic councils) in Canadian universities in order to analyze changes in structure and in senate members' perceptions of the structure and role of senates over the last decade. There have been changes to the structure and organizational arrangements of many Canadian university senates over the last ten years; the emergence of "new" universities has led to the creation of academic decision making bodies that have tended to be smaller than their more traditional peers, and many universities have rationalized and reformed their committee structures. Compared with results from a similar study conducted in 2000, in which many of the challenges to university governance were perceived as external (notably related to economic factors), respondents cited a growing number of "internal" pressures, including tensions between the role of academic senates in overseeing the academic mission of the University and the work of labour unions representing faculty members' employment interests, the importance of senate orientation programming, the need for better oversight and assessment of academic quality, the relative roles of board, senate and the administration, and continuing concerns about the limited role of the senate in strategic planning, financial, research and fund-raising issues and activities..
Organizational capacity and political activities of Canadian university faculty associations
Interchange, 1998
In this study we examine the organizational capacity and political activities of Canadian university faculty associations in the development of higher education policy. We attempt to describe, from the perspective of the faculty associations, their political role both internal and external to the university and the extent to which faculty associations perceive themselves as being able to influence issues of policy. We report the findings of a national survey of university faculty associations including data on organizational structure, finance, perceived influence on institutional and provincial government, policy, services and programs, and other factors related to their role as political pressure groups.
College and University Planning for State Legislative Relations: Lessons from a Case Study
1989
Authorities responsible for promoting the cause of public higher education in state legislatures lack appropriate planning guidelines for state legislative relations. A state legislative plan was developed and initiated by a land-grant university with the aim of improving the commitment of state resources to the institution. Appropriations requested and realized were considered the primary measure of plan efficacy. Actual implementation of the planning process has suggested that effective and efficient planning for state legislative relations s)uld include: (11 the incorporation of a.continuous environmehtal scanning process to Aetermine changes in issues, participants and attitudes, both external and internal to the institution; (2) assessment: evaluation and feedback components to assure inztitutional goal attainment; and (3) development of a continuous year-round process to assure the political viability of institutional decision-making. Charts showing the institutional plan and the planning model for state legislative relations are appended. Includes nine references.
Canadian Journal of Higher Education
Following the design of a similar study in 2000, the authors conducted a study of university senates (academic councils) to assess the current state of academic governance in Canada’s universities. An earlier paper presented and analyzed the data that were gathered about senate size, composition, structure, legislative authority and work, and about structural and governance changes to senates in the intervening decade. The current paper focuses on themes arising from responses to the open-ended questions, highlighting key findings. Significant findings relate to a sizeable discrepancy between senate members’ perceptions of the importance of effective academic oversight, and their success at achieving this. Suggested reforms include reviewing and improving senate performance; fostering a culture of trust and respect among and within governing bodies; clarifying spheres of authority and accountability; and promoting the importance of collegial governance and oversight within the ins...
Canadian Journal of Higher Education
In order to fulfill their missions, research universities must maintain conditions and capacity for knowledge production and dissemination, while responding to the expectations of governments, other stakeholders, and/or markets. That universities succeed in this quest is vital, not only for their own future as organizations but also for the benefit of current and future generations of students, stakeholders, and society at large. We sought to contribute to the understanding of how higher education institutions and systems rise to the challenge of achieving and sustaining relative institutional autonomy by conducting a comparative case study of the governance of six major universities in five provinces in Canada. This article presents our findings with respect to provincial oversight of the case universities. We found that the case universities appeared to be coming from and to remain at different points on a state supervision/autonomy continuum, but all appeared to be experiencing g...
Universities as Political Institutions
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 2015
This paper explores universities as political institutions in the first place. Some principles related to interest groups, power, competition for scarce resources and negotiation in search of compromise are found to be common to businesses and the academic environment as well. We then reviewed the main characteristics of political systems which we also found to be present in universities. We argue that politics in universities is not necessarily a bad thing since using it in an appropriate, rational way is proven to have more advantages than disadvantages. Next, we analyzed universities as coalitions, looked into their sources of power and decision making processes and discussed the relationship between authorities and partisans. Finally, we discussed some leadership issues in political systems using examples from our own experience as employees in different Romanian universities*. Our concluding remarks support the idea that political action in universities may be used as an instrument for reaching goals if it is backed by leadership skills as drivers for promoting collaborative and interdependent relationships between internal and external audiences.