How Political Parties Respond to Pariah Street Protest: The Case of Anti-Corona Mobilisation in Germany (original) (raw)
Related papers
Mainstreaming the Radical Right? The ambiguous populism of the Covid-19 Street Protest in Germany
2022
In Germany, tens of thousands of people have taken to the streets to demonstrate against the government's actions on Covid-19 since the spring of 2020. What makes these protests puzzling is their unusual heterogeneous political composition and ambiguous symbolism. This paper argues that protesters used the pandemic (and calls for “freedom” from restrictions) to bridge left- and right-wing movement frames. Importantly, though, the amplification of radical right strands of populist discourse played a central role in this frame bridging. These arguments are supported by a visual discourse analysis using photographs of demonstrators and protest materials (N=212) taken at the Berlin Querdenken demonstration on September 29, 2020. The implications of these findings for the mainstreaming of right-wing politics are discussed.
Mainstreaming the radical right? The ambiguous populism of the Corona Street Protest in
OSF Preprint, 2022
In Germany, thousands of people have taken to the streets against the government's actions on Covid-19 since spring 2020. The protests are startling because of their heterogeneity and the ambiguity of their symbolism. This paper argues that the pandemic created a shared horizon that allowed pre-existing populist discourses to coalesce and thereby bridge pre-pandemic group boundaries. Further, populism gains its mobilizing power from a pronounced political cynicism that facilitates the discursive embedding of right-wing ideologies. The co-presence of extreme and more established positions can contribute to the diffusion of the former among the political middle of society (mainstreaming). These arguments are supported by a visual discourse analysis using photographs of demonstrators and protest materials (N=216) taken at the Berlin »Hygiene« demonstration on September 29, 2020.
Corona protests in Germany: insights into a new movement
Diálogos Institucionais e Políticas de Enfrentamento da Crise, 2021
In August 2020, the German capital of Berlin became the stage for political manifestations organized by regional and relatively unknown groups of individuals with diverse political agendas. The German government and the public observed smaller and bigger agglomerations of up to 40.000 citizens of different backgrounds articulating themselves critically towards the political and legal measures taken by the government to address the crisis caused by COVID-19. The public perception of these newly identified networks and organizations and their diverging political agendas posed questions to traditional understandings of political mobilization. While policy makers, researchers, the media and the general public are often categorizing political groups or movements into specific sections including left, right, center and others, the newly growing so called “anti-corona” or “corona-sceptical” movement in Germany did not allow an easy categorization at first sight. This chapter will give an overview and a first insight into this newly evolving movement, its political agenda and into its mechanisms of political mobilization. It will be shown, how a heterogeneous mixture of middle class citizens, peace movement activists, right wing extremists, antisemitic conspiracy theorists and others joined a common platform strengthened by social media activism and so called alternative media channels.
Protest and Electoral Breakthrough: Challenger Party-Movement Interactions in Germany
German Politics, 2022
This paper studies party-movement interactions in Germany, focusing on Die Linke and the AfD, the two most recent additions to Germany’s multi-party system. The electoral rise of both challenger parties went along with mass protests, opposition to Hartz IV in the mid-2000s and anti-Islamic PEGIDA mobilisation in the mid-2010s. We shift the emphasis from how social movements turn into political parties, including significant organisational and personal overlap, to more indirect ways of how protest and electoral politics interact. Specifically, we identify a process composed of two interrelated mechanisms: an external politicisation spiral and an intra-party innovation spiral. We show how mass protest triggers both discursive shifts in the public sphere and internal strategic realignment, providing an opportunity for parties to ride the wave, secure their competitive advantages, and mobilise on the protestors’ grievances in the electoral arena. In such a way, challenger parties can take advantage of street protests even when they do not directly emerge from a movement. Methodologically, the article is based on a paired comparison, relying on survey data and an original protest event analysis that provides novel data on anti-Hartz IV and PEGIDA protest mobilisation in Germany.
The mobilisation potential of anti-containment protests in Germany
West European Politics, 2023
The Covid-19 pandemic triggered polarisation across Europe. While most citizens supported governments’ containment measures, others took to the streets and voiced their dissatisfaction. The article focuses on the mobilisation potential related to this heterogenous protest wave. It examines individuals that show sympathy and are willing to engage in anti-containment demonstrations based on 16 waves of a rolling cross-section survey fielded in Germany in 2020/2021. The results show a considerable and stable mobilisation potential: every fifth respondent sympathises with the protesters, and around 60% of those are ready to participate themselves. Political distrust, far-right orientations and an emerging ‘freedom divide’ structure the potential, as do Covid-19-related economic and health threats. Moreover, the findings indicate a radicalisation process and show how ideology and threat perceptions drive the step from sympathy to willingness to participate, suggesting that ideological polarisation may quickly spill over to the streets given an appropriate supply of protest opportunities.
American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 2023
This paper considers the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on right-wing populists' constructions of German collective identity. In their "Covid-19 crisis" narratives, German populists attempted to rearrange the discursive and institutional space of the German civil sphere through a symbolic inversion of the heroic signifier and legitimization of violence against perceived enemies. To analyze such discursive dynamics, this paper utilizes multilayered narrative analysis, drawing on the synthesis of civil sphere theory, the anthropological conceptualization of the relationship between mimetic crisis and symbolic substitution of violence and the sociological narrative theory of the sacralization and desacralization of heroism. This analysis structures the investigation of positive and negative symbolic constructions of German collective identity by German right-wing populist narratives. The analysis shows that although German right-wing populists are politically peripheral, their affective, antagonistic and anti-elite narratives contribute to the semantic erosion of the liberal democratic core of the German civil sphere. This in turn reduces the ability of democratic institutions to control violence and leads to the restriction of civil solidarity.
Right-wing violence and the public sphere in Germany: the dynamics of discursive opportunities
2002
This paper uses data on collective violence against immigrants from contemporary Germany to explore the link between violence and the public discourse. We argue that media attention for radical right violence, as well as public reactions by third-party actors to radical-right violence may encourage or discourage violent acts in a number of ways. Using a crosssectional and time-series design that analyzes event counts, we find that differential public visibility, resonance, and legitimacy of right-wing violence amplify the rate of some types of violence, while diminishing the rate of other types of violence. Although this study concerns the role of public discourse on rates of anti-foreigner activity in Germany specifically, we argue that substantial benefits might result from extending this type of analysis on the impact of public discourse to collective action and social movements in other settings and time periods.
New Contentious Politics. Civil Society, Social Movements, and the Polarisation of German Politics
German Politics, 2022
In this Special Issue, we show that the study of civil society, social movements, and protest is central for assessing the current state of German politics. First, moving beyond political parties and electoral politics delivers crucial insights into the ideological, affective, and organisational structuring of emerging polarisation and cleavages. Second, the transformations in electoral politics are closely interrelated with dynamics in civil society. Building on these perspectives, the contributions to the Special Issue underline that, due to the emergence of new cleavages, Germany, like other European countries, has seen a double transformation of its landscape of political contestation: ‘New contentious politics’ is on the rise, marked by new issues and claims as well as hybrid organisational forms and close interactions between protest and electoral politics. Importantly, in contrast to long-held assumptions, protest is not the exclusive terrain of ‘progressive’ forces and not shaped by increasingly differentiated arenas of mobilisation. Based on a broad range of cases and methods, the contributions take stock of social movement and civil society activism in Germany since the 2000s, i.e. in an era of multiple crises and increasing polarisation.