Between Islam, Politics, and Democracy: The Political Ideology of Partai Keadilan Sejahtera (PKS) (original) (raw)
Related papers
Moving towards a Normalised Path: Political Islam in Contemporary Indonesia
As the largest predominantly Muslim country of the globe, Indonesia nearly achieves two decades of its democratisation wave since the downfall of the Authoritarian Rule in 1998. Most scholars argue that the democratisation in Indo-nesia today is situated by the fact that it is unlikely to suffer a regression, but its developments have slow paces towards an embedded democracy for years to come. Political parties, one of the crucial democratic institutions, have a significant responsibility to maintain the democratic system as they are the sole official representatives to create leaders and policies in the government. In accordance with this, political Islam nonetheless has its strategic role to establish the fate and future of Indonesia as a Muslim state outside the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) countries. This paper portrays the trajectory of political Islam in Indonesia particularly Islam-based parties slightly under two decades since Post-New Order regime. Islam-based parties have a potential to be a moderate-official force in the government. It could be proven by the threefold indicator. First is the ripeness of Islam-based parties in coping with both internal and external stimuli such as the leadership change and elite conflicts, the constitutional reform and the electoral result. Second is the role of Muslim political forces in the parliament particularly in addressing the policy-making of controversial bills. Third is the involvement of Islam-based parties in the administration cabinet. To sum up, by applying the analytical framework on the party goal, political Islam in Indonesia has three distinctive features: As " the vote-seekers " in the election, as " the issue-advocates " in the legislature and as " the office-seekers " in the executive. These denote to a normalised path of political Islam in reaching out the embedded democracy.
2011
Why do some religious parties survive after adopting a moderate ideological outlook while others do not? The rise and fall of religious parties since the onset of democratic transition in Indonesia has set off an intriguing debate over the role and future of political Islam in electoral politics. This article seeks to explain the diverging -and unexpected -trajectories of the two most prominent religious parties, the National Awakening Party (PKB) and Justice Prosperous Party (PKS) through a close examination of the case of PKB. It emphasizes organizational qualities to advance two claims. First, the decline of the moderate PKB is the result of the permeation of personality-based clientelistic and ascriptive relations as well as lack of party institutionalization. Political survival of the puritanical Islamist PKS, on the other hand, is explained by organizational cohesion achieved through party institutionalization. Second, a disciplined party structure has allowed PKS elites to achieve controversial ideological adjustments. In short, a moderate centralist religious ideology or outlook alone is not sufficient to achieve political survival in the competitive environment of electoral and religious politics.
Indonesian Democracy and the Transformation of Political Islam
We propose an analytical framework for understanding the relationship between democracy and political Islam in Indonesia. We argue that three rounds of democratic elections in Indonesia have produced two distinct but fundamentally related outcomes: the normalization of Islamist party politics alongside what we tentatively call stealth Islamization. This paper outlines our argument, distinguishes it from existing approaches to political Islam and democracy in contemporary Indonesia, and outlines the evidence that we will use to support it in what we envision to be a booklength project.
Islamism and Contemporary Indonesian Islamic Politics
Jurnal Adabiyah
After the 2019 election, Indonesia is facing changes in political and religious life. In political life, the use of ethnic identity appears as a voter. Meanwhile, in terms of religion, the forces of Islamic conservatism and populism have emerged that have disrupted electoral democracy. The issue of identity politics, Islamic conservatism and populism will continue to grow if the moderate Islamic forces of Muhammadiyah and NU do not appear in political and religious life. The hope of a civilized and non-discriminatory democratic life in the strength of moderate Islam. If the power of moderate Islam is weak, then the power of Islamic conservatism with the power of identity politics and Islamic populism will become a real form of challenge to Indonesian democracy. This article aims to explain the three main challenges of Indonesian democracy after the 2019 Presidential Election, namely the rise of Identity politics; the rise of political Islamism which is compounded in Indonesian polit...
Politik Islam di Indonesia: Ideologi, Transformasi dan Prospek dalam Proses Politik Terkini
Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review, 2016
Penelitian ini bertujuan melihat korelasi doktrin Islam mengenai konsep negara dan sistem pemerintahan dengan cita-cita sebagian umat Islam untuk menghidupkan nilainilai syariah dalam negara. Studi pustaka digunakan untuk menggali ide dan gagasan para pemikir politik Islam mulai dari era klasik dan pertengahan seperti al-Farabi, al-Mawardi, Ibnu Taimiyah, hingga pemikir era modern dan kontemporer seperti al-Attas, Fazlur Rahman, dan Arkoun. Keabsahan sistem demokrasi dan bentuk negara yang ideal bagi kaum muslimin menjadi bahan perdebatan para pemikir Islam. Konsep civil society sebagai manifestasi masyarakat madani diyakini telah dipraktikkan dalam periode sejarah pemerintahan Islam.