Consumer Judgment of Morally-Questionable Behaviors: The Relationship Between Ethical and Legal Judgments (original) (raw)
Related papers
ACR North American Advances, 2006
The paper complements existing research on ethical consumer behavior by examining how people cope with the psychological tensions that arise when they behave in ways that are in apparent contradiction to their expressed ethical concerns. It advances the concept of neutralization-justifications that soften or eliminate the impact that norm-violating behavior might have upon self-concept and social relationships-and presents hypotheses on the role of neutralization in ethical consumer decision making processes.
Contextual bias in ethical judgment of marketing practices
Psychology and Marketing, 1996
Human judgment is susceptible to contextual biases, yet most ethical models in marketing do not indicate how context influences decision making. The authors illustrate how ethical judgments of marketing practices can be influenced by contextually induced frames of reference. Scenarios describing ethical or unethical marketing practices are used in two experiments to prime subjects who subsequently rated the ethics of a target scenario. The target tends to be rated as more ethical by subjects primed with descriptions of unethical practices, and less ethical by subjects primed with descriptions of ethical practices. Moreover, this contrast effect is contingent upon the interplay of innate and induced moderating factors. Subjects with high needs for cognition that are unaware of the potential bias induced by contextual priming are prone to the contrast effect. Awareness of the priming induced bias mitigates contrast effects among high need for cognition subjects. Implications for ethical decision making and further psychological research in marketing are discussed. 01996
2015
Consumer engagement in the marketplace is an area of sustained interest. The study investigated a proposed consumer punishment model in the context of thirdparty observed injustice situations. More specifically, the study provides an understanding of how the constructs of magnitude of consequences, attribution of responsibility, customer commitment, identification with victim, perceived injustice, and involvement in social issue, impact on behavioural intention, in the
The Impact of Ethical Considerations in Purchase Behavior: a propaedeutic to further research
Many organizations assume that having a good ethical reputation often has an impact on consumers' responses to a service or product. The research reported in this paper sought to confirm this intuition by investigating: 1) consumers' attitudes about the ethics of corporate behavior in relation to stockholders, customers (middlemen and ultimate consumers), suppliers, employees, and host communities; 2) consumer willingness to reward ethical firms through purchase decisions; and 3) the impact of the consumers' attitudes towards corporate ethical behavior on company behavior. The results indicate that the consumers do care about corporate ethical behavior towards all groups of people and they will reward the firms that behave ethically via their purchase decision. This suggests that corporate ethics is important to the consumers and provides ethical firms with a marketplace advantage.
Consumers' evaluative structures in two ethical situations: A means-end approach
Journal of Business Research, 1991
In this paper, we examine differences in consumers' means-end chain knowledge structures that are developed during the evaluation of a seller's prior ethical/unethical behavior. Independent measures of personal list of values (terminal values) were obtained from undergraduate subjects prior to the presentation of one of two treatment scenarios. Reading one version, subjects made judgments regarding unethical business behavior, but were told that they were not personally affected by the misconduct. The second treatment group was told that they were victims of the unethical business behavior. The subjects were measured, post-treatment on ethical orientation (instrumental values) and ethical evaluation (consequence), and decision outcomes were taken using normal questionnaire techniques. These were analyzed using correlative statistical analysis. Comparisons revealed marked differences between means-end chain structures utilized when the ethical situation has personal versus social (nonpersonal) consequences to the subjects. This study suggests that means-end analysis may hold promise as a tool to better understand the process through which the individual utilizes chunks of associated information, or causal schema, in decision making.
Rationalizing Ethically Questionable Intentions: An Investigation of Marketing Practices in the USA
2012
In this research, a model for ethically questionable decision-making is developed by amalgamating several decision-making theories. The variables of interest are the techniques of neutralization, perceived moral intensity, Machiavellianism, unethical intentions, and ethical judgment. Using a sample of 276 U.S. marketing professionals, partial least squares structural equation modelling was used to validate the model. Findings reveal that U.S. marketing professionals rationalize their ethically questionable intentions through their: (1) perception of moral intensity (i.e., minimizing the harms on others, perceiving their selfinterest as most salient, and indifference to social consensus), (2) reliance on various neutralization techniques, and; (3) judgment of their ethically questionable intentions as ethical. After controlling for the Machiavellian personality trait, Machiavellianism did not have a profound effect on the decision-making process, which implies that marketers, in general, are capable of the cognitive distortions found in this study.
Effects of Information About Firms’ Ethical and Unethical Actions on Consumers’ Attitudes
Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1999
Three experiments examined the manner in which consumers are influenced by information about firms' ethical behaviors and product attribute information when forming attitudes toward the firm. Confirming principles drawn from evaluations of individuals, results showed that a superior product attribute enhances attitudes toward ethically behaving firms more than toward unethically behaving firms. Furthermore, consumers' attitudes toward superior products differed depending on the type of ethical behavior enacted by the firm-whether refraining from unethical behavior or acting prosocially. However, when a product attribute was inferior, firms' ethics had less impact.