Reclamation of the Narrative for the Silenced Voice in Margaret Atwood's The Penelopiad (original) (raw)

Abstract

This article analyzes Margaret Atwood's The Penelopiad, a rewriting of Homeric epic, The Odyssey. Atwood rewrites the storythe saga of gallantry and triumphalism of Odysseus, with narrative shift that brings postmodern irony and parody, self-reflexivity and metafiction, and intertextuality and paratextuality into play. The article tries explore if Atwood's shifting of narrative orientation of the Homeric epic yields any different and substantial reception and interpretation of the epic in the recent context.Moreover, I demonstrate how Atwood's reconstruction and subsequently the empowerment of the minor characters unfolds the incompatibilities and discrepancies the official version of Homer's epic, and brings the marginal voice to the front by granting a variety of narrative access.I argue, giving subject positions to silent agents and using various genres of expression, for instance, history and myth, Atwood, through the deployment of an autodiegetic narrative, brings together gender, genre and language in such a way that results in a decisive shift in conceptualizing the narrative structure for the marginal voice and agency female characters. The article concludes that why rereading of classical and canonical text is crucial to bring the marginals' claim to a subject position, and produce a different language and literature that allows space for expression subjectivity of characters on the margins.

Key takeaways

sparkles

AI

  1. Atwood's The Penelopiad reinterprets The Odyssey, emphasizing marginalized voices and narrative complexity.
  2. The article explores narrative shifts that empower minor characters, especially Penelope and the twelve maids.
  3. Atwood utilizes metafiction and intertextuality, allowing for a critique of patriarchal narratives in Homeric texts.
  4. By combining parody and irony, Atwood questions the authenticity of the Homeric accounts and introduces alternative truths.
  5. The text advocates for the importance of revisiting classical literature to give voice to the silenced and marginalized.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (29)

  1. Atwood Margaret. The Penelopiad. Conongate Book, 2005.
  2. Badley, Linda. "The Aesthetics of Postmodern Parody: An Extended Definition." The Comparatist, vol. 7, 1983, pp. 36-47. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/44366698\. Accessed 18 June 2020.
  3. Bakhtin, M.M. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M.M. Bakhtin. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Ed. Michael Holquist, University of Texas Press, 1981.
  4. Booth, Wayne C. The Rhetoric of Fiction. University of Chicago Press, 2010.
  5. Collins, Shannon Carpenter. "Setting the Stories Straight: A Reading of Margaret Atwood's The Penelopiad." Carson-Newman Studies, vol. 11, 2006, pp. 57-66.
  6. Cuddon, John Anthony. The Penguin Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory. Penguin Beds Group, 1992.
  7. Currie, Mark. Postmodern Narrative Theory. Macmillan International Higher Education, 2010.
  8. Ermarth, Elizabeth Deeds. "Finger exercises: Parody as a practice for postmodernity." European Journal of English Studies, vol. 3, no.2, 1999, pp. 226-240.
  9. Genette, Gärard. Palimpsests: Literature in the second degree. vol. 8, U of Nebraska Press, 1997.
  10. Gilbert, Sandra M., and Susan Gubar. The madwoman in the attic: The woman writer and the nineteenth-century literary imagination. Veritas Paperbacks, 2020.
  11. Hauser, Emily. "'There is another story': writing after the Odyssey in Margaret Atwood's The Penelopiad." Classical Receptions Journal, vol.10, no.2, 2018, pp. 109-126.
  12. Homer. The Odyssey. Trans. Robert Fagales. Punguin, 1997.
  13. Howells, Coral Ann. "Five Ways of Looking at The Penelopiad." Sydney Studies in English 32 (2008).
  14. Howells, Coral Ann. "We can't help but be modern': The Penelopiad." Once upon a time: myth, fairy tales and legends in Margaret Atwood's writings (2008): 57-72.
  15. Hutcheon, Linda. "Historiographic Metafiction Parody and the Intertextuality of History." Johns Hopkins University, 1989.
  16. ---. "Incredulity toward Metanarrative: Negotiating Postmodernism and Feminisms." Tessera (1989), pp. 39-44.
  17. Hutcheon, Linda. "The Politics of Postmodernism: Parody and History." Cultural Critique, no. 5, 1986, pp. 179-207. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/1354361\. Accessed 29 June 2020.
  18. ---. Double talking: Essays on verbal and visual ironies in Contemporary Canadian art and literature. Ecw Press, 1992.
  19. ---. The Canadian postmodern: a study of contemporary English- Canadian fiction. Oxford University Press, 1988.
  20. Jung, Susanne. "'A Chorus Line': Margaret Atwood's Penelopiad at the Crossroads of Narrative, Poetic and Dramatic Genres." Connotations: A Journal for Critical Debate 24.1 (2014): 41-62.
  21. Kapuscinski, Kiley. "Ways of Sentencing: Female Violence and Narrative Justice in Margaret Atwood's The Penelopiad." Essex Human Rights Review 4.2 (2007).
  22. Knox, Bernard. "Introduction to Homer."The Odyssey. Translated by Robert Fagles, Penguin House, 1996: 13-86.
  23. Kristeva, Julia. "Word, Dialogue, and Novel."Desire and Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art (1980).
  24. Lyotard, Jean-François. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Vol. 10. University of Minnesota Press, 1984.
  25. Renaux, Sigrid. "Margaret Atwood and the Re-invention of Myth in The Penelopiad." Interfaces Brasil/Canadá 11.1 (2011): 67-96.
  26. Rich, Adrienne. "When We Dead Awaken: Writing as Re-Vision." College English, vol. 34, no. 1, 1972, pp. 18-30. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/375215\. Accessed 2 July 2020.
  27. Rosen, Jeremy M. "Minor Characters Have Their Day: The Imaginary and Actual Politics of a Contemporary Genre." Contemporary Literature 54.1 (2013): 139-174.
  28. Worton, Michael, and Judith Still, eds. Intertextuality: Theories and Practices. Manchester University Press, 1991.
  29. Yurttaş, Hatice. "Reading The Penelopiad through Irigaray: Rewriting Female Subjectivity." Journal of Faculty of Letters/Edebiyat Fakultesi Dergisi 34.1 (2017).