Management of metastatic neck node in thyroid carcinoma (original) (raw)

A retrospective study on the efficacy of cervical lymph node dissection in well-differentiated carcinoma of the thyroid

The Japanese Journal of Surgery, 1990

The management of cervical lymph node metastases in welldifferentiated carcinoma of the thyroid is controversial. In our department, from 1963 to 1972, node plucking was performed only in patients with cervical lymphadenopathy whereas, from 1973 to 1983, modified radical neck dissection was therapeutically or electively performed. In order to determine whether the more extensive dissection is adequate, a retrospective analysis was performed using two groups of patients who were managed differently with regard to the treatment of cervical lymph node metastases. From this series of 206 patients with more than five years follow-up, it was found that the rates of survival and lymph node recurrence did not differ between the two groups. However, since the well-differentiated carcinoma of the thyroid has relatively indolent biological behaviour, further long-term follow-up seems to be necessary for demonstrating the efficacy of neck dissection.

Guidelines from the Brazilian society of surgical oncology regarding indications and technical aspects of neck dissection in papillary, follicular, and medullary thyroid cancers

Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Objective: The purpose of these guidelines is to provide specific recommendations for the surgical treatment of neck metastases in patients with papillary, follicular, and medullary thyroid carcinomas. Materials and methods: Recommendations were developed based on research of scientific articles (preferentially meta-analyses) and guidelines issued by international medical specialty societies. The American College of Physicians' Guideline Grading System was used to determine the levels of evidence and grades of recommendations. The following questions were answered: A) Is elective neck dissection indicated in the treatment of papillary, follicular, and medullary thyroid carcinoma? B) When should central, lateral, and modified radical neck dissection be performed? C) Could molecular tests guide the extent of the neck dissection? Results/conclusion: Recommendation 1: Elective central neck dissection is not indicated in patients with cN0 well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma or in those with noninvasive T1 and T2 tumors but may be considered in T3-T4 tumors or in the presence of metastases in the lateral neck compartments. Recommendation 2: Elective central neck dissection is recommended in medullary thyroid carcinoma. Recommendation 3: Selective neck dissection of levels II-V should be indicated to treat neck metastases in papillary thyroid cancer, an approach that decreases the risk of recurrence and mortality. Recommendation 4: Compartmental neck dissection is indicated in the treatment of lymph node recurrence after elective or therapeutic neck dissection; "berry node picking" is not recommended. Recommendation 5: There are currently no recommendations regarding the use of molecular tests in guiding the extent of neck dissection in thyroid cancer.

Central neck dissection in differentiated thyroid cancer: technical notes

Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Società italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale, 2014

Differentiated thyroid cancers may be associated with regional lymph node metastases in 20-50% of cases. The central compartment (VIupper VII levels) is considered to be the first echelon of nodal metastases in all differentiated thyroid carcinomas. The indication for central neck dissection is still debated especially in patients with cN0 disease. For some authors, central neck dissection is recommended for lymph nodes that are suspect preoperatively (either clinically or with ultrasound) and/or for lymph node metastases detected intra-operatively with a positive frozen section. In need of a better definition, we divided the dissection in four different areas to map localization of metastases. In this study, we present the rationale for central neck dissection in the management of differentiated thyroid carcinoma, providing some anatomical reflections on surgical technique, oncological considerations and analysis of complications. Central neck dissection may be limited to the compa...

Management of the Neck in Well-Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

Current Oncology Reports, 2020

Purpose of Review In this narrative review, we discuss the indications for elective and therapeutic neck dissections and the postoperative surveillance and treatment options for recurrent nodal disease in patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer. Recent Findings Increased availability of advanced imaging modalities has led to an increased detection rate of previously occult nodal disease in thyroid cancer. Nodal metastases are more common in young patients, large primary tumors, specific genotypes, and certain histological types. While clinically evident nodal disease in the lateral neck compartments has a significant oncological impact, particularly in the older age group, microscopic metastases to the central or the lateral neck in well-differentiated thyroid cancer do not significantly affect outcome. Summary As patients with clinically evident nodal disease are associated with worse outcomes, they should be treated surgically in order to reduce rates of regional recurrence and improve survival. The benefit of elective neck dissection remains unverified as the impact of microscopic disease on outcomes is not significant. Keywords Lymphatic metastasis. Neck dissection. Thyroid neoplasms This article is part of the Topical Collection on Head and Neck Cancers This article was written by members and invitees of the International Head and Neck Scientific Group (www.IHNSG.com).

Current controversies in the management of neck node metastasis in differentiated thyroid cancer

Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment, 2023

The incidence of nodal metastasis is quite common in well-differentiated thyroid cancer. However, its clinical significance is generally quite minimal. The adverse pathological features need to be recognized. The debate continues over prophylactic central compartment dissection. However, it needs to be re-evaluated in terms of complications of elective procedure. The extent of lateral neck dissection is standardized from level II through level V. Recurrent nodal disease is more likely to be persistent nodal disease. Appropriate preoperative imaging is very crucial. Surgery for recurrent disease needs to be considered based on nodal prognostic factors and location of the disease. The approach of using active surveillance and continuous monitoring is reasonable, especially for recurrence below 1 cm.

American Thyroid Association Consensus Review and Statement Regarding the Anatomy, Terminology, and Rationale for Lateral Neck Dissection in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

Thyroid, 2012

Background: Cervical lymph node metastases from differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) are common. Thirty to eighty percent of patients with papillary thyroid cancer harbor lymph node metastases, with the central neck being the most common compartment involved. The goals of this study were to: (1) identify appropriate methods for determining metastatic DTC in the lateral neck and (2) address the extent of lymph node dissection for the lateral neck necessary to control nodal disease balanced against known risks of surgery. Methods: A literature review followed by formulation of a consensus statement was performed. Results: Four proposals regarding management of the lateral neck are made for consideration by organizations developing management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and DTC including the next iteration of management guidelines developed by the American Thyroid Association (ATA). Metastases to lateral neck nodes must be considered in the evaluation of the newly diagnosed thyroid cancer patient and for surveillance of the previously treated DTC patient. Conclusions: Lateral neck lymph nodes are a significant consideration in the surgical management of patients with DTC. When current guidelines formulated by the ATA and by other international medical societies are followed, initial evaluation of the DTC patient with ultrasound (or other modalities when indicated) will help to identify lateral neck lymph nodes of concern. These findings should be addressed using fine-needle aspiration biopsy. A comprehensive neck dissection of at least nodal levels IIa, III, IV, and Vb should be performed when indicated to optimize disease control.

Central neck dissection in papillary thyroid carcinoma: Results of a retrospective study

International Journal of Surgery, 2014

Aims of the study: The aim of this retrospective study was to appraise the impact of central neck dissection (CND) when treating papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) and identifying predictors of tumour recurrence by analysing the results and complications related to this surgical procedure. Materials and methods: The study examined the histories of 347 patients with PTC, divided into two groups: group A including 284 patients who underwent total thyroidectomy (TT) only; group B including 63 patients who underwent TT and CND and possible lateral neck dissection (LND). Results: The patients in the B group were younger than those in the A group (an average of 44.5 vs. 48.6; p ¼ 0.03) and their tumours were larger (1.91 cm vs 1.27 cm, p ¼ 0.001). Multifocality, extra-capsular extensions of the neoplastic mass and high cell histological variant were more prevalent in the B group. The incidence of permanent hyperparathyroidism was higher in group B than in group A (25.4% vs 9.5%, p ¼ 0.0006). Recurrence of disease and the numbers requiring reoperation were also higher in group B: (24.1% in group B vs 6.6 in group A, p < 0.0001). Patients classified as clinically N0 at their first operation and who were most probably clinically N1, totalled 6.6%. Conclusions: Our data show that only extra-capsular extension may be considered a predictor of recurrence. The findings of our study support the idea of carrying out "therapeutic" CND only in cases of preoperative or macroscopic intraoperative clinical evidence of lymph-node involvement.

Neck Surgery for Non-Well Differentiated Thyroid Malignancies: Variations in Strategy According to Histopathology

Cancers

Lymph node metastases in non-well differentiated thyroid cancer (non-WDTC) are common, both in the central compartment (levels VI and VII) and in the lateral neck (Levels II to V). Nodal metastases negatively affect prognosis and should be treated to maximize locoregional control while minimizing morbidity. In non-WDTC, the rate of nodal involvement is variable and depends on the histology of the tumor. For medullary thyroid carcinomas, poorly differentiated thyroid carcinomas, and anaplastic thyroid carcinomas, the high frequency of lymph node metastases makes central compartment dissection generally necessary. In mucoepidermoid carcinomas, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, sarcomas, and malignant thyroid teratomas or thyroblastomas, central compartment dissection is less often necessary, as clinical lymphnode involvement is less common. We aim to summarize the medical literature and the opinions of several experts from different parts of the world on the current philosophy...

Management of the neck in differentiated thyroid cancer

Surgical oncology clinics of North America, 2008

Differentiated thyroid cancer is characterized by an excellent long-term prognosis, which unlike other head and neck carcinomas, is not influenced definitively by regional lymph node metastasis. The relative rarity of the disease, together with its tendency for delayed metastasis and its low mortality, makes a prospective randomized trial comparing treatment outcomes difficult. As a result, the effect of cervical lymph node metastases on survival is unclear, making meaningful recommendations for their management somewhat subjective. This article discusses guidelines for the management of the neck in differentiated.