A Clinical Diagnosis of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Patients with Voice related Problems via Correlation between Reflux Symptoms and Laryngoscopic Findings (original) (raw)
Related papers
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: Is It the Real Culprit in Patients with Laryngeal Complaints?
International Journal of Phonosurgery and Laryngology, 2017
Aim The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in patients with laryngeal complaints and study the correlation between reflux symptom index (RSI) and reflux finding score (RFS). Materials and methods This is a study of 104 patients, who presented in the ear, nose, and throat outpatient department at the Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad, India, from April 2015 to April 2016, with complaints like change of voice, chronic cough, foreign body sensation, throat clearing, difficulty swallowing, and regurgitation. All the patients were examined with 90° endoscope by a single examiner, and an RSI ≥13 was considered as indicative of reflux. Observation and discussion The mean age of the 104 patients was 47.2 years. The male-female ratio was 1:1.8. The RSI ranged from 5 to 44, with a mean of 22.99 and standard deviation (SD) of 7.43. The RFS ranged from 4 to 22, with a mean of 11.04 and SD of 3.07. Both the parameters showed high correlation (correlation coeffici...
Reflux and laryngitis: A systematic review
Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2007
To investigate and compare the prevalence of pharyngeal reflux (PR) events in normal controls and patients with clinically diagnosed reflux laryngitis. METHOD: A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify all prospective studies on the results of 24-hour doubleprobe (pharyngeal and esophageal) pH monitoring in normal controls and in patients with symptoms and/or signs of reflux laryngitis. RESULTS: Eleven relevant studies on 192 normal controls and 13 studies on 512 patients with reflux laryngitis were identified. One or more PR events were detected in 51 normal controls (22.9%; 95% CI, 13.9% to 33.3%) and in 154 of 422 patients (38.3%; 95% CI, 25.4% to 52.1%). There is no significant difference in the prevalence of PR events between normal controls and patients with reflux laryngitis (P ϭ 0.079). In addition, the prevalence of PR events in patients with reflux laryngitis is much lower than reported in previous reviews on this subject. CONCLUSION: This systematic review calculated that (1) only a minority of patients with clinically diagnosed reflux laryngitis will show PR events, and (2) there is no significant difference between the prevalence of PR events in patients with reflux laryngitis and healthy controls. At the moment, there is no reliable means to confirm reflux of gastric juice in patients with suspected reflux laryngitis. This diagnostic vacuum is fundamental and may pose important questions at the current concept of reflux of gastric juice as a common cause of laryngopharyngeal inflammation.
Acoustic Analysis Findings in Objective Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patients
Journal of Voice, 2007
Objective: The aim of this study was to identify the effects of objective laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) on the acoustic parameters of patients by comparing their voice samples with that of control subjects. Study Design: Prospective study in two tertiary reference hospitals. Methods: 48 consecutive patients with symptoms related to LPR and 64 control subjects were included in the study. Suspected LPR patients underwent a 24-hour ambulatory pH monitoring, and 25 (52%) of them were shown to have objective LPR. Acoustical evaluation results of objective LPR patients were compared with that of symptomatic LPR patients and control subjects. Results: All frequency perturbation values obtained from objective and symptomatic LPR patients were higher than the control subjects (P ! 0.01). Mean fundamental frequency, amplitude perturbation measures, and noise-to-harmonics ratio were not significantly different between groups. Conclusion: LPR patients have significantly different frequency perturbation values than control subjects.