HUMAN RIGHTS MANUAL FOR PALESTINIAN LAWYERS: Identifying, Investigating and Prosecuting Human Rights Violations (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Applicability of Human Rights Conventions to Israel and to the Occupied Territories
Israel Law Review, 1992
The recent ratification of the Convention on the Rights of the Child by the Israeli Government is part of a welcome effort to ratify multilateral conventions dealing with human rights, some of which Israel had signed long ago. In addition to this Convention, the Israeli Government ratified, during the summer of 1991, the 1966 Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the 1966 Covenant on Economic and Social Rights, the 1979 Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, and the 1984 Convention Against Torture. On the occasion of the ratification of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, this article discusses the legal implications of the ratification of human rights conventions to the Israeli legal system and to the legal systems in the occupied territories.
Human rights gaps in the Palestinian criminal system: a United Nations role?
The International Journal of Human Rights, 2012
The Palestinian Authority has no obligation under human rights treaties. The authority is not required, as such, to report to the United Nations treaty-bodies. People under Palestinian jurisdiction cannot resort to these bodies for remedies. Yet the Authority should not be left treating some four-million individuals without international supervision. Such supervision could be based on the general and customary law, soft international law, and the applicable domestic law in Palestine. This article evaluates the existing substantive criminal law, as a case-in-point regarding human rights deficiencies in the areas under the jurisdiction of the Palestinians. It offers ways of potential international monitoring over the Palestinian Authority's human rights performance. It provides an analysis with a view to bringing the Palestinian criminal system in line with international law. It focuses on the role that can be played by the United Nations human rights mechanisms, including the Special Procedures and the High Commissioner for Human Rights. The article tracks criminal law under five themes: capital punishment; torture; 'honour' crimes; security crimes; and restrictions on the freedom of association.
THE FUTURE OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE HUMAN RIGHT 129 TO A FUTURE IN PALESTINE
Soft Power
Reflecting on the Palestinian experience, this article discusses the requirements of ensuring a development of human rights that exceeds the growth of their abuse allowing them to play a role in reshaping the world through fostering emancipatory processes. It looks at the human rights system in the current global context, the caveats of human rights, their limitations, potential in their historic context, current conditions, and their perspectives concerning enabling emancipation. The article makes the claim that sufficient basis exists in the human rights concepts, system, and history to overcome the current limitations and counter their battering through their further development on a basis of human solidarity. Such a transformation can warrant a future for human rights in Palestine.
ILAF Studies, 2002
This inquiry explores Israel’s violations of the Palestinians’ national rights, negligence of United Nations resolutions, and transgression of the conventions and agreements of the international human rights law. The study concludes by confirming the Palestinians’ right to self-determination based on the settled principle of the law of nations that an occupying power does not acquire sovereignty over the occupied territory, nor does its occupation destroy or extinguish the sovereignty of the legitimate sovereign nation. However, the only legitimate, legally acceptable solution to the situation in the occupied territories will be Israel’s withdrawal from the territories occupied on June 5, 1967, and declaration of an independent Palestinian national state.
PERFORMING HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN CONFLICT
Why is it that distinct academic disciplines sometimes have a hard time understanding each other? The discussions at the law faculty of the VU University Amsterdam and the University of Amsterdam on 20 and 21 April 2017 with the authors of the book ‘The human right to dominate’1 - Nicola Perugini and Neve Gordon - showed that legal scholars and social-political scholars have a different understanding of human rights (i.e. what human rights are). More so, social-political scholars, such as Perugini and Gordon seem to be more interested in the consequences of invoking the human rights beyond the immediate legal setting of a national or international court (i.e. what human rights do).