Climate and predation dominate juvenile and adult recruitment in a turtle with temperature‐dependent sex determination (original) (raw)

Abstract

Conditions experienced early in life can influence phenotypes in ecologically important ways, as exemplified by organisms with environmental sex determination. For organisms with temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD), variation in nest temperatures induces phenotypic variation that could impact population growth rates. In environments that vary over space and time, how does this variation influence key demographic parameters (cohort sex ratio and hatchling recruitment) in early life stages of populations exhibiting TSD? We leverage a 17-year data set on a population of painted turtles, Chrysemys picta, to investigate how spatial variation in nest vegetation cover and temporal variation in climate influence early life-history demography. We found that spatial variation in nest cover strongly influenced nest temperature and sex ratio, but was not correlated with clutch size, nest predation, total nest failure, or hatching success. Temporal variation in climate influenced percentage of total nest failure and cohort sex ratio, but not depredation rate, mean clutch size, or mean hatching success. Total hatchling recruitment in a year was influenced primarily by temporal variation in climate-independent factors, number of nests constructed, and depredation rate. Recruitment of female hatchlings was determined by stochastic variation in nest depredation and annual climate and also by the total nest production. Overall population demography depends more strongly on annual variation in climate and predation than it does on the intricacies of nest-specific biology. Finally, we demonstrate that recruitment of female hatchlings translates into recruitment of breeding females into the population, thus linking climate (and other) effects on early life stages to adult demographics.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (67)

  1. Bowden, R. M., M. A. Ewert, and C. E. Nelson. 2000. Environmental sex determination in a reptile varies season- ally and with yolk hormones. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 267:1745-1749.
  2. Bowden, R. M., H. K. Harms, R. T. Paitz, and F. J. Janzen. 2004. Does optimal egg size vary with demographic stage because of a physiological constraint? Functional Ecology 18: 522-529.
  3. Bowen, K. D., and F. J. Janzen. 2005. Rainfall and depredation of nests of the painted turtle, Chrysemys picta. Journal of Herpetology 39:649-652.
  4. Bronikowski, A. M., M. E. Clark, F. H. Rodd, and D. N. Reznick. 2002. Population-dynamic consequences of preda- tor-induced life history variation in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Ecology 83:2194-2204.
  5. Bull, J. J., and M. G. Bulmer. 1989. Longevity enhances selection of environmental sex determination. Heredity 63: 315-320.
  6. Bulmer, M. G., and J. J. Bull. 1982. Models of polygenic sex determination and sex ratio control. Evolution 36:13-26.
  7. Burke, V. J., S. L. Rathbun, J. R. Bodie, and J. W. Gibbons. 1998. Effect of density on predation rate for turtle nests in a complex landscape. Oikos 83:3-11.
  8. Congdon, J. D., R. D. Nagle, O. M. Kinney, R. C. van Loben Sels, T. Quinter, and D. W. Tinkle. 2003. Testing hypothesis of aging in long-lived painted turtles (Chrysemys picta). Experimental Gerontology 38:765-772.
  9. Conover, D. O. 1984. Adaptive significance of temperature- dependent sex determination in a fish. American Naturalist 123:297-313.
  10. Conover, D. O., D. A. Van Voorhees, and A. Ehtisham. 1992. Sex ratio selection and the evolution of environmental sex determination in laboratory populations of Menidia menidia. Evolution 46:1722-1730.
  11. Crouse, D. T., L. B. Crowder, and H. Caswell. 1987. A stage- based population model for loggerhead sea turtles and implications for conservation. Ecology 68:1412-1423.
  12. Deeming, D. C. 2004. Reptilian incubation: environment, evolution and behaviour. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.
  13. Doody, J. S., A. Georges, and J. E. Young. 2004. Determinants of reproductive success and offspring sex in a turtle with environmental sex determination. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 81:1-16.
  14. Doody, J. S., E. Guarino, A. Georges, B. Corey, G. Murray, and M. A. Ewert. 2006a. Nest site choice compensates for climate effects on sex ratios in a lizard with environmental sex determination. Evolutionary Ecology 20:307-330.
  15. Doody, J. S., E. Guarino, P. S. Harlow, B. Corey, and G. Murray. 2006b. Quantifying nest site choice in reptiles using hemispherical photography and gap light analysis. Herpeto- logical Review 37:49-52.
  16. Ernst, C. H., and J. E. Lovich. 2009. Turtles of the United States and Canada. Second edition. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
  17. Ewert, M. A., C. R. Etchberger, and C. E. Nelson. 2004. Turtle sex-determining modes and TSD patterns, and some TSD pattern correlates. Pages 21-32 in N. Valenzuela and V. Lance, editors. Temperature-dependent sex determination in vertebrates. Smithsonian, Washington, D.C., USA.
  18. Freedberg, S., and D. R. Bowne. 2006. Monitoring juveniles across years reveals non-Fisherian sex ratios in a reptile with environmental sex determination. Evolutionary Ecology Research 8:1499-1510.
  19. Girondot, M., V. Delmas, P. Rivalan, F. Courchamp, A.-C. Prevot-Julliard, and M. H. Godfrey. 2004. Implications of temperature-dependent sex determination for population dynamics. Pages 148-155 in N. Valenzuela and V. Lance, editors. Temperature-dependent sex determination in verte- brates. Smithsonian, Washington, D.C., USA.
  20. Girondot, M., H. Fouillet, and C. Pieau. 1998. Feminizing turtle embryos as a conservation tool. Conservation Biology 12:353-362.
  21. Godfrey, M. H., R. Barreto, and N. Mrosovsky. 1996. Estimating past and present sex ratios of sea turtles in Suriname. Canadian Journal of Zoology 74:267-277.
  22. Gutzke, W. H. N., and D. Crews. 1988. Embryonic temperature determines adult sexuality in a reptile. Nature 332:832-834.
  23. Harms, H. K., R. T. Paitz, R. M. Bowden, and F. J. Janzen. 2005. Age and season impact resource allocation to eggs and nesting behavior in the painted turtle. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 78:996-1004.
  24. Heppell, S. S. 1998. Application of life-history theory and population model analysis to turtle conservation. Copeia 1998:367-375.
  25. Heppell, S. S., L. B. Crowder, and D. T. Crouse. 1996. Models to evaluate headstarting as a management tool for long-lived turtles. Ecological Application 6:556-565.
  26. Horvitz, C. C., and D. W. Schemske. 1995. Spatiotemporal variation in demographic transitions of a tropical understory herb: projection matrix analysis. Ecological Monographs 65: 155-192.
  27. Janzen, F. J. 1994a. Climate change and temperature-depen- dent sex determination in reptiles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 91:7487-7490.
  28. Janzen, F. J. 1994b. Vegetational cover predicts the sex ratio of hatchling turtles in natural nests. Ecology 75:1593-1599.
  29. Janzen, F. J. 1995. Experimental evidence for the evolutionary significance of temperature dependent sex determination. Evolution 49:864-873.
  30. Janzen, F. J., and C. L. Morjan. 2001. Repeatability of microenvironment-specific nesting behaviour in a turtle with environmental sex determination. Animal Behaviour 62:73- 82.
  31. Janzen, F. J., and G. L. Paukstis. 1991. Environmental sex determination in reptiles: ecology, evolution, and experimen- tal design. Quarterly Review of Biology 66:149-179.
  32. Kolbe, J. J., and F. J. Janzen. 2002. Spatial and temporal dynamics of turtle nest predation: edge effects. Oikos 99:538- 544. McGaugh, S. E., L. E. Schwanz, R. M. Bowden, J. E. Gonzalez, and F. J. Janzen. 2010. Inheritance of nesting behaviour across natural environmental variation in a turtle with temperature-dependent sex determination. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 277:1219-1226.
  33. Meehl, G. A., et al. 2007. Global climate projections. Pages 747-845 in S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. B. Averyt, M. Tignor, and H. L. Miller, editors. Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  34. Mitchell, N. J., M. R. Kearney, N. J. Nelson, and W. P. Porter. 2008. Predicting the fate of a living fossil: How will global warming affect sex determination and hatching phenology in tuatara? Proceedings of the Royal Society B 275:2185-2193.
  35. Moll, E. O. 1973. Latitudinal and interspecific variation in reproduction of the painted turtle, Chrysemys picta. Herpe- tologica 29:307-318.
  36. Morjan, C. L. 2003a. How rapidly can maternal behavior affecting primary sex ratio evolve in a reptile with environmental sex determination? American Naturalist 162: 205-219.
  37. Morjan, C. L. 2003b. Variation in nesting patterns affecting nest temperatures in two populations of painted turtles (Chrysemys picta) with temperature-dependent sex determi- nation. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 53:254-261.
  38. Morjan, C. L., and F. J. Janzen. 2003. Nest temperature is not related to egg size in a turtle with temperature-dependent sex determination. Copeia 2003:366-372.
  39. Morris, W. F., et al. 2008. Longevity can buffer plant and animal populations against changing climatic variability. Ecology 89:19-25.
  40. Mrosovsky, N., and C. Pieau. 1991. Transitional range of temperature, pivotal temperatures and thermosensitive stages for sex determination in reptiles. Amphibia-Reptilia 12:169- 179. Nakaoka, M. 1996. Dynamics of age-and size-structures population in fluctuating environments: applications of stochastic matrix models to natural populations. Researches on Population Ecology 38:141-152.
  41. Nations, C. S., and M. S. Boyce. 1997. Stochastic demography for conservation biology. Pages 451-469 in S. Tuljapurkar and H. Caswell, editors. Structured-population models in marine, terrestrial and freshwater systems. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.
  42. Nelson, N. J., M. B. Thompson, S. Pledger, S. N. Keall, and C. H. Daugherty. 2004. Egg mass determines hatchling size, and incubation temperature influences post-hatchling growth, of tuatara Sphenodon punctatus. Journal of Zoology 263:77-87.
  43. Pascarella, J. B., and C. C. Horvitz. 1998. Hurricane disturbance and the population dynamics of a tropical understory shrub: megamatrix elasticity analysis. Ecology 79:547-563.
  44. Robert, K. A., and M. B. Thompson. 2003. Reconstructing thermochron iButtons to reduce size and weight as a new technique in the study of small animal thermal biology. Herpetological Review 34:130-132.
  45. Robert, K. A., M. B. Thompson, and F. Seebacher. 2006. Thermal biology of a viviparous lizard with temperature- dependent sex determination. Journal of Thermal Biology 31: 292-301.
  46. Schwanz, L. E., R. M. Bowden, R.-J. Spencer, and F. J. Janzen. 2009. Nesting ecology and offspring recruitment in a long- lived turtle. Ecology 90:1709-1710.
  47. Schwanz, L. E., and F. J. Janzen. 2008. Climate change and temperature-dependent sex determination: Can individual plasticity in nesting phenology prevent extreme sex ratios? Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 81:826-834.
  48. Schwanz, L. E., F. J. Janzen, and S. R. Proulx. 2010. Sex allocation based on relative and absolute condition. Evolu- tion 64:1331-1345.
  49. Schwanz, L. E., and S. R. Proulx. 2008. Mutual information reveals variation in temperature-dependent sex determination in response to environmental fluctuation, lifespan and selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 275:2441-2448.
  50. Shine, R. 1999. Why is sex determined by nest temperature in many reptiles? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14:186-189.
  51. Spencer, R.-J. 2002. Experimentally testing nest site selection: fitness trade-offs and predation risk in turtles. Ecology 83: 2136-2144.
  52. Spencer, R.-J., F. J. Janzen, and M. B. Thompson. 2006. Counterintuitive density-dependent growth in a long-lived vertebrate after removal of nest predators. Ecology 87:3109- 3118.
  53. Spencer, R.-J., and M. B. Thompson. 2003. The significance of predation in nest site selection of turtles: an experimental consideration of macro-and microhabitat preferences. Oikos 102:592-600.
  54. Spencer, R.-J., and M. B. Thompson. 2005. Experimental analysis of the impact of foxes on freshwater turtle populations. Conservation Biology 19:845-854.
  55. Strickland, J. T., P. L. Colbert, and F. J. Janzen. 2010. An experimental analysis of effects of markers and habitat structure on predation of turtle nests. Journal of Herpetology 44, in press.
  56. Tucker, J. K., C. R. Dolan, J. T. Lamer, and E. A. Dustman. 2008. Climatic warming, sex ratios, and red-eared sliders (Trachemys scripta elegans) in Illinois. Chelonian Conserva- tion and Biology 7:60-69.
  57. Tucker, J. K., N. I. Filoramo, and F. J. Janzen. 1999. Size- biased mortality due to predation in a nesting freshwater turtle, Trachemys scripta. American Midland Naturalist 141: 198-203.
  58. Tuljapurkar, S., C. C. Horvitz, and J. B. Pascarella. 2003. The many growth rates and elasticities of population in random environments. American Naturalist 162:489-502.
  59. Valenzuela, N., and F. J. Janzen. 2001. Nest-site philopatry and the evolution of temperature-dependent sex determination. Evolutionary Ecology Research 3:779-794.
  60. Van Dooren, T. J. M., and O. Leimar. 2003. The evolution of environmental and genetic sex determination in fluctuating environments. Evolution 57:2667-2677.
  61. Wapstra, E., T. Uller, D. L. Sinn, M. Olsson, K. Mazurek, J. Joss, and R. Shine. 2009. Climate effects on offspring sex ratio in a viviparous lizard. Journal of Animal Ecology 78: 84-90.
  62. Warner, D. A., and R. Shine. 2008. The adaptive significance of temperature-dependent sex determination in a reptile. Nature 451:566-569.
  63. Weisrock, D. W., and F. J. Janzen. 1999. Thermal and fitness- related consequences of nest location in painted turtles (Chrysemys picta). Functional Ecology 13:94-101.
  64. Wilbur, H. M. 1975. The evolutionary and mathematical demography of the turtle Chrysemys picta. Ecology 56:64-77.
  65. Wilson, D. S. 1998. Nest-site selection: microhabitat variation and its effects on survival of turtle embryos. Ecology 79: 1884-1892.
  66. Witherington, B., P. Kuilis, B. Brost, and A. Meylan. 2009. Decreasing annual nest counts in a globally important loggerhead sea turtle population. Ecological Applications 19:30-54.
  67. APPENDIX Nest fates and annual sex ratios (Ecological Archives E091-210-A1).