Continuing Challenges in Rural Health in the United States (original) (raw)
Related papers
Reducing Potentially Excess Deaths from the Five Leading Causes of Death in the Rural United States
Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries (Washington, D.C. : 2002), 2017
In 2014, the all-cause age-adjusted death rate in the United States reached a historic low of 724.6 per 100,000 population (1). However, mortality in rural (nonmetropolitan) areas of the United States has decreased at a much slower pace, resulting in a widening gap between rural mortality rates (830.5) and urban mortality rates (704.3) (1). During 1999–2014, annual age-adjusted death rates for the five leading causes of death in the United States (heart disease, cancer, unintentional injury, chronic lower respiratory disease (CLRD), and stroke) were higher in rural areas than in urban (metropolitan) areas (Figure 1). In most public health regions (Figure 2), the proportion of deaths among persons aged <80 years (U.S. average life expectancy) (2) from the five leading causes that were potentially excess deaths was higher in rural areas compared with urban areas (Figure 3). Several factors probably influence the rural-urban gap in potentially excess deaths from the five leading cau...
Rural Healthy People 2010, 2020, and Beyond
Family & Community Health, 2011
Rural Healthy People 2010 represented the first effort to specifically include small and rural communities in the Healthy People movement to improve the health of Americans. Rural Healthy People 2010 set rural-specific health priority areas, documented what is known about health in rural areas, identified rural best practice programs/interventions, and promoted rural health services research and researchers. Over the last decade Rural Healthy People 2010 has provided policy makers, rural providers, and rural communities with a valuable resource for planning and policy making. Sustaining the Rural Healthy People project in collaboration with the broader Healthy People 2020 effort will provide an important infrastructure for improving rural health.
The Journal of Rural Health
To urban city dwellers, rural life can seem idyllic-a slower pace, easy-to-access outdoor recreation, and close ties to family, friends, and the community. What may not be as obvious is the extent to which persistent health disparities plague rural populations. For example, recurring evidence suggests that rural Americans face greater mortality risks from multiple diseases, including cancer, cardiovascular disease, and drug-related injuries. 1,2 In addition, rural Americans are more likely than urban Americans to have low incomes, to have no more than a high school education, to be unemployed, and to be uninsured. 1,3-5 Such data may compel stakeholders to seek to "save rural" by simply extending services and opportunities that exist and work well in urban environments. However, we argue that rural settings are fundamentally different in ways that require more creative thinking in order to optimize health outcomes. In this commentary, we summarize current trends in cancer prevention and control in rural areas and argue that 4 key considerations are needed when working in rural settings to address cancer disparities. There is a growing interest in exploring and addressing health disparities in rural areas, particularly around cancer prevention and control. 6-8 Recently, Henley et al published
Journal of health care for the poor and underserved, 2018
Rural communities often have worse health outcomes, have less access to care, and are less diverse than urban communities. Much of the research on rural health disparities examines disparities between rural and urban communities, with fewer studies on disparities within rural communities. This report provides an overview of racial/ethnic health disparities for selected indicators in rural areas of the United States. 2012-2015. Self-reported data from the 2012-2015 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System were pooled to evaluate racial/ethnic disparities in health, access to care, and health-related behaviors among rural residents in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Using the National Center for Health Statistics 2013 Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties to assess rurality, this analysis focused on adults living in noncore (rural) counties. Racial/ethnic minorities who lived in rural areas were younger (more often in the youngest age group) than non-Hispanic wh...
Eight Ways to Mitigate US Rural Health Inequity
AMA journal of ethics, 2022
Rural residents in the United States are less likely to have dental insurance and more likely to face environmental and geographic barriers to oral health and dental care. This article discusses oral health inequity, evidence of oral health's influence on overall health, and why the primary care workforce is well positioned to provide prevention, screening, and referrals for oral health and dental care. Six strategies by which oral health and dental care are integrated into primary care delivery streams can help mitigate rural health inequity.
Health Education Journal, 2013
Objective: To discuss how the effects of culture, economy, and geographical location intersect to form a gestalt triad determining health-related disparities in rural areas. Methods: We critically profile each component of the deterministic triad in shaping current health-related disparities in rural areas; evaluate the uniquely composed intersections of these disparities in relation to Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-related cancer prevention in three isolated rural Georgia counties; and develop implications for future leadership in rural healthcare research, policy, and practice. Results: The deterministic triad of culture, economy, and geographical location is unique to a rural community, and even if two rural communities experience the same health disparity, each community is likely to have a discretely different composition of cultural, economic, and geographic determinants. Conclusion: The deterministic triad presents a challenge for health policymakers, researchers, and practition...
Addressing health inequalities in diverse, rural communities: An unmet need
SSM - Population Health
Research on rural health needs to represent the diverse demographics of these regions by carefully considering the distinct characteristics, inequities, and stressors occurring in rural communities. Drawing from our own findings and other empirical investigations examining diverse rural communities, we propose several considerations to guide future endeavors toward more inclusive rural health research. These include population-health assessment tools that consider minority stress and intervention strategies designed to reflect both the environmental and socio-cultural contexts of rural residents.
Public Health Rural Health Priorities in America: Where You Stand Depends on Where You Sit
The Journal of Rural Health, 2003
Purpose: To assess levels of agreement on priority areas among state a d local rural health leaders nationwide. Methods: Analysis of responses to a mail survey sent to 999 rural health leaders, with 501 responses. Respondents were asked to rank importance to rural health of focus areas named in Healthy People 2010. Findings: There was substantial agreement on top rural health priorities among state and local rural health leaders across the 50 states. "Access to quality health services" was the top priority among leaders of state-level rural agencies and health associat , local rural public health agencies, rural health clinic d community healtlz centers, and rural hospitals. .it was the top priority across multistate policy initiatives by states sharing similar rural health priorities.