Management education and research: Cultural and philosophical differences between east and west. (original) (raw)
Related papers
The neglect of intracountry cultural variation in international management research
Journal of Business Research, 2003
We examine the importance of regional subcultures and intra-country cultural variation to international management research. We seek to demonstrate that equating 'culture' with 'country' can result in erroneous non-significant findings of cross-national differences and a disregard of cultural similarities across countries that may be relevant to management practice and research. Drawing upon literature from anthropology and sociology, we generate hypotheses (1) about the existence of clearly defined subcultures in six locations in Latin America, and (2) about the relationship between subcultures within and across national and linguistic boundaries. Rokeach Value Survey data from a sample of 368 respondents supported our hypotheses. We discuss the importance to international management research of taking into account both the presence and impact of subcultures.
Cross-cultural Management - from West to East (1)
Actual Problems of Economics
In the globalization era, the cross-cultural issues became subject of many analysis and studies. The paper questions the empirical results and the applicability of consecrated crosscultural models, and suggests other elements that should be analyzed, especially in the East-West context. The very concept of 'cross-cultural management' appears to be a Western product, based on a positivistic approach and using a quantitative methodology. In the first part of the work the authors present a synthesis of four researches related with cultural comparisons between Romania and Russia.
Cross-cultural management education rebooted
Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 2017
Purpose Graduates of cross-cultural management (CCM) courses should be capable of both tackling international and cross-cultural situations and creating positive value from the diversity inherent in these situations. Such value creation is challenging because these situations are typically complex due to differences in cultural values, traditions, social practices, and institutions, such as legal rules, coupled with variation in, for example, wealth and civil rights among stakeholders. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach The authors argue that a scientific mindfulness approach to teaching CCM can help students identify and leverage positive aspects of differences and thereby contribute to positive change in cross-cultural situations. Findings Scientific mindfulness combines mindfulness and scientific thinking with the explicit goal to drive positive change in the world. Originality/value The authors explain how the action principles of scientific mind...
Cross-Cultural Management Research Issues
The research field of cross-cultural management suffers from an absence of theory capable of explaining the role of culture in organizational behavior. Methodological issues that are at least partly responsible for the above shortcoming, are explored in this paper. The central argument is that, despite efforts by researchers to resolve these issues, many methodological problems continue to resist the remedies prescribed by researchers. This paper seeks to evaluate the reasons why, and based on these evaluations, some suggestions for future research are proposed. (JEL M12, M14)
Cross-Cultural Management Studies: State of the Field in the Four Research Paradigms Ã
Cross-cultural management research is often confined to the positivist tradition, which is archetypically illustrated by the seminal work of Hofstede. However, this gives an incomplete overview of the field to which three additional research paradigms contribute: interpretivist, postmodern, and critical. Our ambition is to raise awareness of the presence of multiple paradigms in cross-cultural management research. This meta-theoretical positioning allows researchers to consider the insights and contributions from the different paradigms. We aim to achieve this by presenting a brief overview of the state of the field in each paradigm, thus, stressing areas of studies that enrich our understanding of the interaction between culture and management (at the national, organizational, interpersonal, and individual levels). We then highlight the specific contributions of these four paradigms , drawing especially upon the postmodern and critical works, as they have been repeatedly overlooked in reviews. The article concludes by mentioning how more interactions between the paradigms can be developed and can lead to further knowledge development.
Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 2009
In this paper the colonial history of university education in Hong Kong, and recent changes in the governance of university education driven by global management discourses are discussed. With the systemic penetration of global economic rationalism, Hong Kong university education has gone through structural changes that include funding-linked evaluative policies and practices. Market imperatives and institutionally defined notions of research performance based mainly on English-language, overseas journal publications are exerting strong influence on the cultural practices and life styles of academics and stand to significantly change academic and intellectual culture in higher education in Hong Kong. The long-term consequences of these local interpretations and adaptations of global processes will be discussed in terms of their potential impact on academic freedom, the shaping of intellectual space, the intensification of competitive institutional research output, and the risk of privileging certain forms of knowledge production that puts aside local societal needs, indigenous knowledge and epistemologies. The views of experienced Hong Kong academics in the humanities and social sciences, as expressed in in-depth individual interviews, are also discussed. These are then interpreted with reference to Habermas' notion of different kinds of knowledge-constitutive interests (Habermas 1971) and Foucault's notion of the technology of discipline power to uncover the state's implicit transformation and shaping of the social and epistemological bases of academic and intellectual pursuits and the increasing trend of individualization of intellectual communities into isolated, individualistic, competitive knowledge workers (Foucault 1977).