Sustainable development goals: why do we need them? (original) (raw)
Related papers
Millennium development goals to sustainable development goals: Journey continues for a better world
Indian Journal of Public Health, 2015
Sustainable development goals (SDGs) are viewed as extension of millennium development goals (MDGs) and a post-2015 agenda to fight against poverty and hunger, while protecting human rights of people and ensuring inclusive and sustainable development and healthy lives. It sounds simple but there are very complex international dynamics involved with evolution of MDGs and then SDGs. This review article examines the sociopolitical evidence base that served as motivation for MDGs to come and later on SDGs. The antecedents to the MDGs include some key summits of the 1990s which fed into many of the goals of MDGs. Then Development Assistance Committee (DAC) of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) came out with international development goals (IDGs). Then Clare Short (a member of the Labour Party) in the UK's Department for International Development (DFID) and Utstein group propelled the IDGs by securing support for them. The UN also came out with a set of development goals to be converted to MDGs. There were interactions between and within the UN and DAC to bring together one set of MDGs. Other big players were IMF and World Bank. There was huge criticism of MDGs for not being holistic as they left out certain social issues. Also there was a need for post-2015 agenda. As a result, SDGs came by the end of 2015. Even they could not escape criticism, and the article discusses few debates around them. At last, the article discusses potential challenges for SDGs, both at international level as well as national level with special emphasis on health-related SDGs.
Five Questions and Answers on the Sustainable Development Goals
2014
❚ The sustainable development goals (SDGs) are an unprecedented attempt to integrate the many dimensions of sustainable development into a single framework of objectives. To the credit of the vice-chairs of the Open Working Group, the drafting of the SDGs was preceded by a number of consultations on the state of problems of unsustainable development and solutions to these problems; they were thus drafted with a view to effectiveness, in other words as goals that can and ought to be achieved, rather than as an asymptote towards which efforts should be directed. ❚ Taken as a whole, the SDGs proposed by the OWG are above all enhanced and extended Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), with the implications that they primarily concern the developing countries and that they do not integrate development and environment issues to any significant degree. ❚ Criticisms and doubts can be expressed regarding certain goals or targets taken in isolation from one another, for which few means of acti...
International Journal of Engineering and Techniques, 2019
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) differ from the MDGs in purpose, concept, and politics. This article focuses process and comparison of the predecessor to the SDGs. The identification of Millennium Development Goals and the follow-on Sustainable Development Goals are referred to here as examples of such policy forming activities. The Millennium Declaration was adopted on 8th September 2000. According to David Hulme, the drafting process attempted to please both the rich countries insisting on their Development Assistance Committee (DAC) prepared list of International Development Goals and everybody else. It argues that the SDGs address several of the key shortcomings of the MDGs and incorporate a broader and more transformative agenda that more adequately reflect the complex challenges of the 21st century and the need for structural reforms in the global economy. The SDGs also reverse the MDG approach to global goal setting and the misplaced belief in the virtues of simplicity, concreteness, and quantification. While the SDGs promise the potential for a more transformative agenda, implementation will depend on continued advocacy on each of the targets to hold authorities to account. The future of global public participation may move beyond invitation (and its deficiencies), to one based on collecting passive information of the global public. It still remains to be seen whether SDGs really demonstrate the longterm public concerns especially with the set of global priorities until 2030.
The Sustainable Development Goals
Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks, 2023
The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) (2000-2015) and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) (2015-30) illustrate that we are one global human family. We are interconnected. Issues of poverty, ill health and natural disasters have an impact directly or indirectly on all the people and nations of the world. Today, the SDGs represent the global development agenda. Governments have the primary responsibility for implementing the SDGs, and ensuring follow-up and review over the coming 8 years, at the national, regional and global levels. However, according to SDG 17, which concerns partnerships, there is also a place for all stakeholders (government, business, academia, civil society and local community) to play a role. This entry, after a brief summary of the global development agenda, explains the relationship between SDGs and the social and solidarity economy (SSE) principles and models to illustrate the compatibility of the two, and showcases the SSE as a community-based strategy for the effective localising of the SDGs.
UN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS
THE UNITED NATIONS AGENDA 2030 OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT WILL FALL INTO THE NATURAL PITFALLS OF “BLUEPRINTS”., 2019
The 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) are aimed at making the world a better place for the present and future generations. Bettering the world for future generations is a noble idea and the UN is taking on a noble task. It is on the "what" to implement and "how" to implement it that put the SDG on the path to failure. Thus I concur with the assertion that the UN Agenda 2030 on sustainable development falls into the natural pitfalls of blueprints. This essay will elaborate on how UN miss it on "what" to implement and how it's method of implementing the SDG will lead to failure. However, successes of SDG's are also interrogated.
A Review Study On sustainable Development Goals: UN 2030 Agenda
Our Heritage, 2020
The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, got by each United Nations Member States in 2015, gave a common framework to amicability and flourishing for people and the planet, by then and into what's to come. At its heart are the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which are a basic call for action by all countries-made and making-in an overall association. This study describes the understanding of all 17 sustainable development goals in detail and observed that fulfillment desperation and various hardships must go inseparable with philosophies that improve prosperity and guidance, decline irregularity, and push financial advancement-all while taking care of natural change and endeavoring to spare our oceans and boondocks. To make the 2030 Agenda a reality, wide responsibility for SDGs must convert into a solid duty by all partners to actualize the worldwide objectives. Regular monitoring and accountability will be essential to sustain policy focus and funding for the broad and complex SGDs agenda.
THE MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS: Evaluating Their Transition Into The SDGs
The MDGs are now in the spotlight since we have reached the year 2015, the target year for achieving these goals. There has been much debate and discussion about these goals since their conception. Hence one half of the discourse focuses on the past, how these goals have improved outcomes in various countries and the world in general while the other half is talking about the path ahead and how to ensure that the momentum gained by the goals is maintained. The result of such discussions have now culminated in the formation of the Sustainable Development Goals. It has been a long, interesting journey since 2000 for the world on the development front because never before have all the countries risen together to tackle development ailments together at this level and intensity. Hence with this background, this paper attempts to talk about the MDGs and provide some constructive criticism of their conception and design. I will also talk about a few cases from India and hence set the stage for improvements in the MDGs that the SDGs are trying to fulfill.
Advancing the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
The Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary International Political Economy
The adoption of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in 2000 has been an achievement by itself. They have been in fact the First World's shared goals, the first global agreement to try to end extreme poverty with its main collateral effects. The United Nations (UN) System has been a critical partner in the entire process: to set the MDGs in place, to provide leadership, policy advice to various sets of actors about the mechanism around which the MDGs have been rolled out. It also provided capacity building, training, finances to governments, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). The MDGs have in fact expired at the end of 2015 and, while their evaluation and critiques are being progressively analysed, the post-2015 development agenda has been prepared. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have been formally adopted in 25-27 September 2015. Even before the deadline approached, it became evident that the MDGs would not have been achieved by anyone and that huge disparities exist
In the Making of a Better World: U N Sustainable Development Goals, 2030
EPRA International Journal of Economic and Business Review, 2020
Sustainable development can be defined as development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. The Brundtland Commission Report 1987 defines Sustainable Development thus "Sustainable Development is the development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs." From the very beginning the United Nations have taken the initiative to make Sustainable Development a reality to protect our planet from degradation and depletion in various forms. The Declaration of the UN Conference on the Human Environment or Stockholm Declaration was adopted on June, 1972 by the UN Conference on the Human Environment at the 21 st plenary meeting as the first document in International Environmental law to recognize the right to a healthy environment. In the declaration, the nations agreed to accept responsibility for any environmental effects caused by their actions. Keeping this in view the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, adopted 27 principles intended to guide future sustainable development around the world in tune with the Stockholm Declaration 1972 on Human Environment. In this paper an attempt would be made to study the various aspects of sustainable development especially reducing inequalities in all forms, including the empowerment of women and girls' and the most marginalized. To focus on balanced and sustainable economic growth with employment creation which is fundamental for addressing the multidimensional nature of poverty and which must be decoupled from environmental degradation.