Labor Productivity and Foreign Direct Investment in the Indonesian Manufacturing Sector (original) (raw)

The Effect of Spillover Foreign Direct Investment on Labor Productivity in Indonesia

Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan: Kajian Masalah Ekonomi dan Pembangunan, 2022

The contribution of the manufacturing sector to Indonesia's GDP reaches more than 20 percent. However, Indonesia has challenges to increase the productivity of workers who work in the industrial sector. The Omnibus law requires the assistance of foreign workers to work in Indonesia so that technology and expertise transfer happen. Foreign workers are believed to have a spillover effect in the form of skills and technology transfer through Foreign Direct Investment (FDI). FDI in the manufacturing sector allows an increase in labor productivity as a result of the spillover effect in the form of the transfer of skills and technology. This study aims to examine the impact of FDI spillover by making a comparison between labor productivity in companies whose ownership is dominated by foreign and domestic. Using data used from a large medium industry survey in 2010-2014. The method used in this research is panel data regression analysis with a cross-section of 28 industry subcategories derived from ISIC and a 5-year time series from 2010-2014, when the manufacturing sector became a source of growth in Indonesia of more than one percent. The results are in general FDI has a positive effect on labor productivity in companies whose ownership is dominated by foreign and domestic ownership. Meanwhile, FDI spillovers on labor productivity did not occur in companies whose ownership was dominated by domestic but occurred in companies whose ownership was dominated by foreigners.

The Effect of FDI on Indonesia’s Jobs, Wages, and Structural Transformation

2020

Foreign direct investment (FDI) can provide important opportunities for middle-class jobs by stimulating employment growth, paying wage premiums and helping to shift workers out of less productive sectors. This analysis exploits regional variations in sales to examine the effect that multinational corporations (MNCs) in the manufacturing sector have on employment and wages in Indonesia between 2007 and 2015. Using interaction effects, it explores how these effects differ by workers' education level, occupation and employment status. The study finds that manufacturing MNCs raise average wages in their sector. Yet, higher-educated workers benefit more, and white-collar workers see greater benefits than blue-collar workers. Women also appear to benefit more than men, as a result of the type of laborintensive sectors MNCs engage in. The study finds evidence that manufacturing FDI can help to accelerate structural transformation, as workers move out of lower-productivity sectors (agriculture and low-skilled services) and into higher-productivity manufacturing.

Which firms benefit from foreign direct investment? Empirical evidence from Indonesian manufacturing

Despite growing concern regarding the productivity benefits of foreign direct investment (FDI), very few studies have been conducted on the impact of FDI on firm-level technical efficiency. This study helps fill this gap by empirically examining the spillover effects of FDI on the technical efficiency of Indonesian manufacturing firms. A panel data stochastic production frontier (SPF) method is applied to 3318 firms surveyed over the period 1988– 2000. The results reveal evidence of positive FDI spillovers on technical efficiency. Interesting differences emerge however when the samples are divided into two efficiency levels. High-efficiency domestic firms receive negative spillovers, in general, while lowefficiency firms gain positive spillovers. These findings justify the hypothesis of efficiency gaps, that the larger is the efficiency gap between domestic and foreign firms the easier the former extracts spillover benefits from the latter.

Foreign Direct Investment And Regional Economic Growth In Indonesia: A Panel Data Study

2003

There have been extensive studies on the effects of foreign direct investment (FDI) on economic growth, either at the firm level or at national level. The researchs in this area have been extensified during this last decade due to the increased role of FDI in total capital flows. The direction of the flow is from the North (developed countries) to the South (developing countries). In 1999, FDI accounted for more than half of all private capital flows to developing countries. 1 The main argument in favor of FDI is the belief that FDI has several positive effects which include productivity gains, technology transfers, the introduction of new processes, managerial skills, and know-how in the domestic market, employee training, international production networks, and access to markets. 2 For developing countries, FDI is also viewed as an attractive alternative to long-term bank loans as a form of capital inflow. The opposing arguments, for example , states that FDI has a detrimental effect on the process of development of developing countries and leads to uneven global development.

Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from Provincial Level Data in Indonesia

Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 2021

Foreign direct investment (FDI) is especially important for developing countries. This study investigates the determinants of FDI in the case of Indonesia. Most empirical researches in this field used time series data of a single country or panel data of several countries. Although panel data analysis is more comprehensive, however results taken from crosscountry analysis cannot be directly applied to any specific country in the dataset and therefore lacks practicality. In this research, panel data analysis of a single country is performed to overcome the aforementioned shortcomings. Five determinants of FDI are tested using panel data of 33 Indonesian provinces over 10-year period of time. Two methodologies are adopted, random/fixed effects model and Granger Causality. The results show that only market size significantly affects FDI when tested using both methodologies. Human capital and financial market development show significant result in one of the two methodologies. While, economic growth and infrastructure did not show any significant results at all. This research stresses the importance of comprehensive single country analysis since only one out of five commonly discussed determinants is applicable in the case of Indonesia. Governments should therefore carefully reconsider the use of crosscountry analysis as a basis of their policy formulations.

Analysis the Relationship between Direct Investment and Labor

Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies

The establishment of the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) makes the movement of labor in the ASEAN region more free and dynamic. This provides wider opportunities for Indonesian workers to get better jobs. On the other hand, the same opportunity is also owned by citizens of other ASEAN countries to enter the labor market in Indonesia. Based on several previous empirical studies, the entry of foreign workers into a country can significantly impact economic growth, both positively and negatively. The impact is greatly influenced by the skill level of a worker. High skilled labor tends to have a positive impact on economic growth. The increase in the number of foreign workers is also influenced by FDI and GDP. The amount of FDI received by a country tends to be positively correlated with the number of foreign workers. This is because the FDI provided has applied high technology so that the knowledge transfer process is needed by foreign experts. The tendency of foreign skilled workers wh...

Sources of Productivity Gains from Fdi in Indonesia: Is It Efficiency Improvement or Technological Progress?

The Developing Economies, 2010

Scope The Developing Economies is the o cial journal of the Institute of Developing Economies, JETRO, and publishes original research articles dealing with empirical and comparative studies on social sciences relating to the developing countries. (source) Enter Journal Title, ISSN or Publisher Name Quartiles The set of journals have been ranked according to their SJR and divided into four equal groups, four quartiles. Q1 (green) comprises the quarter of the journals with the highest values, Q2 (yellow) the second highest values, Q3 (orange) the third highest values and Q4 (red) the lowest values. Category Year Quartile Development 1997 Q3 Development 1998 Q3 Development 1999 Q3 Development 2000 Q2 SJR The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It is based on the idea that 'all citations are not created equal'. SJR is a measure of scienti c in uence of journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from It measures the scienti c in uence of the average article

Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from Sectoral Data in Indonesia

The paper investigates the impact of foreign direct investment (FDI) on economic growth using detailed sectoral data for FDI inflows to Indonesia over the period 1997-2006. In the aggregate level, FDI is observed to have a positive effect on economic growth. However, when accounting for the different average growth performance across sectors, the beneficial impact of FDI is no longer apparent. When examining different impacts across sectors, estimation results show that the composition of FDI matters for its effect on economic growth with very few sectors showing positive impact of FDI and one sector even showing a robust negative impact of FDI inflows (mining and quarrying). The sectors examined are: farm food crops, livestock product, forestry, fishery, mining and quarrying, non-oil and gas industry, electricity, gas and water, construction, retail and wholesale trade, hotels and restaurant, transport and communications, and other private and services sectors.

CONTRIBUTION OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT (FDI) TO INDONESIA'S ECONOMIC GROWTH FOR THE PERIOD 2015-2020

Rere kesya, 2023

The purpose of this article is to assess the impact of foreign direct investment (FDI) from four countries that are Indonesia's main trade partners: Japan, China, Singapore, and the United States, on the Indonesian economy. The dependent variable in this research is Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and the independent variable is FDI from four countries. This research uses a multiple linear regression method to analyze the data. The findings of the research indicate that Indonesia's GDP is positively and significantly influenced by foreign direct investment from these four countries, with a coefficient of determination (R^2) of 0.987. This shows that FDI makes a very high contribution to the Indonesian economy. This research recommends that the Indonesian government continue to improve an attractive and competitive investment climate in order to attract more FDI from various countries.