'Accounting for Taste' - The Case for Creative Writing's Inclusion within High-Stakes Assessment (original) (raw)
Related papers
Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in the South, 2023
This article considers assessment practices within the neoliberal conditions of higher education by posing questions to conceptions of value. As a motivating thrust, this article asks: might there be generative potential that remains unexplored, due to assessment’s direct linkage to the production of human capital? With its central emphasis on value, this article turns towards Brian Massumi’s Postcapitalist Manifesto: 99 Theses on the Revaluation of Value (2018). Guided by Massumi, I compose speculative propositions with which to explore the potential for a postcapitalist reworking of value within the context of assessment. The propositions offered in this paper by no means exhaust the emergent potential of re-thinking assessment, yet my aim is to sow but a few generative seeds that might expand on the potential of what (else) assessment might do. In engaging assessment otherwise, this article foregrounds assessment practices that are pertinent to the creative arts (with particular interest in the pedagogical convention of the studio crit), not as a means to suggest that arts-based disciplines have a superior and well-resolved approach to assessment, but rather to leverage the already tenuous relationship between arts education and assessment. As its objectives, this article aims to (1) contribute to the underrepresented discourse on the assessment of creative arts in higher education and to (2) explore the potential for re-imaginings of arts-based assessment practices to leak into the wider discourse of assessment as a whole. The intention is not to deliver fully-formed methodological formulae but to think through assessment with propositions that might be expanded upon through speculative experimentation and future inquiries.
The Function of Critical Theory in Tertiary Creative Writing Programmes
Southern Review, 1997
As the product of a Creative Writing class is not literary criticism but a 'literary work,' writing programmes are usually seen to operate independently of, or outside the parameters of, literary theory. This paper avoids the governing assumption that writing as a social practice and individual expression existing first and foremost in the public sphere has been imported into the academy via the discipline of Creative Writing. Instead it looks at how Creative Writing occupies a space within literature and literary theory and how the 'writer' has been fashioned in this space in relation to the intellectual-as-critic.
Transgeneric Assessment: Modernist Affordances for the Student Essay
Critical Arts, 2023
The essay is one mode of expression, a discursive genre among many. But given its monolithic status as assessment tool in the humanities, this relativity is sometimes overlooked. Such modal inflexibility is still more puzzling given that syllabus changes have recently been driven by inclusivity and varieties of learning experience. Opening onto this variety, the present article asks whether students' critical thinking could be strengthened by their imaginative capacity, and how modal shifts in assessment practice can expand academic meaning-making. Specifically, it weighs the benefits, risks and responsibilities of translating or "regenring" the academic essay into alternative forms. Underpinned by recent theories of assessment practice, the article also situates "regenring" in relation to the disruptive, digressive, even errant formal energies of modernist literature.
Judging, Inevitably: Aesthetic Judgment and Novelistic Form
Henry Fielding's Joseph Andrews is often thought to have inaugurated a tradition of sociological observation in the novel, and it also cultivates a practice of judgment in readers. Yet the social theory that informs Fielding's novel (Thomas Hobbes, Bernard Mandeville) is dominated by a sense of inevitability, whereas judgment concerns the things that can be otherwise. A close reading of Joseph Andrews shows that Fielding does not deploy uncritically the methods and assumptions of a nascent social theory. Rather, he teaches us that those methods and assumptions hold only for the advent of a commercial modernity that renders judgment all but obsolete. Refusing the sentimental (Richardsonian) and aesthetic (Shaftes-burian) responses to this social theory as also complicit in the elision of judgment, Fielding works to transform the emerging novel into a narrative and aesthetic form capable of restoring our capacity for judgment.
Many screen-based production assignments in academia are assessed solely by examining the completed work. This assessment model for creative work exposes itself to accusations of subjectivity, and can be regarded as lacking academic rigour. By looking at some historical precedents in literature and painting criticism, this paper contributes to discussion of whether result-based assessment is appropriate to creative practice in education. If assessment is regarded as a measure of whether learning has taken place, relative to the content of curricula, then closer scrutiny of the process towards completion of creative work may be more apt. This paper proposes that assessment of how a work is developed is an essential aid in judging how creative skills have been learnt, matured and utilised. The paper also acknowledges the challenge of assessing innovation and experimentation, in the context of conventional standards and criteria, and contrary to expectation, finds some inspiration for meeting this challenge in the sciences.