This is my lesson': Ethnomethodological lessons in classroom order and social organisation for adults with learning difficulties (original) (raw)
Related papers
Transcending the zone of learning disability: learning in contexts for everyday life
European Journal of Special Needs Education, 2008
The purpose of this paper is to illustrate a sociocultural approach to studying disability in educational contexts grounded in the cultural‐historical and activity theory approaches. From the sociocultural viewpoint, disability is regarded as being located in particular types of activity systems and learning cultures rather than within an individual. This helps to explain why children who demonstrate disability in one situation may be competent in other contexts. The paper offers a sociocultural analysis based on a case study of a transition made by a teacher and a student from a traditional pedagogical approach of covering a curriculum aimed at teaching money maths to a new system based on the concept of a community of learners. We combined a qualitative field study approach supported by ecological and ethnographic perspectives with micro‐ethnographic discourse analysis and an action research perspective. We show how the special education teacher, with the help of the researcher, began to transform the set of classroom activities, moving from a traditional pedagogical context to that of a community of learners. The analysis focuses on this process, presenting the specific cases that occurred in the special class and involving Maria's conversations with her special education teacher about useful tasks for her everyday life. This experience permitted us to examine how the transformation of the learning scenario enables changes in ways of learning to appear, in the participation of the learner in her own learning process and the relationship between teacher and student.
In the first chapter of this volume, Wyatt-Smith and Elkins argue that ‘it is timely to review how different theoretical frameworks and methodologies provide different lenses through which to study students’ learning needs’. By viewing different theoretical frameworks and methodologies as potentially complementary, Wyatt-Smith, Elkins and other authors in this volume move discussions beyond debates of which method is best, to a discussion of what different theoretical traditions contribute towards research on students’ learning needs. In this chapter, we seek to contribute towards this argument by demonstrating how multiple theoretical perspectives and methods can be included in a single research study as well as in programs of research that seek to explore common phenomena from different theoretical and methodological points of view (for example Green & Harker, 1988; Grimshaw, Burke, & Cicourel, 1994; Koschmann, 1999; Cumming & Wyatt-Smith, 2001a)
The school experiences of a learning disabled students
2012
Within the disciplines of disability studies and childhood studies there has been increasing interest in disabled students’ experiences of school. This thesis builds on that work by drawing on: sociocultural theory, in particular the framework of communities of practice; the social model of disability; and the sociology of childhood. Using an ethnographic case study methodology, informed by sociocultural theory, this thesis explores the experiences, and therefore classroom engagement, of one male learning disabled student as he moves through Years 7-9 within the ‘mainstream’ New Zealand school system. The aim is to understand the contribution of disability and impairment to this student’s schooling experiences. Sociocultural theory was used to develop substantive theories and then they were refined using the constant comparative method. The analysis focuses on three significant areas of explanation for the student’s experiences: the interaction of impairment and disability, embodied within the curricular environment; the learning environment that was being provided for all students; and lastly, his peer interactions and relationships with adults. Understanding how each of these areas of experience interacts together within the student’s engagement in the classroom as a community of practice affords significant insights. First, the place of impairment and disability within the student’s experiences is understood as being ‘called forth’ by the context at the same time that impairment/disability is contributing to, but not dominating, the student’s identity as a learner. Secondly, the student’s development as a reader and writer is strongly influenced by the complex social and cultural processes that make up ‘literacy’ in the classroom. Finally, analysis suggests that classroom practices, inclusive of curriculum and literacy, are relational. They are sustained and held in place by peers and adults, both within and external to the classroom. By using the dispositional elements of ready, willing and able to understand the learner’s engagement, there is much to be gained by analysing the context with respect to: What overall learning messages are promoted at school? What opportunities are offered during the day to engage the student in learning? How are skills scaffolded to increase the sophistication of participation? This broader framework provides a means for understanding the construction and embodiment of impairment and disability. The case study student found his disability/impairment was emphasized in a school context that valued the social enterprise of reading and writing. The student had a strong inclination to participate in the regular literacy classroom practices like all other students. With support, mainly in the form of Teacher Aides, he was able to engage in literacy activities, despite the level of frustration and tiredness (impairment effects) it generated. Over the three years of observation, the student was observed to have quite different friendship experiences, which seemed to be a reflection of the different peer groups that made up his classes. One outcome of analysis is a framework for understanding and evaluating engagement and inclusion in the classroom. The thesis concludes by discussing the implications of the findings in relation to understanding disability, childhood, sociocultural theory and classroom practice. It highlights that asking questions about knowing why, where and when, and how is more important than the current New Zealand special education policy that focuses on resourcing. A similar criticism is leveled at the current assessment policy (National Standards) that narrows competence to ability, without recognizing contribution and citizenship.
1988
Family Background, Early Childhood and Public School Experiences Postsecondary Education and Early Adult Experiences Vocational Training and Career Experiences Family Relationships Physical Condition and Health viii Interview Contact Period: Experiences and Comments Termination of Research CHAPTER V-DISCUSSION AN0 COWCLUSiOlYS Data Analysis in Educational Ethnography Questions of Truth, Lies and Reality Themes Meaning Conclusions CHAPTER V-RECOHWENDATI_ONS BIBLIOGRAPHY APPENDIX A-A Prisufier in Ely Own Rod' APPENDIX B-Cindy's Academic Documents and Assessments APPEND1 X C-Cindy's Personal Writings The initial idea I had f o r a t i t l e f o r this work was A Day rir h e 7 : a Case Sfudy o f. .. ; but then the realization struck t h a t it was really, f o r the reader, d Life in s Day of studying it. Then, even more strongly, struck the elemental irony: this has not been a l i f e lived i n the brightness
International Perspectives on Teaching with Disability, 2019
This chapter provides the author's own learning disabilities (LD) experiences as faculty director.It examines andragogy as the framework that helps the author to better ensure all of his students have opportunities to learn, regardless of who they are as learners. The chapter then presents anexploration of how and why the author applies the basic assumptions of andragogy to teaching his students to become peer educators at the oral communication center. It also addresses the role of disabilities in the interplay between the author and his students. The lens of Speaking Center(SC) citizenship became increasingly important for the author as the director in 2007, when the center moved from a space that had already outgrown into a smaller space in a newly constructed building. Andragogy's roots are in Germany and other European countries. In 1927 it was first introduced in the United States by Martha Anderson and Edward Linderman (Davenport &Davenport, 1985)
Society, Health & Vulnerability
Students with severe and multiple disabilities are, according to official Norwegian policies, to be included in ordinary school settings. Yet usually their schooldays are organized differently from those of their non-disabled peers. In this paper the authors aim (1) to identify how embodied meaning unfolds when students with severe and multiple disabilities are fastened in assistive technical devices and (2) to identify how staff respond when students make gestures. Applying the phenomenological philosophy and the phenomenological methodology the authors acknowledge movement as fundamental for the students' possibilities to express their perspective. Their empirical material describes how possibilities for making gestures are severely limited when students are fastened in devices. To shed light on the staff's recognition and response as fundamental for interactions when students are under embodied constraint, they have applied Goffman's interactionism.