Effects of Higher Equity Ratio on a Bank's Total Funding Costs and Lending (original) (raw)
Related papers
Bank Capital and the Cost of Equity
SSRN Electronic Journal
Using a sample of publicly listed banks from 62 countries over the 1991-2017 period, we investigate the impact of capital on banks' cost of equity. Consistent with the theoretical prediction that more equity in the capital mix leads to a fall in firms' costs of equity, we find that better capitalized banks enjoy lower equity costs. Our baseline estimations indicate that a 1 percentage point increase in a bank's equity-to-assets ratio lowers its cost of equity by about 18 basis points. Our results also suggest that the form of capital that investors value the most is sheer equity capital; other forms of capital, such as Tier 2 regulatory capital, are less (or not at all) valued by investors. Additionally, our main finding that capital has a negative effect on banks' cost of equity holds in both developed and developing countries. The results of this paper provide the missing evidence in the debate on the effects of higher capital requirements on banks' funding costs.
Impact of Bank Equity Capital on Bank Cost of Capital ∗
2017
Using a sample of 178 publicly traded Bank Holding Companies (BHCs) between 1994 and 2014, this paper provides evidence on the relation between a bank’s equity capital ratio and the cost of capital. To address endogeneity between a bank’s equity capital ratio and risk of balance sheet assets, we use an instrumental variable approach, as well as a triple differences approach. We find a 10 percentage point increase in the book equity capital ratio is associated with a 92 basis points increase in the bank’s cost of capital. We also find that a 10 percentage point increase in the market equity capital ratio is associated with a 59 basis points increase in the bank’s cost of capital. Restricting the analysis to large banks with book assets in excess of $50 billion, we find that a 10 percentage point increase in the book equity capital ratio is associated with a 23 basis points increase in the bank’s cost of capital. Even though an increase in the equity capital ratio is associated with a...
Value at Risk, Bank Equity and Credit Risk
Risk Management
We study the implications of the value at risk concept for the bank's optimum amount of equity capital under credit risk. The market value of loans is risky and lognormally distributed. We show that the required equity capital depends upon managerial and market factors. Furthermore, the bank's equity and asset/liability management has to be addressed simultaneously by bank managers.
Measuring the Cost of Equity of Euro Area Banks
Social Science Research Network, 2021
Disclaimer: This paper should not be reported as representing the views of the European Central Bank (ECB). The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the ECB.
Estimating the Cost of Equity Capital of the Banking Sector in the Eurozone
Journal of Applied Finance and Banking, 2015
The objectives of this paper are, first, to estimate the long-run cost of equity capital for the banking sector using data from the Eurozone, US, UK, Sweden and Switzerland for the period 1999-2014. Our inference differs from that of previous studies because we employ a dynamic panel GMM model with a fixed effect and a multi-factor asset pricing framework to explain the variation of the cost of equity capital across banks in terms of risk-factors including, bank size, leverage, business cycle and regulations. Second, this model analyzes whether the cost of equity of banks in Eurozone differs from banks’ cost of equity in the U.S. Our findings show that the multi-factor asset pricing framework does provide a robust explanation of the cost of equity for banking sector. Our findings are consistent with those of IIF (2011) in that a higher leverage ratio, an increase in capital requirement and regulation resulting in an increase of the cost of equity in the banking sector. However, th...
International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 2016
This paper studies the cost of equity and capital of three Bulgarian listed banks in the framework of the Modigliani-Miller (MM) theory of capital structure. It measures the impact of an increase in capital ratios on the equity risk (equity beta) of these banks. It finds that, historically, while more equity results in lower banks' systematic risk no causal relationship can be found between an increase in capital ratios and the predicted by the theory decrease in banks' systematic risk. MM irrelevance argument holds that a decrease in equity risk will lead to a decrease in the shareholders' required (and expected) return on equity and thus offsetting the higher equity (capital) level. Thus, the results cannot find evidence in support of the so-called "Modigliani-Miller" offset.
Bank Level and Country Level Determinants of Bank Capital Structure and Funding Sources
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2015
Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policy While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive.
Different Methods to Estimating the Cost of Equity: An Analysis on a Sample of Too Big to Fail Banks
In this study, a comparison was made between the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), the most widely used methodology, and an actuarial method with the use of credit default swaps (CDSs) and the method based on the inverse of the multiple P/E. These three models are used to estimate the cost of equity. The comparison was made on a sample of 24 banks selected among the largest for assets in the world (too big to fail banks) belonging to 11 different countries. The results show that the CAPM estimates a premium for the higher risk than the one obtained with the actuarial method and the method based on the inverse of the P/E (except for 2013).
In good times and in bad: Bank capital ratios and lending rates
a r t i c l e i n f o Available online xxxx JEL classification: G01 G18 G28 G32 G38 This paper investigates the relationship between bank capital ratios and lending rates using data from 1998 to 2012 for 13 large banks accounting for 75% of total UK lending. We document a substantial change in the coefficient of the Tier 1 capital ratio in reduced-form regressions for secured household lending rates; the coefficient changes from positive pre-crisis to negative in crisis. Significant changes are also detected in the relationship for unsecured household and corporate lending. Such instability is difficult to reconcile with many well-established theories of financial intermediation but is consistent with the relatively recent theories of bank portfolio decisions emphasising cyclical variation in bank leverage and risk-appetite.