The Lucerne Design Management Process: Outline Of The Principal Process Used In The Bachelor Programme Design Management, International (original) (raw)
Related papers
Abstract: This paper sets out to clarify the relationship between the ‘research process’ and the ‘design process’ in the context of research in postgraduate Arts & Design education. The relationship between these processes is not well understood, and this is further complicated by terms such as ‘research design’ and ‘design thinking’ when applied to planning research activities, including selecting the qualitative and quantitative methods employed as well as applying systems design techniques. In addition, ‘practice-based research’ is still controversial in terms of academic rigour, and in some arts and design schools may lead, unintentionally, to the design process (with, say, only a novel product as the outcome) being interpreted as a research process of sufficient academic depth and originality for a PhD. However, as will be explained, the two processes are not necessarily the same although there are valuable analogous functions which enhance the research outcomes when applied sensibly. This paper will use process modelling tools, diagrams and actual case studies from PhD projects to show how the research and design processes are interrelated leading to better informed research experiences and outcomes for students and supervisors. Biographies: 1. Dr. Elivio Bonollo – Emeritus Professor, Industrial Design University of Canberra Dr. Elivio Bonollo PhD (Melb) is emeritus professor of industrial design, in the Faculty of Arts and Design, at the University of Canberra (UC). He was foundation professor of industrial design at UC (1997-2002) and a Pro Vice-Chancellor (1999-2001): earlier he was Dean of the Faculty of Environmental Design (1997-98). Elivio (Livio) was professor and director of the Centre for Industrial Design at Monash University (1989-96) and before this senior lecturer in charge of industrial design in the Faculty of Art at RMIT (1979-89). He is the founder of the industrial design discipline at Monash University and the principal author of the original industrial design degrees at RMIT (1982) and Monash University (1989). He is a PhD supervisor and currently a member of the Space, Place and Object Research Cluster. 2. Dr. Carlos Alberto Montana-Hoyos, Associate Professor, Industrial Design University of Canberra Dr. Carlos Montana-Hoyos was born in Bogotá, Colombia. He graduated cum laude from an MAID and a PhD from Kobe Design University (Japan Scholarship). As a designer, Carlos has developed multidisciplinary projects related to concept, product, graphics, exhibition and urban design. Several of his projects have received diverse international design awards. As an academic, Carlos was an Adjunct Assistant Professor in the Product Design Engineering course of EAFIT University in his country (2001-03). He was also a Fellow and Assistant Professor (2006-10) in the ID Program of the National University of Singapore. He is currently an Associate Professor in the ID course of the Faculty of Arts and Design, University of Canberra. His main research is in Biomimicry and Design for Sustainability, and he recently published a book on these topics.
The International Journal of Design Management and Professional Practice
The international journal of design management and professional practice, 2016
Within the last three decades, we have witnessed development of many theories on design approaches that render the process more solid and, thus, practiced by non-designer professionals. What is common for all of the design processes is that there is a moment of translation of research insights into design recommendations, and this point, however, has never been very explicit and it is rather seen as a fuzzy edge between switching between two activities. Within this article, we focus on this fuzzy edge reasoning to the extent this point can be demystified and explicit, or when it should remain fuzzy, reflecting on creativity and importance of engaging design professionals within the process. The discussion is based on a case study of students' works from the UX Design course taught by the authors, where we refer to design tools as tangible concrete support that renders the design process more solid.
Design Research Now: Essays and Selected Projects
If international design research is to continue to develop, we need to have fundamental discussions, not only on what we understand design research to be, but also on the most important questions and issues, on exemplary design projects, and on the most promising subject areas now and in the future. Rather than asserting unilaterally that a particular conception of research is the only valid one, or that a single type of approach is exemplary, however, our aim should be to present a diversity of viewpoints and research projects to a wider audience of design researchers, introducing specific research areas and giving reference points for more extensive debate on the focus, issues, objectives, approaches and methods of design research.
Studies have recognized the failure of the traditional design approach both in practice and in the studio. They showed that design problems today are too complex for the traditional approach to cope with and reflected a new interest in a better quality design services in order to meet the challenges of our time. In the mid-1970s and early 1980s, there has been a significant shift in focus within the field of design research towards the aim of creating a 'design discipline'. The problem, as will be discussed, is the lack of an integrated theory of design knowledge that can explicitly describe the design process in a coherent way. As a consequence, the traditional approach fails to operate systematically, in a disciplinary manner. Addressing this problem is the primary goal of the research study in the design process currently being conducted in the research-based master studio at Wollega University, Ethiopia. The research study seeks to make a contribution towards a disciplinary approach, through proper understanding the mechanism of knowledge development within design process systems. This is the task of the 'theory of design knowledge'. In this article the research project is introduced, and a model of the design process-system is developed in the studio as a research plan and a tool of design research at the same time. Based on data drawn from students' research projects, the theory of design knowledge is developed and empirically verified through the research project. 1. Introduction Studies have recognized the failure of the traditional design approach both in practice and in the studio. They showed that design problems today are too complex for the traditional approach to cope with [1], they criticized the traditional approach for lacking objective knowledge [2] and expressed a new interest in a better quality design [3]. In the mid-1970s and early 1980s, there has been a significant shift in focus within the field of design research towards the aim of creating a 'design discipline', [4]. Although design is usually a result of integrated thinking, described as systems approach integrated response [5]. There is no design theory at present exists, as will be discussed latter, that can explicitly describe the mechanism of knowledge development and integration within the design process, which the study refers to by the term the 'design knowledge mechanism'. As a result, the traditional approach fails to operate systematically, in a disciplinary manner. Addressing this is the central issue in the research study in the design process, which is currently being conducted in the research-based master studio at Wollega University, Ethiopia. The study seeks to make a contribution towards a disciplinary approach, through proper understanding the design knowledge mechanism, within design process systems. This is the task of the 'theory of design knowledge'. In this article a model of the 'design process-system' is developed in the studio as a methodology of design and as a tool for design research. The idea is not to impose a specific
The Dual Nature of Design Management
26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 2018
Design management profession has probably got the least attention in the construction industry. One reason could be the lack of explicit conceptualizations about its nature, subject matter and principles. In this article, a conceptual design management framework is proposed on the premise that design management is the management of a structured system of object and subject-oriented, technical and social design activities. Additionally, an example of a mediating visual model is proposed to facilitate the discussions about design activities and design management in academia and practice. The two major premises of this research are 1) as design management is the management of design activity, it is dependent on the way design is conceptualized; and 2) design is a human activity, but not a thing (e.g., representation) or an event (e.g., decision-making).