Influence of Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Genotype on the Clinical Course of Disease in Patients Coinfected with HBV and Hepatitis Delta Virus (original) (raw)
Related papers
Hepatology, 1985
The presence of hepatitis B virus DNA in serum was determined in 57 unselected patients during the course from acute to chronic hepatitis B infection. Forty-six (81%) patients were hepatitis B virus DNA-positive in the first available serum sample. Generally, hepatitis B virus DNA was cleared before or at the same time as HBeAg, but in two patients (4%), hepatitis B virus DNA could be demonstrated after HBeAg clearance. One of the latter patients had hepatitis B virus DNA in the presence of anti-HBe. Both patients became hepatitis B virus DNA-negative. Seven of the hepatitis B virus DNA-positive patients received long-term treatment with prednisone, and three of them continued to be hepatitis B virus DNA positive for more than 10 years. Among the untreated patients hepatitis B virus DNA could be detected for up to 7 years, and 10 patients were hepatitis B virus DNA-positive for three years or more.
Objective: To assess the histological and serological parameters of patients with hepatitis delta virus (HDV) in active HBV versus inactive HBV carriers. Study Design: An observational study. Place and Duration of Study: Medical Unit IV at Liaquat University Hospital, Jamshoro, Sindh, from June 2008 to September 2011. Methodology: This study included 49 consecutive inactive HBV carriers who were HBsAg-positive, HBV DNA-negative, anti-D antibody-positive, and HDV RNA-positive, as well as 277 patients with active HBV who were HBsAg-positive, anti- HDV antibody-positive, HDV RNA-positive, and demonstrated > 20,000 IU/mL HBV DNA and > 2 (ULN) serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT). Informed consent was obtained from each patient. Liver biopsies were obtained and the staging of fibrosis was performed according to the METAVIR scoring system. Continuous variables such as age, SGPT, platelet count, and the HBV DNA level were computed as the mean ± standard deviation. Categorical v...
Characterization of hepatitis B and delta coinfection in Israel
BMC Infectious Diseases, 2018
Background: Characteristics of hepatitis B (HBV) and delta (HDV) coinfection in various geographical regions, including Israel, remain unclear. Here we studied HDV seroprevalence in Israel, assessed HDV/HBV viral loads, circulating genotypes and hepatitis delta antigen (HDAg) conservation. Methods: Serological anti HDV IgG results from 8969 HBsAg positive individuals tested in 2010-2015 were retrospectively analyzed to determine HDV seroprevalence. In a cohort of HBV/HDV coinfected (n=58) and HBV monoinfected (n=27) patients, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and sequencing were performed to determine viral loads, genotypes and hepatitis delta antigen (HDAg) protein sequence. Results: 6.5% (587/8969) of the HBsAg positive patients were positive for anti HDV antibodies. HDV viral load was >2 log copies/ml higher than HBV viral load in most of the coinfected patients with detectable HDV RNA (86%, 50/ 58). HDV genotype 1 was identified in all patients, most of whom did not express HBV. While 66.6% (4/6) of the HBV/HDV co-expressing patients carried HBV-D2 only 18.5% (5/27) of the HBV monoinfections had HBV-D2 (p=0.03). Higher genetic variability in the HDAg protein sequence was associated with higher HDV viral load. Conclusions: The overall significant prevalence of HDV (6.5%) mandates HDV RNA testing for all coinfected patients. Patients positive for HDV RNA (characterized by low HBV DNA blood levels) carried HDV genotype 1. Taken together, the significant HDV seroprevalence and the lack of effective anti-HDV therapy, necessitates strict clinical surveillance especially in patients with higher HDV viral loads and increased viral evolution.
2005
Background: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype and its role in disease progression and patients' response to antiviral treatment, is not well studied in Pakistan. This comprehensive study was aimed to determine the distribution of HBV genotypes in Pakistan and their possible association with phases of HBV infection. Methods: A total of 840 HBsAg positive samples was collected and tested for HBV DNA quantity. Samples below 100 IU/ml were excluded from the study. A total of 715 samples representing all the six parts of the country were genotyped by type specific primer PCR method. Clinical data of only 384 patients was compared as the remaining 332 were either receiving antiviral treatment or their infection phase was not confirmed. Results: Genotype D was found in 509 samples (71.2 %), genotype A in 55 samples (7.7 %) and mixed infection with genotypes A and D in 124 samples (17.3 %). Genotypes B, C and E were identified in less than 1 % of the total samples. Genotype A, D and their mixture (A + D) were compared for severity of HBV infection. Significant differences were not found in distribution of HBV genotypes among different disease stages. Conclusion: HBV genotype D was the predominant infection in all study areas of Pakistan followed by mixed genotypes infection (A + D) whereas genotype A has 10 times lower prevalence than genotype D. Genotypes B, C, E and F altogether make only 1.5 % of the prevalence. Genotype do not appears to show the severity of liver disease.
Journal of Medical Virology, 2015
Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) usually have an unfavorable clinical outcome in chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) patients. In Egypt, data about epidemiology, the spectrum of disease, and impact of HDV on HBV infection are rare. To assess the prevalence, clinical and virological characteristics of HDV infection among Egyptian patients with chronic HBV. Adult patients with Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive were evaluated for the presence of HDV using anti HDV-IgG and HDV RNA by RT-PCR. Routine laboratory investigations, genotypes and subtypes for both HBV and HDV, abdominal sonography, and transient elastography (TE) were done. Liver biopsy was performed only in whenever indicated. One hundred and twenty-one treatment-na€ ıve chronic HBV patients were included. Wild HBV genotype-D2 was found in 98.2% and 81.9% were HBeAg negative. Prevalence of HDV was 8.3% by anti-HDV IgG and 9.9% by RT-PCR. Wild HDV genotype-IIb was reported in 83.3%. HDV infection was more common in males, 90.9% of delta patients were HBeAg negative. Compared to the mono-infected HBV, concomitant HBV/HDV infection was not associated with more derangment in ALT nor advanced stage of fibrosis. 66.7% of HDV patients had significantly lower HBV-DNA level compared to the non-delta patients (P < 0.001). HDV is not uncommon in Egypt. HBV genotype-D was associated with HDV genotype-IIb. Delta infection was associated with negative HBeAg status, reduction of HBV replication, but neither influenced the clinical course nor increased significant liver damage risk.
Hepatology, 1987
This work was supported in part by a grant from the Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias de la Seguridad Social (86/1191), Ministerio de Educacidn y Ciencia, Spain. Addrees reprint requests to: J. Ceneeca, M.D., Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital General Val1 d'Hebron, Paseo Val1 d'Hebron s/n, Barcelona 08035, Spain. 16. Genesca J, Jardi R, Prat S, et al. Valor de la determinacion serica del DNA del virus de La hepatitis B como marcador de replicacion virica. Med Clin 1986,87:665-668. 17. Caredda F, Rossi E, Monforte AA, et al. Hepatitis B virus-associated coinfection and superinfection with delta agent: indistinguishable disease with different outcome. J Infect Dis 1985, 151:925-928. 18. Amoroso P, Giorgio A, Fico P, et al. Delta infection in the Naples area. Epidemiologic and clinical significance. J Hepatoll986 311-18.
Medical & clinical research, 2023
Delta virus predominates and potentially predicts liver cirrhosis among co-infected hepatitis b and hepatitis d virus patients in pakistan Abstract Background: High prevalence of Hepatitis Delta virus (HDV) has been reported from some pockets in Pakistan. Typically, Hepatitis B (HBV) and HDV co-infection could cause severe hepatitis leading to cirrhosis at an early age. We aim to study the clinical outcomes of HBV/HDV co-infection compared to HBV mono-infection in a Punjabi, Pakistani population. Methods: The retrospective data on all HBV positive patients was extracted from Hepatitis Prevention and Treatment Program (HPTP) of Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute in Punjab, Pakistan. Majority (32/50) of the HBV/HDV co-infection were identified from Rajanpur clinic of HPTP. Pre-treatment liver tests, HBV-DNA viral load, HDV-RNA viral load; AST to Platelet ratio (APRI) and Fibrosis-4 (Fib-4) were calculated from standard equations. Cirrhosis was based on APRI (≥1.5) or/and Fib4 (≥1.45). HBV-DNA level ≤ 2,000 IU and ≥20,000 IU were categorized as low and high viral load respectively. Results: 57 (53%) patients were HBV mono-infected and 50 (47%) were co-infected with HDV. Mean age was 36.2±12.99 in the entire cohort and was not different between the two groups. Older age correlated to a higher APRI and Fib-4 scores in both groups. The two groups were predominantly male, 75% in HBV and 76% HBV/HDV co-infected patients. Sharing of toothbrushes was reported to be significantly higher by HBV mono-infected patients; p 0.005. Other risk factors were equally prevalent. 78% of HBV mono-infected and 79% HBV/HDV co-infected patients had ≤ 20,000 IU/ml HBV-DNA. While 56% and 44% had ≤ 2,000 IU/ml HBV DNA levels respectively. APRI and Fib-4 scores were significantly higher in HBV/HDV coinfected; p 0.01. The cirrhosis was diagnosed in 29 patients in HBV/HDV co-infected group, while no patient had cirrhosis in HBV mono-infected group. Within HBV/HDV co-infected group, mean HDV-viral load was significantly higher compared to HBV viral load; p 0.05. Mean HBV-DNA and HDV RNA levels in non-cirrhotics were 326411 and 35358369; and in cirrhotics 3340429 and 31867418 IU/ ml, respectively. 4 patients had undetectable HBV viral load and one of them had cirrhosis. 10 patients were cirrhotics with ≤ 2,000 IU/ml of HBV-DNA. The mean HDV RNA level in these 10 patients was 63, 000000 IU/ml. Mean HDV viral load was one log higher in patients with ≤20,000 IU/ml HBV-DNA compared to those with ≥ 20,000 IU/ml HBV-DNA viral load. Conclusion: Overall mode of transmission of HBV and HBV/HDV infections are similar in Punjab. More patients had higher liver fibrosis scores in HDV/HBV co-infected groups. The significantly low level of HBV, in the co-infected population especially cirrhotic patients indicates that liver disease is driven by HDV rather than HBV infection among co-infected Pakistani patients and Peg-interferon alone might be the best treatment option for them.
Journal of Virology, 2011
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis delta virus (HDV) interplay was investigated by examining liver and serum samples from 21 coinfected and 22 HBV-monoinfected patients with chronic liver disease. Different real-time PCR assays were applied to evaluate intrahepatic amounts of HBV DNA, covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA), pregenomic RNA (pgRNA), pre-S/S RNAs, and HDV RNA. Besides HBV DNA and HDV RNA levels, HBsAg concentrations in the sera were also determined. HDV-coinfected cases showed significantly lower median levels of serum HBV DNA (؊5 log), intrahepatic relaxed-circular DNA (؊2 log), and cccDNA (؊2 log) than those of HBV-monoinfected cases. Interestingly, pgRNA and pre-S/S RNA amounts were significantly lower (both ؊1 log) in HDV-positive patients, whereas serum HBsAg concentrations were comparable between the two patient groups. Pre-S/S RNA and HBsAg amounts per cccDNA molecule were higher in HDV-positive patients (3-fold and 1 log, respectively), showing that HBV replication was reduced, whereas synthesis of envelope proteins was not specifically decreased. The ratios of cccDNA to intracellular total HBV DNA showed a larger proportion of cccDNA molecules in HDV-positive cases. For these patients, both intrahepatic and serum HDV RNA amounts were associated with cccDNA but not with HBsAg or HBV DNA levels. Finally, HBV genomes with large deletions in the basal core promoter/precore region were detected in 5/21 HDV-positive patients but in no HDV-negative patients and were associated with lower viremia levels. These findings provide significant information about the interference exerted by HDV on HBV replication and transcription activities in the human liver.