Mesenchymal Stem Cell Senescence and Osteogenesis (original) (raw)

Cellular senescence and longevity of osteophyte-derived mesenchymal stem cells compared to patient-matched bone marrow stromal cells

Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, 2009

This study aimed to determine the cellular aging of osteophyte-derived mesenchymal cells (oMSCs) in comparison to patient-matched bone marrow stromal cells (bMSCs). Extensive expansion of the cell cultures was performed and early and late passage cells (passages 4 and 9, respectively) were used to study signs of cellular aging, telomere length, telomerase activity, and cell-cycle-related gene expression. Our results showed that cellular aging was more prominent in bMSCs than in oMSCs, and that oMSCs had longer telomere length in late passages compared with bMSCs, although there was no significant difference in telomere lengths in the early passages in either cell type. Telomerase activity was detectable only in early passage oMSCs and not in bMSCs. In osteophyte tissues telomerase-positive cells were found to be located perivascularly and were Stro-1 positive. Fifteen cell-cycle regulator genes were investigated and only three genes (APC, CCND2, and BMP2) were differentially expressed between bMSC and oMSC. Our results indicate that oMSCs retain a level of telomerase activity in vitro, which may account for the relatively greater longevity of these cells, compared with bMSCs, by preventing replicative senescence.

Enhancing survival, engraftment, and osteogenic potential of mesenchymal stem cells

World Journal of Stem Cells, 2019

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are promising candidates for bone regeneration therapies due to their plasticity and easiness of sourcing. MSC-based treatments are generally considered a safe procedure, however, the long-term results obtained up to now are far from satisfactory. The main causes of these therapeutic limitations are inefficient homing, engraftment, and osteogenic differentiation. Many studies have proposed modifications to improve MSC engraftment and osteogenic differentiation of the transplanted cells. Several strategies are aimed to improve cell resistance to the hostile microenvironment found in the recipient tissue and increase cell survival after transplantation. These strategies could range from a simple modification of the culture conditions, known as cell-preconditioning, to the genetic modification of the cells to avoid cellular senescence. Many efforts have also been done in order to enhance the osteogenic potential of the transplanted cells and induce bone formation, mainly by the use of bioactive or biomimetic scaffolds, although alternative approaches will also be discussed. This review aims to summarize several of the most recent approaches, providing an up-to-date view of the main developments in MSC based regenerative techniques.

Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells: Aging and tissue engineering applications to enhance bone healing

Biomaterials, 2018

Bone has well documented natural healing capacity that normally is sufficient to repair fractures and other common injuries. However, the properties of bone change throughout life, and aging is accompanied by increased incidence of bone diseases and compromised fracture healing capacity, which necessitate effective therapies capable of enhancing bone regeneration. The therapeutic potential of adult mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for bone repair has been long proposed and examined. Actions of MSCs may include direct differentiation to become bone cells, attraction and recruitment of other cells, or creation of a regenerative environment via production of trophic growth factors. With systemic aging, MSCs also undergo functional decline, which has been well investigated in a number of recent studies. In this review, we first describe the changes in MSCs during aging and discuss how these alterations can affect bone regeneration. We next review current research findings on bone tissue en...

Age-Related Osteogenic Potential of Mesenchymal Stromal Stem Cells from Human Vertebral Bone Marrow

Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1999

other cell types. In humans, the age-related decrease in bone mass could reflect decreased osteoblasts secondary to an age-related loss of osteoprogenitors. To test this hypothesis, BM cells were isolated from vertebral bodies of thoracic and lumbar spine (T1-L5) from 41 donors (16 women and 25 men) of various ages (3-70 years old) after death from traumatic injury. Primary cultures were grown in alpha modified essential medium with fetal bovine serum for 13 days until adherent cells formed colonies (CFU-Fs). Colonies that stained positive for alkaline phosphatase activity (CFU-F/ALP + ) were considered to have osteogenic potential. BM nucleated cells were plated (0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, or 10 × 10 6 cells/10-cm dish) and grown in dexamethasone (Dex), which promotes osteoblastic differentiation. The optimal plating efficiency using BM-derived cells from donors of various ages was 5 × 10 6 cells/10-cm dish. BM-derived cells were also grown in the absence of Dex at this plating density. At the optimal plating density, in the presence of Dex, the number of CFU-F/ALP + present in the BM of the younger donors (3-36 years old) was 66.2 ± 9.6 per 10 6 cells (mean ± SEM), but only 14.7 ± 2.6 per 10 6 cells in the older donors (41-70 years old). With longer-term culture (4-5 weeks) of these BM cells in medium containing 10 mM ␤-glycerophosphate and 100 µg/ml ascorbic acid, the extracellular matrix mineralized, a result consistent with mature osteoblastic function. These results demonstrate that the number of MSCs with osteogenic potential (CFU-F/ALP + ) decreases early during aging in humans and may be responsible for the age-related reduction in osteoblast number. Our results are particularly important in that the vertebrae are a site of high turnover osteoporosis and, possibly, the earliest site of bone loss in age-related osteoporosis. (J Bone Miner Res 1999;14:1115-1122)

The Modulatory Effects of Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Osteoclastogenesis

Stem Cells International, 2016

The effect of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) on bone formation has been extensively demonstrated through severalin vitroandin vivostudies. However, few studies addressed the effect of MSCs on osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption. Under physiological conditions, MSCs support osteoclastogenesis through producing the main osteoclastogenic cytokines, RANKL and M-CSF. However, during inflammation, MSCs suppress osteoclast formation and activity, partly via secretion of the key anti-osteoclastogenic factor, osteoprotegerin (OPG).In vitro, co-culture of MSCs with osteoclasts in the presence of high concentrations of osteoclast-inducing factors might reflect thein vivoinflammatory pathology and prompt MSCs to exert an osteoclastogenic suppressive effect. MSCs thus seem to have a dual effect, by stimulating or inhibiting osteoclastogenesis, depending on the inflammatory milieu. This effect of MSCs on osteoclast formation seems to mirror the effect of MSCs on other immune cells, and may be e...

Briefly about Mesenchymal Stem Cells - One of the Main Players in Bone Tissue Engineering

Advances in Cytology & Pathology

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent stem cells with high self-renewal capacity, ability to differentiate into osteoblasts, adipocytes and chondroblasts, immunomodulating properties and lack of teratogenic potential. These cells have been recognized to be suitable for the needs of regenerative medicine and bone tissue engineering. The presented mini-review summarizes information about biological characteristics (advantages and challenges) of MSCs of various tissue origin.

Circulating mesenchymal stem cells with abnormal osteogenic differentiation in patients with osteoporosis

Arthritis & Rheumatism, 2009

Objective. While the role of osteoclasts in bone loss has been well investigated, the involvement of osteoblast-lineage cells has not been completely elucidated. Several genes contribute to normal osteoblastic differentiation from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), but an understanding of their role in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis is still lacking. The present study was undertaken to evaluate a possible alteration of osteogenic gene expression as a mechanism contributing to bone loss. Methods. We studied the osteogenic differentiation process in MSCs obtained from the peripheral blood of 31 patients with osteoporosis and 20 normal donors. The cells were evaluated by colony-forming unit-fibroblastic assay and cultured in osteogenic medium to analyze the transcription factors runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX-2) and Sp7 and the bone-related genes COL1A1, SPARC, and SPP1 after 3, 8, and 15 days of differentiation. In addition, to determine possible differences between the 2 groups in terms of osteoclastic and osteoblastic activation, we quantified the osteoprotegerin (OPG) and RANKL levels in the supernatants of osteoblastic culture. Results. Circulating MSCs were increased in osteoporosis patients compared with normal donors. In contrast, gene expression analysis revealed downregulation of RUNX2, Sp7, COL1A1, SPARC, and SPP1 in patients with osteoporosis, associated with a lower OPG:RANKL ratio. Conclusion. These results suggest that an alteration of osteoblastic differentiation may contribute to the pathogenesis of osteoporosis. The noninvasive approach used in the present study could be proposed as a useful tool for studying mesenchymal involvement in bone diseases. Osteoporosis is a common age-related skeletal disease characterized by bone loss, which increases skeletal fragility. Postmenopausal osteoporosis is caused primarily by estrogen deficiency after cessation of ovarian function, leading to bone loss due to increased bone turnover and negative bone-remodeling (1). Bone remodeling plays a major role in the maintenance of the skeleton's mechanical integrity and involves a wellcoordinated balance between bone formation (by osteoblasts) and bone resorption (by osteoclasts) (2). An imbalance in bone remodeling, in which bone formation is not able to compensate for bone resorption, is the main mechanism leading to osteoporosis and bone fragility. While the role of increased activity of osteoclasts has been extensively studied, the involvement of osteoblasts and osteocytes has not been well elucidated. Osteoblasts derive from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), which are multipotent progenitor cells with the capacity to differentiate into connective tissue cells (3). Although bone marrow is believed to be the main source of these precursor cells (4), MSCs can be isolated from peripheral blood (5,6) as well as from nonhematopoietic tissue such as adipose tissue, trabecular bone, dermis, dental pulp, synovium, and lung (7). Osteoblast differentiation, though not completely understood, is known to be a well-coordinated process regulated by signal transduction networks and specific transcriptional factors such as runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX-2) and Osterix (Osx). RUNX-2 (also called Cbfa1) is known to be essential for osteoblastic differentiation, because mice with its null mutation exhibit as complete lack of bone

Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Bone Development Bone Repair, and Skeletal Regeneration Therapy

Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, 1994

Bone formation in the embryo, and during adult fracture repair and remodeling, involves the progeny of a small number of cells called mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). These cells continuously replicate themselves, while a portion become committed to mesenchymal cell lineages such as bone, cartilage, tendon, ligament, and muscle. The differentiation of these cells, within each lineage, is a complex multistep pathway involving discrete cellular transitions much like that which occurs during hematopoiesis. Progression from one stage to the next depends on the presence of specific bioactive factors, nutrients, and other environmental cues whose exquisitely controlled contributions orchestrate the entire differentiation phenomenon. An understanding of the cellular and molecular events of osteogenic differentiation of MSCs provides the foundation for the emergence of a new therapeutic technology for cell therapy. The isolation and in vitro mitotic expansion of autologous human MSCs will support the development of novel protocols for the treatment of many clinically challenging conditions. For example, local bone defects can be repaired through site-directed delivery of MSCs in an appropriate carrier vehicle. Generalized conditions, such as osteoporosis, may be treatable by systemic administration of culture-expanded autologous MSCs or through biopharmaceutical regimens based on the discovery of critical regulatory molecules in the differentiation process. With this in mind, we can begin to explore therapeutic options that have never before been available.

Mesenchymal Stem Cells Repress Osteoblast Differentiation Under Osteogenic-Inducing Conditions

Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, 2015

This study was designed to investigate the influence of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) on osteoblast (OB) differentiation. Rat bone marrow MSCs were cultured either in growth medium that maintained a MSC phenotype or in osteogenic medium that induced differentiation into OBs. Then, cells were grown in two different culture conditions: indirect co-culture of MSCs and OBs and OBs cultured in MSC-conditioned medium. As a control culture condition, OBs were grown in osteogenic medium without the influence of MSCs. We evaluated cell proliferation, the gene expression of key bone markers, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, bone sialoprotein (BSP) expression, and extracellular matrix mineralization. The results showed that, regardless of whether OBs were indirectly co-cultured with MSCs or cultured in MSC-conditioned medium, MSCs repressed OB differentiation, as evidenced by the downregulation of all evaluated bone marker genes, decreased ALP activity, inhibition of BSP protein expression, and reduced extracellular matrix mineralization. Taken together, these results indicate that despite the key role of both MSCs and OBs in the osteogenic process, the repressive effect of MSCs on OB differentiation in an osteogenic environment may represent a barrier to the strategy of using them together in cell-based therapies to induce bone repair.