Exit, Voice, and Loyalty within the Judiciary:
Judges’ Responses to New Managerialism in the Netherlands (original) (raw)
Sign up for access to the world's latest research.
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
2015
3 This rule is not entirely implicit. The Code of Conduct of the Association for the Judiciary (the professional association for judges and prosecutors) declares that judges should be aware of their professional role when acting in public and that judges, other than in the capacity of the judge who is responsible for briefing the press or in academic publications, should not express their views on the judgments of colleagues.
Controlling the Courts: New Public Management and the Dutch Judiciary
Justice System Journal
Like many public sector organizations, in the past decades the Dutch judiciary has come to adopt New Public Management (NPM) practices and processes. In this article, we analyze this adoption from a management and organizational control perspective. Using data from a large survey among Dutch judges, we see a "mismatch" between the nature of the NPM-inspired management control systems and the work-related experiences of the judges and inquire into the consequences thereof for judicial work and organization.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.