Does ICT diffusion Increase Government Responsiveness in Autocracies? An Empirical Assessment of the Political Implications of China's Internet (original) (raw)
Related papers
Why does China Have Internet? Contagion, contingency and strategy in China's ICT management
By the end of 2015, every second Chinese will have access to the Internet. The ability of an increasing number of Chinese people to communicate and consume online has inspired a wide array of scholarship on topics such as censorship, surveillance and the use of social media. While much of this research is premised on the notion of antagonistic state-society relations, the impact of state-sponsored and Internet-based channels of communication between government officials and Chinese individuals on the transformation of China’s one-party authoritarian regime remains poorly understood. This article addresses this issue by examining China’s e-government strategy in relation both to global developments and to the changing incentives that have driven political reform in China in the past two decades. It argues that the confluence of two challenges has benefited the integration of the Internet into China’s governance apparatus. The first challenge was that avoiding the Internet would have come at prohibitive economic cost. If economic development was to continue, there was no way past the Internet. The second challenge was China’s brittle governance apparatus at the time, which hindered economic development and was deemed unfit to meet the demands of an increasingly assertive population.
Internet democracy – is the Internet a democratizing force in China
Since the commercialisation of the Internet in the mid-1990s, its penetration worldwide has increased exponentially. The characteristics of the Internet provide constant and instant communication between people worldwide. Some scholars argue that the Internet represents a democratizing force and will certainly influence authoritarian regimes, such as China's. Others doubt that the Internet will change the persistent structures of those regimes (Chi, 2012). In 1995, the Internet was commercially available for Chinese citizens. A year later, China’s government also implemented a complex system of surveillance methods, known as the Great Firewall, one of the biggest surveillance methods of the Internet worldwide (Kluver & Qiu, 2003). This raises interesting questions: Can the Internet lead to a democratisation process in China? Does the Internet have the capacity to provoke political change in China’s regime and make it a democracy in the future? Does the Chinese government intends to develop a democracy in China? Nevertheless, due to its political environment, its extensive population and its high rate of Internet penetration, China is considered the “most compelling case study for examining political impact of the Internet” (Kluver & Qiu, 2003, p. 26). Since the author likewise considered China with its complexity an interesting case study, this paper intends to find answers to the questions mentioned above. In the first chapter, an overview of the development of the Internet in is given because the author decided it was necessary to understand the development of the Internet in China within its political environment from the time of its commercialisation. Then the Internet usage by Chinese citizens and by the Chinese government is contemplated. The definition of democracy in China differs from the one used by the Western world. In the second chapter, the most important aspects that define and distinguish the definition of democracy used in China are presented. Furthermore, two common theories – mobilization theory and reinforcement theory –, that were commonly used by scholars, are introduced. Finally, the results of the literature review concerning the influence of the Internet on the democratisation process are presented.
INTERNET AND POLITICAL PARTICIPATION IN CHINA
Two decades ago, some scholars predicted that information technology would lead to political participatory democracy (Masuda 1985). Today this prediction remains largely as an ideal, even in technologically developed societies. However, this does not mean that technology has no role to play in participatory democracy. This article reported a case study on the role of internet in promoting political participation in China. It was observed that the rapid development of internet technology and application in China and the government's enthusiasm for advocating political communication via internet shone a gleam on the country's path towards political democracy, yet the democratising journey did not appear to be smooth at all. The study showed a constellation of issues crying for resolution, including enormous interregional and intra-regional digital divides, lack of interest in participation amongst the majority of internet users, and strict media regulation system. It was concluded that the ultimate functioning of internet as a political participation platform is determined not by the technology, but by human, including the authority and the citizenry, who use the technology and act as actors on the platform. Inter-net is no better than any other information technology, therefore should not be given undue weight regarding its impact on political participation. Finally the article suggested that for successful political democratisation, China must, on the one hand, lift further its control over the media system to allow more open and free
Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 2012
This paper seeks to understand the role of the Internet and information and communications technology (ICT) in potential democratic movements. We propose an ecological model of technological development and democratization which recognizes that change can occur (1) at individual as well as social levels; (2) on a continuum from oppression to freedom; and (3) in multiple social spheres. Using case studies from China, we suggest that ICT might facilitate democracy on account of its potential transformations and efficiencies in terms of individuals’ relationships to knowledge and information; governments; persons, groups, and nongovernmental organizations; and work and traditional social roles.
This article explores the communicative structures of Chinese government web sites and their implications for citizen political participation. Taking issue with the party-state's dubious claim of building a transparent, service-oriented, and democratic administration, the study analyzed web features on 31 Chinese provincial government portals. The UN's e-participation framework was adapted to locate venues for citizen involvement. The results suggest that by manipulating online structures, Chinese government resorts to more subtle forms of online social control through information delivery, agenda setting, and containment of public dissent. Limited improvement in administrative efficiency and transparency serves the dual role of deflating social tension and reestablishing party legitimacy. Paradoxically, citizens' political participation may generate unintended consequences of incremental reform of China's local governance and political institutions.
Digital communication and political change in China
International Journal of Communication, 2011
The popularization of digital media technologies in the People's Republic of China has led to the liberalization of public discourse and provided the citizenry with new opportunities for political advocacy. This article employs content analysis of newspapers and blogs to test information regime theory and finds considerable evidence of a transformation in the properties of political communication. Chinese Communist Party-led institutions, however, have responded to new challenges with legal and technological measures designed to control and guide political expression. The authors consider evidence that suggests new media have empowered China's "netizens" and diminished the state's ability to set the public agenda and shape political preferences. power of the new media technologies to liberalize political discourse and facilitate public supervision of the Chinese Communist Party . Recent efforts by the authoritarian state to grapple with the challenges that new media pose to information control suggest, however, the necessity for new approaches to consider how popularization of the Internet is changing Chinese politics. We examine empirical evidence concerning the political effects of digital communication as a test of information regime theory and find that China's information revolution has radically transformed the relationship between state and societal actors.
The Co-Evolution of the Internet, (Un)Civil Society & Authoritarianism in China
The Internet, Social Media, and a Changing China, 2016
This paper extends Guobin Yang’s 2003 seminal article on the co-evolution of the Internet and civil society in China. It argues the Internet has both facilitated the growth of civic spaces and empowered authoritarianism. Not only has the Internet amplified civic discourses and group formations, it also has augmented the influence of the authoritarian state as well as uncivil interactions online, leading to a greater degree of fragmentation and cynicism of public opinion. Although social media platforms such as the Twitter-like Sina Weibo can serve as a critical space for expressing and channeling public opinion, especially during times of crisis, they are unlikely to be the ultimate game changer.
International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 2020
This study addresses the relationships among internet use, public demand for democracy (PDD), and democracy development using four East Asian nations based on social cognitive theory (SCT). Specifically, the present study compares how the internet use influences democracy development directly and via public demand for democracy in both developing democracy such as Thailand, Malaysia, China, and comparatively developed democracy such as South Korea. Data for the study comes from Asian barometer surveys. Our results indicate that internet use strongly influences public demand for democracy in all four nations and democracy development is positively influenced by public demand for democracy in all the nations studied. We also find out that the effects of demographics on democracy development (and on internet use) are different in each of the four nations. The results are explained and implications provided.