(Un)Exceptional Trauma, Existential Insecurity, and Anxieties of Modern Subjecthood: A Phenomenological Analysis of Arbitrary Sovereign Violence (original) (raw)
This article examines the lasting phenomenological consequences of inhabiting “spaces” of exception by rethinking the operation of sovereign violence therein. Taking as its point of departure Giorgio Agamben’s suggestion that the ‘state of exception’ is the ‘rule’ of modern politics, I argue that arbitrary sovereign violence has taken the place of the ‘sovereign decision’ of Carl Schmitt’s original theory. However, recognizing that it is neither enough simply to articulate the institutional grid of intelligibility of the state of exception nor expose the logics of sovereignty that make possible arbitrary violence, it draws on phenomenology, affect theory, and trauma studies to reorient our focus from the sovereign to the subject upon whom sovereign power is executed. Ultimately it proposes a new understanding of modern subjecthood as one of existential insecurity generated by the ‘new age of anxiety’ permeating social and political life today.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research.
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
Human Sovereignty Eclipsed? Toward a Posthumanist Reading of the Traumatized Subject in
2021
The main aim of this article is to analyse J.M. Coetzee's Disgrace (1999) from a posthumanist perspective. By focusing on the character David Lurie, this article analyses the complex materiality of bodies and the agentic powers of nonhuman entities in coping with individual trauma, where agency is no longer considered to be the distinguishing quality unique to humans. In so doing, it highlights the interdependence of the human and the nonhuman and the idea that environment is not a mere canvas onto which characters' traumas are being reflected. On the contrary, it is a material-affective matrix which becomes a catalyst for making sense of the world in post-apartheid South Africa. At the same time, as this article argues, it decentres the sovereignty of the human subject.
“The Other Otherwise : Law, Historical Trauma and the Severed Gardens of Justice”
Polemos: Journal of Law, Literature and Culture, 2014
Historical discontinuity has yet to find a place in the theoretical framework of comparative legal studies. ‘Evil’ legal systems, residues or re-enactments of authoritarian legal practices seem to introduce a specific fracture in the symbolic construction of legal discourse. Indeed, when dealing with traumatic encounters, with the violence underlying the law, legal theory faces the paradox of discontinuity. Cases at the limit of law, normative structures marked historically by their complicity with violence, present themselves as a challenge for the seemingly universal tenets of the liberal democratic nomos as well as for its theoretical strategies of legitimation. In this way they represent the Other of our ideological consensus. This paper aims to explore the issue of discontinuity in relation to historical trauma and law. Drawing on psychoanalytical literature developed around the traumatic status of the Real, it argues that in order to approach authoritarian normative structures a comparative gaze is necessary regardless of the apparent cultural and historical unity of the legal order in which they emerge. In this sense, it challenges both the universalist claim of transcendental values forming legal discourse, as well as the basic assumption of the unity of a legal system. In a first part I will critically analyse the ontological tenets of the dominant discourse in the field of legal theory and comparative legal studies, one which is founded upon a mythical assertion of oneness as a stable ground for the symbolic construction of the law. I shall turn then towards psychoanalysis in order to formulate a theoretical framework which would be appropriate in approaching historical otherness as embedded in law. Drawing on the paradoxes engendered by the state of exception and totalitarian legal systems, I shall try to provide a synoptic reading of historical trauma with reference to the construction of legal meaning. In a last part, I aim to defend a critical theoretical project of radical comparatism in relation to law’s inherent otherness.
Power at the heart of the present: exception, risk and sovereignty
2010
This article argues that the notion of power is less important as a theoretical concept that can guide research than as an orientation towards the present. As such, it foregoes a focus on agencies of power for an engagement with relations and mechanisms of power and what Foucault terms a 'critical ontology of ourselves'. It notes that the first decade of the 21st century has witnessed different series of catastrophic events, such as 9/11 or the financial meltdown of September 2008. These events appear as markers of a crisis of neoliberalism as both governmentality and metaphysics. The elements of an emerging set of relations of power include the security complex characterized by the language of the exception, the rationality of precautionary risk, new techniques of security, and recharged and often militant forms of sovereignty capable of delegation by and derogation from the state. It is the understanding of this 'dispositif', its ambiguities and consequences, captured by a broad range of cultural, political and social studies, which locates the relations of power that lie at the heart of many current contestations. Given the fecundity and creativity of these analyses, such studies would appear to call into question the project of a theory of power.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.