The Indonesianization of West Papua: Development of Indonesia's Attitudes and Policies towards West Papua and the Dynamics of the Papua Freedom Movement (original) (raw)
Related papers
JAS (Journal of ASEAN Studies)
This research argues that the internationalization of "West Papua" issue through social media has contributed to a shift of Indonesia's policy to the South Pacific region from ignorance to initiative approach. Underlying this argument is a growing concern of Indonesia regarding the use of social media by Papuan pro-independence activists that resulted to the increasing awareness and support towards the independence of West Papua from Pacific countries as human rights problems become the highlight of West Papua’s issue. The method used in this research was qualitative research method focusing on descriptive analysis of the internationalization of West Papua issue on social media. This research results show that initiative approach from Indonesia is merely narrowing the gap of the issue instead of reducing the internationalization of the West Papua issue.
2011
This chapter is based on my study on West Papua of 2005, which has been published in English under the title: An Act of Free Choice. Decolonization and the Right to Self-Determination in West Papua (Oneworld Oxford 2009; see www.oneworld-publications.com). An Indonesian translation appeared under the title Tindakan Pilihan Bebas. Orang Papua dan
Spectres of indonesianisation and secession in Papua
In this book chapter, I trace and sketch the backgrounds of social, economic and political fault lines in Indonesian Papua. While reformasi policy makers in Jakarta have developed a series of inconsistent policies towards In- donesia’s easternmost province over the last few years, the reactions of local elites in Papua are more than merely reactionary. For example, the apparent endorsement of the Indonesian state by supporters of Abraham Atururi (the transitional Governor of Irian Jaya Barat who proceeded the current interim Governor Timbul Pujianto) has provoked a fundamental challenge to those elites who seek to maintain and consolidate their recent political gains under a Special Autonomy (Otsus) law written for a uni- fied Papua. From 2000 till 2005, this political lobby was led, among others, by the late Jaap Solossa, then Governor of Papua, his Vice Governor, Con- stan Karma, and the Speaker of the Representative Council (DPR, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat) Papua, John Ibo.
Trouble in Paradise: Papua-Indonesia Conflict in a Glance An Incomplete Literature Review
My literature review from 2016. Updates are coming soon as this essay will become Chapter One of my thesis. Due for submission in 2019 This literature review started with the hypothesis that there is a thick line dividing researchers on the Papua-Indonesia conflict. One side is the Indonesian researchers with their loyalty to Indonesia's dogma of unity who would fanatically defend Indonesia's claim of Papua. On the other side of the line is the Western or Eurocentric researchers and Papuan people abroad who insists that Papua should be independent from Indonesia. Through reading of the available literature on Papua, the researcher found that the division is not as black and white initially thought. Though the hypothesis was good to start with, the Papua-Indonesia conflict is much more complex than what the researcher hypothesised at the start of the literature search. In this literature review, the researcher endeavours to explore the complexity of the Papua-Indonesia conflict starting with the three different versions of history, followed by the role of the Melanesian nations, and the actors in Papua-Indonesia conflict. The review will conclude in a number of recommendations for conflict resolution and an idea that link to the researcher's main area: using participatory video to include the opinions, wishes and feelings of indigenous women of Papua in the decision-making process. 2 In this review, the researcher is using her journalism method of searching for information sources. While aware of the conventional academic way of literature search using the university database and library catalogue, this preliminary research is based on reading material gathered from researcher's last trip to Papua and Indonesia, general search engines, as well as discussions and interviews with sources within the Papuan community, human right activists and Indonesian students in the UK. The researcher is aware that a more systematic and thorough literature search will need to be conducted in the near future to comply with academic standards for postgraduate research, however the researcher feels that journalism as a method would need to be included here as it is part of her own 'native' background.
Managing Conflicts in a Globalizing ASEAN: Incompatibility Management Through Good Governance, 2020
The Republic of Indonesia has administered West Papua since 1963, following a United Nations Temporary Executive Authority (UNTEA) agreement of 1962. Six years later, the Indonesian government held the controversial “Act of Free Choice” that led to the territory’s official integration into the Republic of Indonesia. While West Papuan nationalists argue that the “Act of Free Choice” was a fraudulent process undertaken with the tacit agreement of the international community that denied them the right to self-determination, successive Indonesian governments have considered the Act binding and legal and rejected any possibility of West Papuan self-determination. The chapter begins with an overview of West Papua’s integration into the Dutch East Indies and early Dutch policy in relation to the territory. This is followed by a discussion on the conflict between Indonesia and the Netherlands over the future and status of West Papua. The chapter then turns to West Papua’s integration into the Republic of Indonesia, which represents the first major incompatibility in the conflict. The remaining parts of the chapter focus on the post integration period and examines how successive Indonesian governments have attempted to manage the conflict, and various West Papuan initiatives, up to the present day
Indonesian repression and betrayal in West Papua [Review]
Pacific Journalism Review, 2018
Papua Blood: A Photographer’s Eyewitness Account of West Papua Over 30 Years, by Peter Bang. Copenhagen, Denmark: Remote Frontlines, 2018. 248 pages. ISBN 978-87-430-0101-0 See No Evil: New Zealand’s Betrayal of the People of West Papua, by Maire Leadbeater. Dunedin, NZ: Otago University Press, 2018. 310 pages. ISBN 978-1-98-853121-2 TWO damning and contrasting books about Indonesian colonialism in the Pacific, both by activist participants in Europe and New Zealand, have recently been published. Overall, they are excellent exposés of the harsh repression of the Melanesian people of West Papua and a world that has largely turned a blind eye to to human rights violations.
2008
This article explores the modes by which Australian scholars construct knowledge of Indonesia with particular reference to the debates on West Papua in the post-Suharto period. It examines their perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards human rights issues with a view to analysing the underlying forces, motivations and implications of activism. This article casts doubt on a common, yet often unacknowledged, perception in Indonesia about Australian Indonesia-specialists who are categorised as: intellectuals who always see Indonesian government policies as 'negative'.2 I demonstrate that the theorisation of Indonesian society has been diverse in Australia as exemplified by the West Papua debates. Australian scholars' social positions and mobility, not government policy, shape their beliefs, attitudes and knowledge construction of Indonesia. Thus, considering Australian scholars from a monolithic perspective misses the reality that contemporary intellectual culture in A...
Jurnal Humaniora, 2017
Another international published research voicing yet the Papua quandary was written by author Bobby Anderson, a non-Indonesian research worker who has been conducting much work in the area. Published in 2015, Papua’s Insecurity: State Failure in the Indonesian Periphery is part of the Policy Studies series, an ongoing publication project by the U.S.-based education and research institution of the East-West Center. Issues of the series are based on fieldwork and academic study, that aim primarily to provide new perspectives and insights on stakeholders’ policies—and in the context of this particular publication, those in the Papua region. It is also noteworthy that the series, tallying to the platform of the above-stated organization, cover the areas of Asia and have target readers comprised particularly of policy and business communities, academics, journalists, and the informed public who probably also hold a special interest in the relations between the U.S. and the region.