Development and primary validation of the School Health Assessment Tool for Primary Schools (SHAT-PS) (original) (raw)
Related papers
School health assessment tools: a systematic review of measurement in primary schools
PeerJ
Background This systematic review aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the school health’s assessment tools in primary schools through COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist. We examined the studies that have addressed the measurement properties of school-health instruments to give a clear overview of the quality of all available tools measuring school health in primary schools. This systematic review was registered in PROPERO with the Registration ID: CRD42020158158. Method Databases of EBSCOhost, PubMed, ProQuest, Wily, PROSPERO, and OpenGrey were systematically searched without any time limitation to find all full-text English journal articles studied at least one of the COSMIN checklist measurement properties of a school-health assessment tool in primary schools. The instruments should be constructed based on a school health model. The eligible studies were assessed by COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist to report their quality of methodology for each measurement property and fo...
The Development of a Secondary School Health Assessment Model
2016
The objective of this research was to: 1) involved a survey of information relating to secondary school health, 2) involved the construction of a model of health assessment and a handbook for using the model in secondary school, 3) develop an assessment model for secondary school. The research included 3 phases. (1) involved a survey of information relating to secondary school health, which was performed by analyzing the approach and reviewing the related literature. The phase also involved synthesizing the factors associated with health in secondary school. (2) involved the construction of a model of health assessment and a handbook for using the model in secondary school. (3) the health assessment model for secondary school was applied to large, medium, and small schools to evaluate the model’s validity. In addition, the assessment model was evaluated based on its utility, feasibility, propriety, and accuracy. The research findings suggested the following: 1) The health assessment...
The Development and Use of the Healthy School Indicator Tool (HSIT)
Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 2005
Authors' Note: The authors wish to acknowledge the participation of the following members of the Comprehensive School Health (CSH) Committees, who have been managers of the project. We would like to thank the following members of the initial steering committee: ...
Validation of an instrument to evaluate health promotion at schools
OBJECTIVE: To validate an instrument designed to assess health promotion in the school environment. METHODS: A questionnaire, based on guidelines from the World Health Organization and in line with the Brazilian school health context, was developed to validate the research instrument. There were 60 items in the instrument that included 40 questions for the school manager and 20 items with direct observations made by the interviewer. The items' content validation was performed using the Delphi technique, with the instrument being applied in 53 schools from two medium-sized cities in the South region of Brazil. Reliability (Cronbach's alpha and split-half) and validity (principal component analysis) analyses were performed. RESULTS: The final instrument remained composed of 28 items, distributed into three dimensions: pedagogical, structural and relational. The resulting components showed good factorial loads (> 0.4) and acceptable reliability (> 0.6) for most items. The pedagogical dimension identifies educational activities regarding drugs and sexuality, violence and prejudice, auto care and peace and quality of life. The structural dimension is comprised of access, sanitary structure, and conservation and equipment. The relational dimension includes relationships within the school and with the community. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed instrument presents satisfactory validity and reliability values, which include aspects relevant to promote health in schools. Its use allows the description of the health promotion conditions to which students from each educational institution are exposed. Because this instrument includes items directly observed by the investigator, it should only be used during periods when there are full and regular activities at the school in question.
School Health Development Index (SHDI) as an Instrument for School Health Development
Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat
This study is a continuation study (second year); in the first year the dimensions and indicators of SHDI had been identified, and now we continue to develop SHDI instrument to find the school health development index. We used an instrumental development method, consisting of; 1) reviewing the concept, dimensions, and indicators of SHDI from the first years results, 2) developing blueprint of the instrument, 3) developing instruments draft, 4) instrument validation by experts, 5) revising instrument validation results, 6) practitioner testing (UKS teachers), 7) panel testing of instrument, 8) small group trial, 9) final instrument. The results showed that; 1) based on expert review, 90% of the items in the instrument is relevant, 2) from expert test, the instrument of SHDI was approved to be continued, 3) from the panel test there was a change in weightage and addition of health indicators, 4) the trial results showed that the instrument had a sufficient feasibility, and thus could ...
Applying the School Health Index to a Nationally Representative Sample of Schools
Journal of School Health, 2006
The School Health Index (SHI) is a self-assessment and planning tool that helps individual schools identify the strengths and weaknesses of their health policies and programs. To determine the percentage of US schools meeting the recommendations in the SHI, the present study analyzed data from the School Health Policies and Programs Study (SHPPS) 2000. The SHPPS 2000 data were collected through computer-assisted personal interviews with faculty and staff in a nationally representative sample of schools. The SHPPS 2000 questions were then matched to SHI items to calculate the percentage of schools meeting the recommendations in 4 areas: school health and safety policies and environment, health education, physical education and other physical activity programs, and nutrition services. Although schools nationwide are meeting a few SHI items in each of these areas, few schools are addressing the entire breadth of items. A more coordinated approach to school health would help schools reinforce health messages.
PEER REVIEWED: The School Health Index as an Impetus for Change
Preventing chronic …, 2005
Background The increase in childhood obesity and prevalence of chronic disease risk factors demonstrate the importance of creating healthy school environments. As part of the Border Health Strategic Initiative, the School Health Index was implemented in public ...
Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de santé publique
The purpose of this paper was to investigate the psychometric properties of a newly-designed scale intended to measure the perceived attributes of a Health Promoting School initiative and its context in terms of factor structure, reliability and predictive validity. The scale was developed to explore possible predictors of the adoption of the Healthy School approach (HS) in Québec. Data were gathered from a 2007 cross-sectional study of 107 schools and 141 participants (school principals and school health promotion delegates). The scale was based on 7 attributes borrowed from the theories on diffusion of innovation. The factor structure of the scale was tested by exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. The final scale included 14 items capturing 4 factors: school contextual barriers, collective efficacy, anticipated benefits and relative advantages. Reliability, in terms of internal consistency of the factors, ranged from a high of 0.85 to a low of 0.60. Three of the 4 factors...