Considering Human and Organizational Factors in Risk Industries (original) (raw)
Related papers
Improving human control of hazards in industry
Industrial accidents are still occurring at an unacceptable level. One way to reduce incidents is to better design industrial work systems so that humans can better recognise and manage hazards. In order to design work environments that support human’s ability to deliver safe and productive system performance, it is necessary to understand the humans, their work tasks, technology, organisational factors and external influences and how these have evolved and will continue to evolve over time. The aim of this study was to 1) gain insights into past, present and future work factors that affect human’s ability to safety manage industrial systems; 2) assess suitability of existing human factors and risk management methods to identify design improvement that would help humans deliver better system control and safety performance in industry both now and in the future. The study method involved conducting a review of literature to collect and collate information to identify important factors pertaining to the changing nature of human work in industrial contexts. The information from the literature review was then used to assess the benefits and limitations of current human factors and risk assessment techniques. The results of this study shows that the nature of human work, workers’ tasks, technology, organisational factors and external influences on industry have changed over time and will continue to change into the future. These changes can impact the way humans go about managing safety in hazardous industries. Most existing human factors and risk management techniques are limited in their ability to identify and manage contemporary human, technology, organisational interaction issues and opportunities. It is recommended that further work be done to develop techniques to suit the current and future industrial control scenarios.
Proceedings of the 2005 Annual Conference on European Association of Cognitive Ergonomics, 2005
A work context presents different levels of interest from the Human Factors perspective: together with technical analysis (about risk, reliability, errors management of an organization) the social aspects of an organizational reality acquire importance, as for example communications, social interactions and norms, and the shared values of the workers as members of a community. All these parameters have an influencing action about what is meant by safety, and how safety standards are perceived and followed in everyday practices. In this paper, Safety Culture is studied as basic instrument to guide the development of Human Factors training. In other words, Safety Culture, as set of shared values and norms socially transmitted regarding safety, is an important factor to be considered when approaching a work reality for a safety study.
The nature of safety culture: A survey of the state-of-the-art
Safety Science, 2007
This paper discusses the evolution of the term`safety culture' and the perceived relationship between safety culture and safety of operations in nuclear power generation and other hazardous technologies. There is a widespread belief that safety culture is an important contributor to safety of operations. Empirical evidence that safety culture and other management and organizational factors in¯uence operational safety is more readily available for the chemical process industry than for nuclear power plant operations. The commonly accepted attributes of safety culture include good organizational communications, good organizational learning, and senior management commitment to safety. Safety culture may be particularly important in reducing latent errors in complex, well-defended systems. The role of regulatory bodies in fostering strong safety cultures remains unclear, and additional work is required to de®ne the essential attributes of safety culture and to identify reliable performance indicators. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
Human Factors and Safety Management: a Field Study on Safety Performance in the Process Industry
2019
Human Factors and Safety Management: a Field Study on Safety Performance in the Process Industry Bruno Fabiano*, Margherita Pettinato, Andrea P. Reverberi, Fabio Currò a DICCA Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering Dept. – Genoa University, via Opera Pia, 15 – 16145 Genoa, Italy b DCCI Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry Dept. Genoa University, via Dodecaneso 31 16145 Genoa, Italy bruno.fabiano@unige.it
OTC-27015-MS Integration of Human Factors into Safety and Environmental Management Systems
This paper addresses human performance risk mitigation strategies for incorporation into a Safety and Environmental Management System (SEMS). A framework is provided that identifies human factors considerations and evaluation criteria needed for successful integration of Human Factors into a company's SEMS. A methodology is presented for assessing safety culture and the effectiveness of SEMS implementation. Results from employee surveys, taken across various high-risk industries, will be presented. The survey findings illustrate the common difficulties encountered in establishing and maintaining a strong safety culture and the challenges in achieving an effective SEMS.
Modelling risk in high hazard operations: integrating technical, organisational and cultural factors
Recent disasters in high hazard industries such as Oil and Gas Exploration (The Deepwater Horizon) and Petrochemical production (Texas City) have been found to have causes that range from direct technical failures through organizational shortcomings right up to weak regulation and inappropriate company cultures. Risk models have generally concentrated upon technical failures, which are easier to construct and for which there is more concrete data. The primary causes, as identified by the US Chemical Safety Board for Texas City and the Presidential Commission for the Deepwater Horizon, lie firmly rooted in the culture of the organization and determine the way in which individuals go about risky activities. Modelling human activities, especially collectively rather than individual human errors as is done in most human models, is a quite different proposition, in which complex interactions between different individuals and levels change over time as success and failure alter the pattern of payoffs. This paper examines the development of an integrated model for risk in a real-time environment for the hydrocarbon industry. It is based originally on the CATS model for commercial aviation safety, that first attempted to address some of these problems in a relatively simple way. Aviation is, however, a relatively simple activity, with large numbers of common components in a constrained environment. The Oil and Gas industry is significantly more diverse, covering the gamut from exploration, drilling, production, transport, refining and chemical production, each with its own potential for large scale disaster, but in the case of an integrated oil company all run by individuals within a common company culture. Other papers will cover the details of specific issues; this paper covers the integration of the model as a whole.
Safety Science, 2015
Workers in the steel-manufacturing industry face many safety risks due to the nature of the job. How well safety procedures and regulations are followed within an organization is considered to be influenced by the reigning culture of the organization. The aim of this study was to investigate and describe safety culture and risk-taking at a large steel-manufacturing company in Sweden by exploring workers' experiences and perceptions of safety and risks. Ten focus group interviews were conducted with a total of 66 workers. In the interviews, the situation of safety at work was discussed in a semi-structured manner. The material was analyzed inductively using qualitative content analysis. The analysis resulted in a thorough description of safety culture and risk-taking at the company, based on the following five main categories: 1. Acceptance of risks, one simply has to accept the safety risks of the work environment, 2. Individual responsibility for safety, the responsibility for safe procedures rests to the largest extent on the individual, 3. Trade-off between productivity and safety, these are conflicting entities, wanting to produce as well as wanting to work safely, 4. Importance of communication, it is needed for safety actions to be effective, and 5. State-of-the-day and external conditions, an interplay between these factors affect risk-taking. In sociotechnical systems theory it is acknowledged that there are interactions between social and technical factors in organizations. The findings of this study are interpreted to be in line with a sociotechnical understanding of safety culture and risk-taking.
Safety Cultures in the Safety Management Landscape
Safety Cultures, Safety Models, 2018
As an emerging scientific concept, the notion of "safety culture" presents obvious difficulties. But this does not preclude that it can be quite useful for the management of safety. However, the usual understanding of the concept lacks a reference to an explicit safety paradigm. It describes organizational features that are expected to foster safety, but does not explicitly mention the underlying assumptions about the safety strategy expected to make the system safe. Yet, there is no one single strategy to make a system safe. Even within a given organization, there must be a variety of strategies, with a different balance between predetermination and adaptation, and different levels of control on front line operators. Each of these safety management modes will inevitably generate the corresponding "safety culture". The underlying safety management mode behind the current safety culture vision is a non-punitive version of a normative and hierarchical safety management mode. However, evolving toward this mode does not necessarily mean that safety culture is becoming more mature. Recent catastrophic accidents have illustrated the increasing vulnerability of our systems to the unexpected, and illustrated the need for a refined safety paradigm.