Graced Religions. Ecumenical Perspectives on Revelation and Grace in the Theology of Interreligious Dialogue (original) (raw)
Related papers
Common grace as theological encouragement for interreligious dialogue
Acta Theologica
The Dutch theologian-statesman Abraham Kuyper developed the doctrine of common grace in a lengthy manner. Common grace emphasises that God’s grace operates not only in a salvific way for the elect, but also in a general way for every individual. Despite sin, human beings are capable of doing beautiful, just, and wise things and are endowed with gifts and talents, due to God’s act of common grace. On that doctrinal basis, Christians are called upon to appreciate the people outside the church, for there are fruits of common grace in their lives. On many occasions, Kuyper acknowledgedthat people of other religions have better qualities than Christians. Although not salvific, common grace opens various possibilities for Christians to learn from non-Christians. Thus, common grace could be a theological encouragement for interreligious dialogue toward mutual enrichment. This doctrine shows how the interreligious relationship between Christians and non-Christians should not be reduced to e...
The Experience of Grace in The Phenomenon of Interreligious Dialogue
International Journal of Indonesian Philosophy & Theology
This paper explores the experience of grace in the interreligious dialogue activists. The involvement of Catholic activists in this movement can be a locus for the experience of grace. Several theologians have recently discussed grace in a historical dimension. One of the theologians of the Second Vatican Council, Karl Rahner, had the idea of the experience of grace. Martin Heidegger's phenomenological hermeneutic method explores the experience of the grace of Catholic activists. In-depth interviews were used as a data collection technique. The research subjects were two Catholics, the National Meeting of Indonesian Youth from the Youth Commission of the Indonesian Bishops' Conference and one Catholic Young Interfaith Peacemaker Community. The results' novelty shows that the research subjects did not recognize grace as an extraordinary phenomenon. Inspired by the Church's teachings, they understand that grace is experienced as a process of living life's roles, un...
One of the main challenges to interreligious dialogue is in locating a proper balance between commitment to one's own religion while maintaining openness to the other. 1 "Can one combine openness and identity, dialogability and steadfastness in the interreligious dialogue?" 2 It is generally understood that the problem of the tensive relationship between identity and openness should be addressed from a theological perspective and that interreligious dialogue should be based on a correct theological evaluation of religious traditions. It is up to theological reflection to clarify why Christians must be open-or, conversely, should not be open-to those of other religions. It is theology that sets limits as to how far that openness extends and if there should be limits to one's openness when encountering the religious other. If Christians are to become more open, the questions of why this openness is appropriate (or not) and how this openness to the faith of another is related to one's own faith commitment, are answered, one by one, through theological reflection on, and interpretation of, religious diversity.
Dialogue with People of Other Faiths and Ecumenical Theology
Ecumenical Review, 1987
Christian ecumenism, as we have come to understand it in the course of this century, has been primarily concerned with intra-ecclesial unity. In the face of the plurality of theological positions and diversity of cultural expressions, it has been an ongoing pilgrimage on the part of churches in search of unity or a collective sense of identity without stifling diversity. With every progress made in visible expressions of unity or consensus in theological self-understanding, our horizons have gradually expanded. As this journey continues, the concerns of Christian ecumenical theology will be increasingly widened to include extra-ecclesial issues which impinge upon our evolving self-understanding and theological task.
THE THEOLOGY OF GRACE: PRESENT TRENDS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
ALTHOUGH THE theology of grace has not been an area of great contro-Zìi, versy in recent years, it has been the subject of a considerable amount of writing. In all of this writing there seems to be a certain tendency for each author to go off in a different direction, without much attention to the related efforts of others. It seems opportune, then, to survey the whole field of the theology of grace, to see what has been written of late, to try to discern the general direction in which theological thought is moving, to point out the problems which have arisen as a result of this movement, and to try to foresee the possibilities for future developments. The trend which is apparent in recent writings on grace is toward a theology which can be described as phenomenological, psychological, and personalist. The chief difficulties inherent in this approach seem to be methodological, involving the proper use of "personalist" categories to describe the realities of grace. Of my suggestions for future development, the central one is that we may find in contemporary psychology a model and a vocabulary for a theology of the relationship between God and man.
God's Universal Grace in Protestant Theology
God Needs No Defense, 2021
The doctrine that God is the supreme embodiment of unconditional love, or agape, is central to Christian theology. As the apostle John states in his First Epistle, "God is love." In some respects, this core theological doctrine resembles the Islamic concept of rahmah (universal love and compassion), which lies at the heart of the Humanitarian Islam movement. In the following essay, Thomas K. Johnson explores "eight biblical themes related to God's universal grace, themes which Christian theology has often related to knowing God the Father and his work of creation. All of these are themes to which Muslims can probably relate more easily than they can grasp the mysteries of a Trinity with which they are unfamiliar." The amazing growth of Christianity from obscurity toward becoming a global faith began when the first apostles spread out from Jerusalem to proclaim the novel message that God was reconciling the world to himself through a crucified but resurrected Savior. But most people overlook the fact that in their preaching, the early apostles repeatedly referred to the universal grace of God, especially when addressing people from a non-Jewish background. They seemed to believe that understanding the experience of God's universal grace provided the necessary background for their hearers to appreciate the special things that God had done in Christ. In our modern, globalized multi-religious context, we would do well to pay more attention to this feature of Christianity. 1
Calvin and ‘Communion Ecclesiology’: An Ecumenical Conversation
Theology Today, 66.2 (July 2009)., 2009
This essay evaluates John Calvin's ecclesiology-especially his emphasis on plural ministries-as a model for articulating a contemporary ecumenical ecclesiology in conversation with post-Vatican II "communion ecclesiology." Particular attention is given to the contributions of Latin American and U.S. Hispanic theologians whose liberating vision of church seeks to embody the very qualities Calvin affirmed in his doctrine of the church: a rejection of rigid hierarchical governance and an emphasis on God's grace as the very foundation of human community. This reflection on the relevance of John Calvin's ecclesiology for the ecumenical church is offered as a contribution to the discipline of systematic theology, understood as critical reflection on the Christian community's beliefs and practices in response to God's revelation (Gutiérrez). Thus, while historically informed, this article addresses the contemporary situation first and foremost. Furthermore, recognizing the contextuality of all systematic theologies (even when a particular theological "system" does not acknowledge its own cultural, political, and historical limitations), this work is offered as a U.S. Latino/a contribution to the broader conversations in both ecclesiology and Calvin studies.
The author explores the conciliar and post-conciliar documents of the Catholic Church in order to draw out the tensions and ambiguities of its position regarding the nature and role of revelation in the origin of non-Christian religions. Within the framework of this position, moderate Catholic theologians have argued that, as other religions have their origins in God’s specific self-disclosure, they differ only in degree from Christianity. Their arguments combined with an in-depth analysis of Church documents yields the conclusion that the position of the Catholic Church is logically amenable to an affirmation of religious pluralism de iure. If the Catholic Church desires to officially reject this conclusion, it must explicitly address the apparent inconsistencies that its own theologians find in this rejection.
Studies in Christian-Jewish Relations, 2011
Theologians have a particular task to provide discernment when expressing in interreligious dialogue the Christological proclamation that Jesus Christ is "'the way, the truth, and the life,' (Jn 14:6), in whom people may find the fullness of religious life, in whom God has reconciled all things to Himself" (Nostra Aetate, §3). Therefore, there is a need to renew the spirit of the Conciliar Declaration Nostra Aetate,, which reminds us that the Catholic Church rejects nothing that is true and holy in the other religions. The Church acknowledges with sincere reverence ("sincera cum observantia") that the other often religions reflect a ray of that Truth which enlightens all people. In this article, I highlight three different moments in which this sincere reverence towards other religions may be realized. The first moment may be called methodological and refers to the Ignatian tradition of the Spiritual Exercises. I develop first of all the praesupponendum ...