Cosmology and Epistemology: A Comparison between Aristotle's and Ptolemy's Approaches to Geocentrism (original) (raw)
AI-generated Abstract
This research analyzes the contrasting approaches of Aristotle and Ptolemy regarding geocentrism, focusing on their respective epistemologies and the implications for astronomical theories. The paper discusses the foundational concepts from Aristotle's physical astronomy and Ptolemy's mathematical astronomy, highlighting historical debates and the significance of each philosopher's views on cosmology. Key distinctions in their theories are explored to understand underlying assumptions and their impact on the acceptance of fundamental concepts in medieval and Renaissance astronomy.
Related papers
Ptolemy's Cosmology in Greek and Arabic The Background and Legacy of the Planetary Hypotheses
Brepols, 2024
Ptolemy's Almagest (2nd century AD) is the most influential work of ancient and medieval astronomy. This work, however, does not tell us the full story about its author's views of the heavens. After completing the Almagest, Ptolemy turned his attention to a physical investigation of celestial motions. The result is the Planetary Hypotheses, a bold attempt to provide a celestial physics that coheres with the mathematical account of astronomical observations in his Almagest. This book provides the first complete critical edition and English translation of the Arabic version of the Planetary Hypotheses, which is lost for the most part in its original Greek. It furthermore provides an extensive commentary on the whole work, which situates the Planetary Hypotheses within the context of its time and investigates philosophical ideas central to the work. These include the epistemic value of mathematics relative to natural philosophy, and the shape, number, and dynamics of the celestial bodies. The book also investigates the influence of the Planetary Hypotheses on a wide range of medieval Arabic astronomical and philosophical works from the 9th to the 13th century AD. The upshot is to establish the Planetary Hypotheses as a crucial text for understanding the history of philosophy and science from Greek antiquity to the Arabic Middle Ages. see also the other Open Access volumes published by PAL: https://ptolemaeus.badw.de/publications
The Heliocentrism of the Ancient: between Geometry and Physics
Hermeneia, 2019
Geocentrism remained a fundamental characteristic of ancient astronomy , though there were moments in the history of this discipline when they argued for the orbital movement of the Earth around the Sun and even its rotation around its own axis. Practically, at the crossroads between physics and geometry, astronomy rejected a correct thesis in geometric terms, based on seemingly arguable physical theories. In this paper, my goal is to present from a synthetic and dia-chronic perspective several elements of the cosmologic model developed by the Greeks until the time of Aristarchus of Samos, thus highlighting several aspects of physics that made it impossible to accept heliocentrism, explainable in mathematical terms, which he promoted.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Related papers
The Cambridge History of Philosophy of the Scientific Revolution, 2022