Identity and Integration as Conflicting Forces Stimulating the Sunflower Movement and the Kuomintang's Loss in the 2014 Elections (original) (raw)
Related papers
Taiwan: Formation of National Identity and Its Effect on Political Engagement
CCS Visitng Scholars' Working Papers, 2018
This paper analyzes the association between national identity and political affiliation. I argue that the political processes in Taiwan, as well as the outcomes of the local elections in 2018, reflect not the reversal of the liberal democratic ideals in the country but of the support of 'underdogs' and '黨外', as well as the longstanding tradition of anti-establishment political affiliations among Taiwanese people. Using the 1992-2015 Taiwan Social Change Survey, I test the effects of demographic characteristics and of national identity (net of ethnic identity) on the anti-establishment political sentiments vis-à-vis the support of the mainstream political parties. I find that people with dual identity were at the core of the anti-establishment movement in the 90s and 00s. Moreover, they were more likely to be younger, well educated, and have higher earnings. The democratic process with periodic changes in power since the lift of the martial law was, therefore, driven by the electorate who used to identify themselves as both Taiwanese and Chinese in the early years of the democratic rule in Taiwan.
Political Polarization and Gridlock as the Result of an Institutional Imbroglio in Taiwan
Asian Studies
Institutionalist theory argues that fairly permanent economic structures and policy-making arrangements create “institutions” which shape future policy-making and economic performance to a considerable extent (March and Olsen 1989; North 1990; Riker 1982). This perspective suggests that it might be valuable to look for the political institutions that evolved during Taiwan’s development which could have inhibited the country’s adaptability after the mid-1990s. From this perspective, Taiwan’s current institutional imbroglio results from a combination of a complex and somewhat indeterminate constitutional system, a long-time election system that contained some perverse incentives, and its long era of authoritarian rule. This paper, hence, seeks to provide an “institutionalist” explanation for the polarization and gridlock in Taiwan’s politics in the early 21st century.
Norms and Institutions in the Shaping of Identity and Governance: Mainland China and Taiwan in the Regional Environment, 2017
Wen-cheng Lin and Emile Kok-Kheng Yeoh (special issue editors) (2017), Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: An International Journal (CCPS), Vol. 3, No. 1, April/May 2017 (Special Issue – Norms and Institutions in the Shaping of Identity and Governance: Mainland China and Taiwan in the Regional Environment), pp. 1-521 (521 pp. + xviii). [Scopus] http://rpb115.nsysu.edu.tw/p/404-1131-170663.php?Lang=en http://rpb115.nsysu.edu.tw/var/file/131/1131/img/2374/CCPS-V3N1-full-issue.pdf https://www.dropbox.com/s/dj0vs3sfnq6gxj2/CCPS-V3N1-full-issue.pdf