Is English Academic Writing as Simple as Using Translation Tool?Error Analysis on Students' Abstract (original) (raw)
Related papers
Analysis of the Tertiary Students’ English Writing Errors; What Errors Are and What Levels Are
EXPOSURE : JURNAL PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS
Writing, the language skill three, is a part of the productive skill of the four intergrated language skills. Error Analysis as the language learning approach to study about the problematic English written product. It is the mostly-complecated skill than the others. This current study aims at analyzing the grammatical errors made of and investigating the levels of English grammatical errors produced. This study was carried out by using a descriptive quantitative research method by using a test, a guided writing test by letting the students write the patterned texts by answering the questions given, as the instrument to obtain the data on the error types made and the levels of English grammatical errors produced. This study shows that the non-syntactical errors found are spellings (44%), punctuations (19%), Capitalizations LCL (14%), and the selection of words (23%). Whereas the syntactical errors are the use of articles (5.5%), parts of speech (8%), subject-verbs agreement (11%), us...
An Analysis of Errors in English Writing: A Case Study the Third Semester Students of UBSI
2021
The objectives of this research are to know the errors in the third semester students’ writing of Bina Sarana Informatika University and the most frequent error. It is concerned to the grammatical and semantic and substance errors. The data is analyzed by using James’ theory in (Mungungu, 2010). The findings show that errors done by the students are spelling 50.9%, fragment 15.7%, punctuation 9.8%, adjective 3%, subject- verb agreement 3.9%, preposition 3.9%, capitalization 3.9%, tenses 2%, verb 2%, literal translation 2%. It can be concluded that the most frequent error is spelling. It because the students missed a letter, added more letter in a word, and exchange the letter. While In grammatical category, the most frequent error is fragment. It is because the most students do not put a subject in a sentence.
English Language Teaching for EFL Learners, 2019
This research aims to analyze in depth the use of diction error, subject and predicate, and the cause of the error on students of English Education in State University of Jakarta. The research is a qualitative study using descriptive methods. The Instrument of this research is 50 students of third semester essay at the end of the task of writing an academic course of the academic year 2012/2013. The results of this research showed the majority of student errors occurred in the category of diction. Diction ranks first in the percentage of error as much as 63%, followed by subject and verb agreement 37%, and the cause of the error is due to the influence of the first language, translation, and carelessness
Correcting grammatical errors in university-level foreign language students’ written work
This study examined the grammar errors in written work made by 30 freshman students in the English Language Teaching Department at a Turkish university. The students were divided into two groups (each consisting of 15 students), with one group at a higher level than the other, according to the results of their proficiency exam. The students' written work was marked and the grammar errors were noted down. An analysis of the errors revealed the following error types: plurality, articles, subject-verb agreement, word order, pronouns, prepositions, part of speech, auxiliaries, negation, tense agreement and lexis. Of these, most errors were made overall with parts of speech, plurality, subject-verb agreement, prepositions and articles. Although, as might have been predicted, the students in the lower group made more errors (the average of 3.5) than those in the higher group (the average of 2.8), the higher level students actually made more errors than lower level students for some errors types (parts of speech and lexis). This phenomenon might be attributed to the more complicated language being attempted by the higher level students, which presents a higher risk of error. Implications for the teaching and learning situation are discussed and suggestions are made for further research.
Journal of Education and Practice, 2019
The purpose of this study was to explore and analyze the common errors of second year English department students in writing paragraph with reference to Gilgel Beles CTE. The students wrote paragraphs (about causes of environmental pollution) with the range of 150 to 200 words approximately. They also completed the questionnaires that were adapted from Korbel (2001) regarding their views toward writing skills. The instructors completed the questionnaire and replied for opened-ended question. The study was a survey method using 4-point Likert Scale questionnaire. Systematic sampling technique was implemented to select 10 students in each section from the total population of 196 students. Though the total numbers of the students were 196, only 50 students had responded to the questionnaire. Among 50 sample sizes, only forty-five students completed the questionnaire formally. Two students completed the questionnaire wrongly whereas three students were absent during data gathering. Comprehensive (available) sampling technique was used to select instructors. Among the seven English instructors, six instructors completed the questionnaire formally and returned to the researcher. This study employed a mixed method design which includes both quantitative and qualitative research analysis methods. In general, there were different types of errors; grammatical errors in particular, were made by the students. These were passive voice, verb form, subject-verb agreement, word order, prepositions, articles, plurality and auxiliaries. Especially, words spelling and the lack of sense of sentences/paragraphs/ are the most problems. This incomprehensibility of grammar rules has negative effect on student compositions. After analyzing students' and teachers' questionnaire, it has been found out that the students made grammatical errors due to many reasons: the lack of practices daily, lack of motivation, problem of teaching methods, lack of writing activities, teachers escape writing lesson, school text book is not conducive (it focuses more on speaking) and the lack of opportunities to practice writing skills.
In a foreign language situation “errors” explain the learner’s inability to use appropriate grammatical structures, semantic categories and other linguistic units. This paper deals with “errors” in foreign language writing of the grade VIII students in order to explore why and what sort of errors they commit in writing. One hundred and twenty respondents from twelve non-government schools of Dhaka city were involved to render the errors with the association of writing composition test as well as focused group discussion. Congregated data is analyzed both in the quantitative and qualitative manner that reveals the respondents mostly undergo the errors of tense, spelling, article, subject-verb agreement, preposition and miscellaneous errors. The findings indicate the respondents’ competence of writing English is quite low due to poor grammar knowledge of target language, interference from mother language and limited vocabulary size.
Analysis of Higher Education Students’ Errors in English Writing Tasks
Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 2020
The aim of this study is to analyse the errors of higher education students in English writing tasks. In the study, the paragraphs in the exam papers of 57 preparatory class students, studying at a state university in Turkey in 2017-2018 academic year, were analysed. The study was conducted using qualitative research method. Case study was used in the research. Document analysis was used to collect data. The collected data were analysed in line with Surface Strategy Taxonomy and errors were identified and classified. As a result of the error analysis process, it was observed that the students made a total of 381 errors on 57 exam papers; 192 of them were misformation errors, 113 were omission errors, 65 were addition errors and only 11 were misordering errors. Misformation was the most frequent error among the students with a percentage of 50.39. In addition, the percentage of omission errors was 29.66%, that of addition errors was 17.06% and misordering errors was 2.89%. The profes...
Journal of Education and Practice, 2018
The present study focuses on the most common syntactic errors which Arabic speaking learners in Preparatory Year, Jazan University (Saudi Arabia) face in learning English as a foreign language. The results of this study reveal that the most common syntactic errors made by the learners are in sentence structure; subject verb agreement, tense, auxiliary verb, number, use of conjunction, preposition, article, etc. Many students in this study were categorized as slow learners who were not even aware of the importance of writing skill. Non-seriousness and less concentration of learners result errors and mistakes in their writing. In addition to that, the errors were hypothetically associated to the transfer of mother tongue and over generalization. In the Arab context, writing is not an easy task; it is, indeed, a challenging job for the teacher. Therefore, traditional methodologies do not help. Unless the teachers create interest about writing skill in the minds of the learners, the des...
Research and Innovation in Language Learning
The result section is an essential part of the thesis to summarize information about research findings. Presenting research findings in terms of clear and concise writing is vital for the English students of the higher education. To this, students should know the linguistic aspects of writing. Previous research shows that a lot of research has been carried out regarding grammatical issues in writing, but little research has been done on deep grammar issues in writing the result section of the thesis. Thus, this study aims to analyze the grammatical issues in student-researchers’ thesis. Data were officially collected from the reading room of the faculty of state university in Medan. The data were analyzed according to Bourke & Holbrook's (1992) theory. The results show student-researchers are still struggling to use verb-form issues, nouns, and tenses. At last, word form remains the most dominant issues of errors.
Analysis of Syntactical Errors and Mistakes in Students’ Writing
RETAIN, 2018
Written language is difficult for some people especially some learners who learn English as foreign language, because it somehow has a complicated syntactical form that is hard to be understood. Thus, it causes error and mistake. Commonly, error occurs because learners do not realize that they made error and it is the gaps in learners knowledge of the target language especially English. In particular, the purpose of this research is to describe kinds of syntactical error and mistake found in students' writing composition, namely in paragraph writing class of university students in second semester. Dealing with the research questions and objectives of the study in the first chapter, the data gained are going to be analyzed qualitatively. The data of the study were obtained from students' errors and mistakes. In this study, the data were obtained from the form of words, phrases, and sentences found in the students' writing composition. The source data were collected through the students' writing composition. Based on the result, it can be seen that there are five types of syntactical errors and mistakes that made by students, those are: word order, omitted word, unnecessary word, run-on sentence, and fragments. In this result, most of the students made an error since they did not know to answer the correct one.