Why Social Networks are Overrated : Downsides of the Commensuration that Underlies Social Network Analysis 1 (original) (raw)
Related papers
Springer eBooks, 2021
Today, social networks analysis has become a cross-disciplinary subject with applications in diverse fields of social and economic life. Different network designs provide different opportunities to communicate, to receive information and to create different structures of cultural capital. Network analysis explores modes and contents of exchanges between different agents when symbols, emotions or goods and services are exchanged. The message of the article is that social network analysis provides a tool to foster the understanding of social dynamics, which enhances recent debate on a micro-macro gap and on limitations of the cognitive and explanatory potential of economics.
Reflections on a Critical Sociology of Networks
Social life is rife with networks of any kind. Nowadays, sociological concerns for networks, relations, associations, processes, mobilities, and flows are intensive and em-blematic. This reflection takes " networks " and their multiple products as starting points for a new sociological imagination. It hence outlines a set of current theoretical and methodologi-cal issues for approaching the wide and diverse field of the sociology of networks in a critical manner, beginning from the analytical distinction between the critical and the normative-functionalist sociology of networks. The paper concludes with reference to contemporary digital society and the critical use of network data (Big Data), that is, ever-larger quantities of information generated by human communicative interactions in social networking platforms and other web activities.
2014: Social network analysis and critical realism
Social network analysis (SNA) is an increasingly popular approach that provides researchers with highly developed tools to map and analyze complexes of social relations. Although a number of network scholars have explicated the assumptions that underpin SNA, the approach has yet to be discussed in relation to established philosophies of science. This article argues that there is a tension between applied and methods-oriented SNA studies, on the one hand, and those addressing the social-theoretical nature and implications of networks, on the other. The former, in many cases, exhibits positivist tendencies, whereas the latter incorporate a number of assumptions that are directly compatible with core critical realist views on the nature of social reality and knowledge. This article suggests that SNA may be detached from positivist social science and come to constitute a valuable instrument in the critical realist toolbox.
An Actor-Network Approach to the 2007-2008 Financial Crisis
In this paper, I employ Actor-Network Theory (ANT) in order to provide an account of the 2007 financial crisis. I do this with the intention of preserving the ontological heterogeneity amongst the elements involved in its happening. I will begin with capitalism’s longue durée, particularly focusing on the structural imperative for endless accumulation and its role in facilitating the latest financialization phase in the world-system. I will then briefly give evidence for this financialization and sketch its geo-political geography and historicity. Narrowing in on the US, I will then illustrate the ways in which this financialization contributed to changing financial ecologies, financial innovations, and de-regulatory legislation, all of which combined to produce the housing bubble. From there, I will turn to a meso-level example to show how the macro-structural transformations I will have illustrated have contributed to racially discriminatory mortgage-lending practices, reconceptualizing those practices through a Marxian lens. Finally, I will delve into the technological, organizational, and cultural actants involved in the production of the globally transmitted risk-cultures that were important elements of the financial crisis.
Social Crises: Signatures of Complexity in a Fast-Growing Economy
Complexity, 2018
Social systems are always exposed to critical processes in which their organization, or part of it, is questioned by the society that demands solutions through different critical saliences. The traditional approach to such social crises has mainly focused on their anticipation and management, implying that the focus is on trying to deal with crises once they occur, rather than delving in their essential characteristics that seemingly depend on the adaptive nature of the system and the increase in its internal complexity. To address this issue, we propose a dual approach that utilizes both qualitative (documentary analysis) and quantitative methods (online social network analysis) in order to delve into the relationship between the complexity of the social system, its adaptation, and critical episodes. Our analysis shows how an explosive economic growth affects a social system, increasing its complexity. This complexity produces different demands from the system itself. These demands...
Friedman. 2005. The Wealth and Poverty of Networks.
At A Distance: Precursors to Internet Art and Activism, 2005
There is no question that networks have become a central focus and conceptual metaphor of activity in the late twentieth century. The interesting question is why this is so, and why it has happened now. In many senses, networks have become typical, even emblematic, of many kinds of processes in the world. These processes are often hailed as a step toward democracy, equality of opportunity, access to resources, and appropriate governance of the world’s resources. All of these characterizations are reasonable. Nevertheless, networks offer no simple solutions to the world’s problems. In the course of solving some problems, networks introduce challenges and problems of their own. The network society is an overlay wrapped around different kinds of societies and cultures, linking them and connecting them. The network society reshapes older societies, sometimes destroying them.
Formalist and Relationalist Theory in Social Network Analysis
Social network research is widely considered atheoretical. In contrast, in this article I argue that network analysis often mixes two distinct theoretical frameworks, creating a logically inconsistent foundation. Relationalism rejects essentialism and a priori categories and insists upon the intersubjectivity of experience and meaning as well as the importance of the content of interactions and their historical setting. Formalism is based on a structuralist interpretation of the theoretical works of Georg Simmel. Simmel laid out a neo-Kantian program of identifying a priori categories of relational types and patterns that operate independently of cultural content or historical setting. Formalism and relationalism are internally consistent theoretical perspectives, but there are tensions between them. To pave the way for stronger middle-range theoretical development, I disaggregate the two approaches and highlight the contradictions that must be addressed or resolved for the construction of any general and inclusive theory.