Patterns of recruitment of academic leaders to Australian universities and implications for the future of higher education (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Attractiveness of the Australian Academic Profession: A comparative analysis Research Briefing
This briefing provides an analysis of challenges facing the sustainability and development of the academic workforce in Australia. It draws together insights from national statistics collections and a number of recent studies, sheds light on current characteristics of the academic profession, and identifies key problem areas. From a review of the evidence, we argue that now is the time for both policy action at the national and institutional level to address these problems, and for further research that can inform workforce planning and development in the years to come.
Universities and the aging academic workforce : where is the leadership?
2011
Universities in Western developed countries are on the cusp of a human resource crisis with 40-60% of academics in OECD countries older than 55 years of age. This comes at a time when students numbers and ongoing demand for higher education are high but competitive funding from national governments coupled with managerialist and corporatist governance have kept the academic workforce lean. This paper presents findings from an Australian case study of university management, policy and leadership in relation to their academic staff. The findings from interviews with senior management in some universities show contradictory, ambivalent, even discriminatory attitudes toward older academics. Documentary analysis reveals an institutional human resource management policy vacuum with a dearth of strategies and ideas despite the predicted staffing crisis in Western countries. There is a disconnect between the senior and middle management levels within universities with short term ever-changing budgetary instability to faculties and departments. Senior management prevaricates between viewing its academic workforce as professionals or employees. It is argued that these tensions are exacerbated in a competitive performance-based government funding climate and that senior leadership struggles between the values of the traditional collegial governance structures and the corporate governance introduced during the 1990s.
A Competency-Based Approach to Recruiting and Developing Academic Leaders – A Review
2016
The definition of leadership in academia is very similar to the one in business settings: inspiring others, being a role model, being selfaware and self-reflective as well as being decisive, visionary, planning ahead and handling the finances. In summary leadership is described as the ability “to enable the success of other people”. Given the fact that institutions of higher learning are being challenged as never before by many forces: the tough and uncertain economic climate, profound pressure in funding such as “# fees must fall” in South Africa, and unprecedented global competition for the best and brightest students and staff, one would assume that the rigorous processes used in recruiting business leaders would similarly be adopted by institutions of higher learning to recruit and develop their leaders. However, a review of recruitment of academic leaders determined that most universities recruit their academic leaders using the traditional approach based on seniority on the ac...
The attractiveness of the Australian academic profession : a comparative analysis
2009
This briefing provides an analysis of challenges facing the sustainability and development of the academic workforce in Australia. It draws together insights from national statistics collections and a number of recent studies, sheds light on current characteristics of the academic profession, and identifies key problem areas. From a review of the evidence, we argue that now is the time for both policy action at the national and institutional level to address these problems, and for further research that can inform workforce planning and development in the years to come.
Change and Continuity in the Appointment of Second Tier University Managers
2011
The modern university is a multi-million pound enterprise, operating in a highly competitive global market place and an increasingly challenging economic environment. The quality of university management – especially as executive team level – has thus never been more important and it follows that appointing the best candidates is essential. This study of university top team recruitment practice has two research components, or phases. The first identifies the extent to which pre-1992 universities are moving from an internal, fixed-term appointment process for their second tier managers – that is, Deputy and Pro Vice-chancellors – to one of external advertisement. The second is a census of current second tier managers. The picture that emerges is one of change and continuity. Pre-1992 institutions are fairly evenly divided across different institutional types and affiliations into those that have changed their recruitment practice and those that have not. The number of second tier managers continues to rise and their remit widen to include portfolios outside traditional academic areas. Moreover, there is evidence of increasing role differentiation between DVCs and PVCs and between ‘policy’ and ‘executive’ PVCs. The recruitment pattern remains remarkably constant, however. Even where an external appointment process has been adopted, the profile of second tier managers remains largely the same: they are overwhelmingly male professors from UK universities. This is because, although the nature and complexity of the job has changed, the presumption that only senior academics are appointable has not. At a conceptual level, the increase in the number and executive power of academic managers appears somewhat at odds with the prevailing discourse of managerialism in universities, which bemoans the rise of “management” and diminution in status of the academic. Are today’s academic managers the agents of managerialism or HE’s unique means of defending against it? Either way, the issue warrants further investigation.
Bureaucratic, Professional and Managerial Power in University Tenure Track Recruitment
Peer review in an Era of Evaluation, 2022
In this chapter, our interest lies in analysing the different powers in recruitment and, particularly, how they are manifested in the new tenure track model in technical fields in Finland. Traditionally, recruitment in higher education has mostly relied on the bureaucratic application of processes and on academics, representing professional power, evaluating academic merit. The new university legislation, granting universities more autonomy in recruiting, has allowed the development of increasingly strategic recruitment models. The novel tenure track recruitment criteria exceed traditional notions of individual merits to include assessments of the strategic visions of universities and departments. We see the use of the tenure track model as a shift both in the recruitment for identity building related to the technical university’s strategy and as a shift in using more managerial power in recruitment. We use a case study approach where we look at recruitment in a similar field in two...
Preparing and Finding Leaders for Colleges and Universities: An Updated View from Search Firms
Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 2017
Kieffer. She specializes in senior executive searches for colleges, universities, and other not-for-profit organizations. She has led over 150 searches for presidents, vice presidents, and deans. Her book, Searching for Higher Education Leadership: Advice for Candidates and Search Committees (2009), was published in the ACE Series on Higher Education by Rowman & Littlefield. Her columns for the Chronicle of Higher Education are archived in the Advice section of The Chronicle online.
2007
This is an analytical paper that argues for a more enlightened approach to management and leadership practices in Australian universities. The central tenet is that the classical 'command and control' mindset-so prevalent in Australian institutions-is no longer relevant in the turbulent and dynamic organizational environment confronting universities. I argue that a more inclusive and collaborative decision-making process that reconceptualises and reframes the more 'traditional' management and leadership mindset would better serve a contemporary university. I contend that if organizations such as universities are to reap effective organizational benefits from the existing high levels of knowledge/intellectual human resources capital-via the ability to 'tap into' the large staff pool of 'creativity and intelligence' that still marks a university as special in this cognitive regardthen strategic and operational decision-making should not remain the exclusive domain of specific individuals or very small elite groups at the senior management level.