Subsidiarity, Human Rights and Judicial Activism: The Role of Courts (en M. Dybowski y R. García Pérez (eds.), Globalization of Law. The Role of Human Dignity, Thomson-Reuters Aranzadi, Cizur Menor, 2018, pp. 89-112) (original) (raw)
Related papers
JURISDICTIONAL ACTIVITY AND THE ENFORCEMENT OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND GUARANTEES: JUDICIALIZATION, ACTIVISM AND JUDICIAL PASSIVISM (Atena Editora), 2024
Judicialization and judicial activism are issues raised quite frequently in legal circles, with little attention paid to judicial passivism. There is even confusion regarding concepts. The point of intersection between these concepts lies in the fact that there is a counter-majoritarian difficulty in the Judiciary, which is not made up of representatives elected by the people, and this Branch often has the last word on the law. The present work aims to conceptualize and present the positive and negative aspects of judicialization, activism and judicial passivism, in the light of academic literature. Starting from the premise that the Democratic Rule of Law can only be understood as such with the enforcement of fundamental rights, the parameters for self-restraint of the Judiciary are presented. Whenever this is required, in case of omission of other powers, the aim is to overcome the counter-majoritarian difficulty, with the main parameters being the defense of vulnerable minorities and the maintenance of the necessary assumptions for the functioning of democracy.
2022
This article aims to study the challenges to the implementation of the universalism of human rights, based on the reaction of States that are opposed to the control of the conventionality of the supranational matrix carried out by international bodies such as the European Court of Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. This reaction led to the reworking of the subsidiarity of the international jurisdiction of human rights, which gains a substantive facet. The main delineations of the theory of the national margin of appreciation and the rule of the prohibition to act as a fourth instance will be studied. As a conclusion, the risk faced by the universalism of human rights is exposed by the unbridled adoption of these two types of material subsidiarity of the international jurisdiction of human rights.
THE JUDICIAL ACTIVISM AND ITS VALIDITY WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE DEMOCRATIC STATE OF LAW
Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito, 2021
The actual article aims to analyze the validity of judicial activism within the scope of the Democratic State of Law under the bias of the Systems Theory. For that purpose, the following aspects will be investigated: the distinction between society, system, communication, programming and coding; the luhmannian theory and its systems; the evolution of systems and the and the communicative forms of propagation; the time according to Luhmann, the conception of a systemic unity and the existence of autonomous branches of the law, and the distinction between judicial activism, motivated free conviction of the judge and judicial pro-activity and the risk to the Democratic State of Law in the face of an eventual dictatorship of the judiciary. In order to obtain the results intended by this research, the method of approach to be followed will be the empirico-dialectic, making use of a bibliographic and legislative research, having as a background a reference system based on the linguistic turnaround, represented by the Logical Semantic Constructivism taken from Paulo de Barros Carvalho. In conclusion, it is demonstrated that judicial activism does not have validity within the Democratic State of Law, if it is based on the theoretical framework adopted here.
2021
The actual article aims to analyze the validity of judicial activism within the scope of the Democratic State of Law under the bias of the Systems Theory. For that purpose, the following aspects will be investigated: the distinction between society, system, communication, programming and coding; the luhmannian theory and its systems; the evolution of systems and the and the communicative forms of propagation; the time according to Luhmann, the conception of a systemic unity and the existence of autonomous branches of the law, and the distinction between judicial activism, motivated free conviction of the judge and judicial pro-activity and the risk to the Democratic State of Law in the face of an eventual dictatorship of the judiciary. In order to obtain the results intended by this research, the method of approach to be followed will be the empirico-dialectic, making use of a bibliographic and legislative research, having as a background a reference system based on the linguistic t...
CONSTITUTIONAL REASON AND THE HUMAN RIGHTS NORMATIVITY
1 Introduction 2 Of constitutional judgments and propositions 3 Human rights and constitutional deontics 4 Conclusion References. ABSTRACT: In this article, we developed some considerations about the numerous problems that involve the constitutional legal norm as a binding structure of mandatory, prohibitive and permissive norms of a jusfundamental nature, these species integrated in statements and textualities that configure the Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil of 1988, an indispensable instrument for the affirmation of several fundamental values inherent to human rights, the Greater Law that can receive the most diverse hermeneutic treatments. Keywords: legal reason. human rights. normativity. human rights standards. interpretation. ABSTRACT: In this article we develop some considerations about several issues involving constitutional law with deontic nature of jusfundamental obligations, prohibitions and permissions distributed in contitutional text concerning 1988 Brazilian Constitution, indispensable instrument asserting numerous human rights, able to receive plural hermeneutical interpretations.
On the definition, Content, and Essence of the Term “human rights”
Krytyka Prawa, 2022
The ambiguity of understanding and use of the term "human rights" reduces the effectiveness of the law-making and law enforcement activities of state and international bodies, creates negative conditions for the formation of the unified worldview and legal position of future lawyers and representatives of other humanities. This article aims to define, formulate the content and describe the legal essence of the term "human rights," and to substantiate the thesis about the harmfulness of the legal science, law-making and law enforcement use of this term with different meanings. The leading method of research is the method of analysis, which allows one to study the subject, imaginatively dividing it into constituent elements, and to consider each of the selected elements separately within a single whole. This article presents the argumentation of the need for a single wording, understand
Beyond the dominant discourse of human rights Além do discurso dominante dos direitos humanos
2016
It promotes a critical reflection on the theoretical foundations of the dominant discourse of human rights, from a relativistic role of European Modernity seeking afford to see ideas, struggles, thoughts and peripheral stories as a first step to reshape this discourse whose effectiveness remains questioned, in practice. It assumes that the theoretical foundations of the dominant discourse of human rights has been the subject of extensive research, which, at first, might suggest that the discussion on this subject was already exhausted and therefore does not deserve greater contributions. These conceptions about the human rights foundations, usually rest in some incontrovertible premises. This discourse, for reasons that will be presented, was designed as a hegemonic discourse. The theoretical reference counter-hegemonic is based on Makau Mutua and Sousa Santos’ thinking. The general objective of the authors is to generate a critical reflection of this dominant conception of human ri...
This article aims to discuss the possibility of constitutional changes coming from the International Human Rights Law, both by virtue of decisions issued in the International Courts when the State has expressed adhesion, as by the international norms freely covenanted in the scenario of the international society, ratifying and internalizing them. There is a legal duty to conform internal norms to international standards for the protection of human rights, and such a duty can be carried out through constitutional change or through direct amendment of legal texts, including the constitutional text. For this purpose, what is proposed here is the adoption of a universalist and supranormative vision of human rights, aided by the control of conventionality of norms and by the abandonment of the classical view of sovereignty.
Features Of Fundamental Rights In The Context Of The Philosophy Of Law
WISDOM, 2020
The article explores the notion and peculiarities of fundamental rights of the individual in the modern, legal state. In the given research the author implements versatile, holistic, systematical (methodical) analysis of content and distinguishing features of the structural element of the concept “legal status of the individual”. Therefore, the theoretical and practical research of problems of development of fundamental human rights, gives an opportunity to find new solutions in protections of relations concerning the individual's legal status. This study is also focusing on various approaches of well-known jurists on the essence, content and legislative consolidation of the fundamental rights of the individual. Summering up the results of explored issues, we concluded, that in recent decades, the philosophy of law (with the theory of state and law) took under its active protection and guardianship man with his rights, freedoms and legitimate interests, and which have ceased to ...