Protection of Public Interests in the Process of the Indonesian Proprietary (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Bankruptcy Legal Politics in Indonesia based on Justice Value
Jurnal Akta, 2022
The purpose of this study is to find out and analyze the politics of bankruptcy law in Indonesia based on Justice Value, and the problems that occur in its application. The approach method in this study uses a normative juridical approach. The application of legal politics with the concept of justice in the settlement of bankruptcy cases can be interpreted as a condition where the debtor stops paying his debts that have matured so that by the decision of the Commercial Court his assets are declared as general confiscation to be sold by the curator and distributed to his creditors in a fair and balanced manner according to the proportion with the supervision of the supervisory judge. The confiscation is carried out to ensure the interests of all creditors and prevent executions that are requested by individual creditors. Bankruptcy only concerns the general confiscation of the assets of the bankrupt debtor, excluding civil rights outside of property law, civil rights, public rights and social rights in social life in society.
Legal Protection of Solvent Companies from Bankruptcy Abuse in Indonesian Legal System
Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies
In bankruptcy legal system in Indonesia, the court can issue bankruptcy verdict without assess a company’s solvency condition, whether the company is solvent or insolvent. The provision of this law is very prone to be misused by creditors with bad faith. Insolvency test is able to protect debtors and to prevent the abuse of bankruptcy by malice creditors. This paper aims to analyze the legal protection of solvent companies from bankruptcy abuse in Indonesian legal system. By using normative and juridical approach, the results showed that the insolvency test can be included in the future amendment of Indonesian bankruptcy law. The implementation of insolvency test therefore is not administered outside the bankruptcy proceedings, but still in the respective bankruptcy proceedings. Insolvency test can be implemented by judges based on convincing evidences such as money report made by registered Public Accountant Office. A debtor, with bad faith, should not be eligible to get protection...
Ruling due to Bankruptcy Assets Debtors Beyond Areas in Indonesia
Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal, 2021
The purpose of this study is to examine the consequences of bankruptcy decisions on debtor assets outside the territory of Indonesia and to see the extent to which the bankruptcy law provides protection to creditors from debtors whose assets are located outside the territory of Indonesia. This is Normative legal Research with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach and a comparative approach. The results and discussion concluded that the bankruptcy decision handed down by the Commercial Court in Indonesia could have an impact on the debtor’s assets outside the territory of Indonesia in accordance with Article 21 of the Bankruptcy Law. The issue of execution is hindered by the principle of territoriality from other countries. The bankruptcy law has not fully provided legal protection for creditors if the debtor has assets outside the territory of Indonesia, as a way for curators to carry out private selling. Indonesia should adopt the Uncitral Model Law on cross-border insolvency...
Lex Scientia Law Review, 2021
The high number of bankruptcies in Indonesia, which increased to 54% in the pandemic era, had negative impacts on the economic ecosystem in Indonesia. A regulation is needed that can reduce the number of bankruptcies, in which the moratorium of Act 37/2004 is a discourse that will be predicted as the main solution. The moratorium of Act 37/2004 with its weaknesses has been rejected by many parties, so this research will offer a more appropriate alternative solution in the form of setting temporary measures on bankruptcy. This study seeks to describe the urgency and prospects of the presence of temporary measures on bankruptcy in Indonesia and recommend the regulation and implementation of temporary measures on bankruptcy in Indonesia. This legal research is normative legal research with data obtained from library research analyzed descriptive-qualitatively. The results of the study indicate that the moratorium of Act 37/2004 does not provide fair benefits for debtors and creditors i...
2020
The problem discussed in this study involves is that there is yet to be a law protection for Multiple or Separate-Editor in case if company is declared bankrupt and is unable to pay its debts as a whole that could reflect Justice Value. The method of research used in this research is juridical-empirical where the research type is qualitative research with a sociological juridical approach (Socio-Legal Approach). The results of this study indicate that the position of the separate-creditors in the company bankruptcy currently has a priority in obtaining repayment of their accounts. Manpower legal protection in the event of a debtor who has been declared bankrupt before and after the Constitutional Court decision No. 67 / PUU-XI / 2013 are as follows: prior to the Constitutional Court decision it was assumed that labor wages remained under separate-creditors, taxes, auction fees, and curator fees and were deemed not to contradict Article 28D paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of the Indo...
Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies
The objectives of this research are to identify and assess the granting of discharge as of debt in the bankruptcy law in Indonesia and legal policy regarding granting status of fresh start to individual debtors, which are in a good faith and is not able, after termination of bankruptcy, in order to develop bankruptcy law in Indonesia. The analysis is directed to explain the legal policy on granting status of fresh start to the individual bankrupt debtor in order to develop the Bankruptcy Law in Indonesia. Bankruptcy was originally conceived as a punishment for an act that is considered a criminal conduct because of the debtors’ bad faith to avoid debt. Modern bankruptcy law is aimed as an exit from financial distress. The bankruptcy law system in Indonesia adheres to a principle of “debt collective” which comes in the form of a general seizure over the debtor’s bankruptcy assets as collateral for debts repayment. This study offers an novelty in that bankruptcy law in Indonesia does ...
Edunity : Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan
The bankruptcy case of PT Aliga Internasional Pratama is proof of the dualism of the position of criminal confiscation over general confiscation in the bankruptcy estate. Based on the decision of the Commercial Court at the Central Jakarta District Court, PT. Aliga International Pratama has been legally declared bankrupt with all the legal consequences. Whereas as of the date of the bankruptcy decision, all assets of PT. Aliga is in a state of general confiscation, and the authority to control and manage all of their asset rests with the Curator Team. However, 2 buildings which are bankrupt assets, namely The Aliga Hotel and factory/office buildings, have been confiscated by the Criminal Investigation Police Investigators (Bareskrim Polri).The research method in this paper is descriptive qualitative, namely the legal material obtained is presented descriptively and analyzed qualitatively. The results showed that, analyzed using the theory of justice according to Thomas Aquinas and t...
Implementation of the Doctrine of the Business Judgment Rule on Bankruptcy Law in Indonesia
Yuridika, 2019
One of the mechanisms that can be taken in resolving accounts payable to a limited liability company in bankruptcy. In the case of bankruptcy due to mistakes made personally by the Board of Directors and the Board of Commissioners, they must be responsible for debts held by limited liability companies. The company law regulates the way for the Board of Directors and Board of Commissioners to avoid liability for losses suffered by the company, through the doctrine of the Business Judgment Rule (BJR). In practice, the application of the BJR doctrine in bankruptcy law is characterized by differences in interpretation between law enforcers. Differences in interpretation occur because there is no clear provision in the Republic of Indonesia Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Delay of Obligations to Pay Debt (Law No. 37/2004) which limits the filing of bankruptcy applications to the personal Directors and Board of Commissioners. The research in this article is carried out by ...