Memory, History, and Japanese Atrocities (original) (raw)
Related papers
A paper presented ISA Asia-Pacific Confrence, 25-28 June 2016, City University of Hong Kong The paper proposes to apply the theory of multiple modernities to the study of national identity examining various discourses of modernity that were in circulation in the Japanese empire. As proposed by Shmuel N Eisenstadt, the theory of moderenities is an expression of attitudes to social scientific understanding of the world: conventional theories of modernity and modernisation need to be challenged for their often implicit western-centricity in that all societies in the world are expected to converge on the European model. Apart from a focused critique of the conventional theories’ western-centricity and the suggestion that the analytical focus should be place on human agency, the theory of multiple modernities is rather undefined. However with these two points, it still helps develop new research on identities, and the case of East Asia serves as an ideal context in which identity is investigated from a fresh angle. Set in this broad framework, the paper investigates discourses of modernity that were in circulation in the Japanese empire. As it is well known, intellectuals of wartime Japan were deeply engaged with the question of modernity, and the idea such as the East Asian Community and the event such as the ‘Overcoming Modernity’ symposium of 1942 were expression of their endeavour. These were, needless to say, the ruler’s hegemonic idea but there is some evidence some intellectuals in colonised Korea and Taiwan took them up as the tool of subversion of Japanese imperial rule as well as of consolidating national unity. Drawing mainly from secondary literature on colonial intellectuals in the Japanese Empire, the paper sheds light on the complex interaction among different ideas framed in the modernity discourse which reflect conscious exercise of agency.
Pure Spirits: Imperial Japanese Justice and Right-Wing Terrorists, 1878–1936
Why was the legal system in 1930s Japan so friendly to right-wing offenders, even when they tried to assassinate leading statesmen and generals? The answer is intertwined with a cultural narrative defined here as " subjectivism " , that assigned vital importance to a crim-inal's subjective state of mind when evaluating his or her transgressions. Though influenced by Western thought, this narrative was indigenous to Japan. It originated in the late Edo Period, shortly prior to the establishment of the Meiji State in 1868, under specific historical circumstances and was later reinforced by the policy of the early Meiji State. Consequently, it pervaded education, politics and popular discourse alike, in the civilian sphere and even more so in the army. Until the early 1920s, this trend had a relatively modest influence on the Japanese justice system. It then began to gain traction in military courts dealing with political crimes of army personnel. From 1932 it influenced civilian courts as well, though civilian judges were relatively more reluctant to accept it than their military peers. After a peak in the mid-1930s, it again receded into the background, following the abortive coup d'état of February 26, 1936.
Bushidō and the Legacy of “Samurai Values” in Contemporary Japan
Asian Studies, 2018
Though difficult to define as a clear set of moral precepts, aspects of so-called “samurai values”, the combination of orally-transmitted Confucian and Buddhist lore to which Nitobe Inazō refers in his Bushido, can clearly be discerned in Japanese society today. As evidence for the influence of “samurai values”, I have provided examples from two fields with which I am personally familiar: journalism and education. Although in recent years several academic works have exposed historical anomalies in widely-held beliefs about actual samurai behaviour, I argue that the effectiveness of ideologies does not depend on historical accuracy. For example, justification for the right of newspapers to criticise governments in Japan does not stem from inalienable rights originating with European Enlightenment philosophers. Instead, it is linked to the view that the former samurai who in the 1870s became Japan’s first news reporters could be trusted intermediaries between the government and the pe...
The Western Image of the Japanese Spirit and Okakura Yoshisaburo's The Japanese Spirit
2011
During the national crisis brought on by the Russo-Japanese War, on which the fate of Imperial Japan depended, the Imperial armies revealed to the world their bravery and orderly conduct through a succession of great victories over Russia. Their deeds and behavior on the battlefield led to considerable speculation as to the reasons behind the Japanese moral force. For example, an editorial Question of Japanese Morality was carried in The Times on October 3, 1904, and immediately after, The Soul of a Nation was published the next day, in the same newspaper. The latter, in particular, expressed considerable curiosity regarding the conduct of the Japanese:
The “Japan Is Great!” Boom, Historical Revisionism, and the Government
The Asia-Pacific Journal, Japan Focus, 2017
As the Tokyo Shimbun reported in its recent article, the expression “Japan Is Great!” and a distinctive nationalistic sentiment associated with it flood the mass media in Japan today. Journalists and television personalities praise Japan ad nauseam. Hayakawa Tadanori is an editor and writer who has extensively covered this “Japan Is Great” phenomenon. Analyzing issues surrounding nationalism and propaganda both in pre-war and contemporary Japan, he examines topics ranging from patriotic mobilization in pre-war and war-time Japan to post-war propaganda promoting nuclear energy. His most recent book, The Dystopia of “Japan Is Great”: The Genealogy of Singing One's Own Praises in Wartime (“Nihon sugoi” no disutopia: senjika jiga jisan no keifu, Seikyūsha, 2016) analyzes “precursors to the current ‘Japan Is Great!’ discourse” in publications between 1925 and 1945.