Toward a grammar of syntactic change (original) (raw)

Abstract

There is an extensive body of literature on the subject of formalized theories of phonolggy, morphology and semantic change, but regrettably little on the theory of syntactic change. An exaggerated picture of the situation may be given by such a textbook as Lehmann's Historical linguistics: an introduction (1962), which discusses genetic change, if only briefly, st every level of language other than the syntactic. All the same, the bias of this book is symptomatic (cf. the lack of syntactic material in Hoenigswald's Language change and linguistic reconstruction (1960)). The present article attempts partially to fill the gap from a transformational point of view and to point to some of '~he "kinds of change found in sentence structure excluding lexicon. Particular emphasis will be laid on the two processes that are usually considered the fundamental universals of linguistic change: simplification and elaboration. No attempt is made a.t all-inclusiveness. Only a limited number of possible types of change are discussed; it is unlikely, however, that other changes would prove to be of fundamentally different character. The observations and hypotheses put forward here can hopefully be tested against tl'e histories ot many different languages so that a universal granunar of syntactic change may eventually be developed. 'rhe examples here are all taken from the history of English. t) The conventional designations Old English (OE), Middle z) The bulk of the prirrmry data is selected from: (i) King All:ted's Orosius (c. 880). Ed. H. Sweet, EETS No. 79. Lolzdon, Kegsn Paul, 11383; (if) The works o/Geo//rcy Chaucer (latter half fourteenth century). Ed. F. N. Robinson. New York, Houghton Mifflin, 1957, 2.~d ed.; (iii) The complete worhs o/ Shakespeare (end of sixteenth, beginning of seventeenth centm-ies). Ed. H. Craig. Chicago, Sco~.. Foresman, 1951. Other quotations are selected from the following worxs' ~v) The romance o/ Sir Beues o/ Hamtoun (c. 1327). Ed. TOWARD A GRAMMAR OF SYNTACTIC CH.~,NGE

Figures (1)

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (57)

  1. REFERENCES [For the sake of brevity, the following abbreviation is used: PEGS--- Program /or the exchange o/ generative ,p~mmars. Washington, Center for at,plied linguistics.]
  2. A:3BOTT, E,. A., 1877. A Sha~espearean grammar. London, Macmillan. A~ Anglo.Saxon Dictionary and Supplemeat, 1954. Ed. J. Bosworth and T. N. Toiler. Oaford, Clarendon Press (re~,r.).
  3. ANDF.RSO~, J., 1968. 'Ergat:,.ve and nomin,-tive in English', JL 4, I-,32. BActLE., 1962. 'The order of elements in a transformational grammar of German', Lg 2,8, 263-6-9.
  4. BACQUET, P., 1962. La structure de la phrase verbals d l'dpoque Al/r~dienne. Paris, Les Belles Lettres.
  5. BLOOMFIELD, L., 1939. 'Menomini morphophonemics', TCLP 8, 105-15.
  6. BowzRs, J. S., 1967. 'Generic sentences in English', (unpub. paper).
  7. BOarD, J. C., and J. P. THO~NE, 1968. 'The deep grammax of modal verbs', {to appear-in JL; available as PEGS 31, April, 1968).
  8. CltOMSKY, 1Y[., 1965. Aspects o/the theory o/syntax. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
  9. CHOMSKY, IV., 1967. 'Some gener~.l properties of phonological rules', Lg 4,3, t 02-28.
  10. CHOMSKY, N., and M HALLI,.', 1968. The sound pattern o/English. New York, 7Iarper and Row.
  11. CL:~SS, Elizabeth, ; 965. 'Diachronic syntax and generative grammar'. Lg 41, ,102-15.
  12. COI.LINGE, N. E., forthcoming. Linguistic models: a h,~torian's use.
  13. DAM, J. VAN, 1957. The causal ctause and causal pre#osltlons in Early Old English prose. Groningen, Wolters.
  14. ELLEGARD, A., 1953. "rhe auxiliary do; the establishment and regulation of il:s use: in English', Gothenburg Studies in English 2. Stockholm, Almqvist & Wiksell.
  15. ENGBLOM, V., 1938. 'On the origin and development of the auxiliary do', Lurid Studies in English 6. Lurid, Sweden, Gleerup.
  16. FiL.r~orm, ,~. j., 1966. 'A proposal concerning English prepositions', Georgetown University liIonograph Series on Language and Linguistics 19, 19-33.
  17. FILLMOt~E, C. J., 1967. 'On the syntax of preverb.,¢, Gio~sa 1, 91-125.
  18. t'Ral~z, W., 1939 Die SFrache Shakespeares in Vers ~nd Pr~sa. Halle/Saale, Niemeyer, 4th ed.
  19. FU,'rKE, O., 1922. 'Die Ftigung ginnen mit dem Infinitiv im Mittelenglischen', Engli'.;che Studien 56, 1-27.
  20. GOMAI~, R. D., 1967. Toward a unified method o/describing langt, age change (unpub. M.A. thesis, Ohio State Univ. ; available as PEGS 13, Decernbe~, 11967).
  21. GaEg~rnEr~6, J. H., 1961. 'Some universals of grammar with particular refer- ence to the order of meaningful elements' in Univermls o/L.nguage. Ed. J. H. Greenberg. Cambr, dge Mass., MIT Press, 1966, 7~'~-113 2rid ed.
  22. GREENBERG, J. H., 1964. 'Language universai,~' i~ Cuwe,~t trends in linguistics 3: ghe~etic~l/oundations. Ed, Th. Sebeok. 's-Graver ~age, Mouton, 1966, 61-112.
  23. GREgNBi~RG, J. H., 1966. 'Sy~lchronic and diachronic uni'.ersals in phonology', Lg 42, 508-17.
  24. HALtaL M., 1961. 'On the :ole of simplicity ia linguist*: descriptions', Pro- d ceedings e/ the S)~mposi~ in applied mathematics t2: ~Ouc,~ure o/ language and its mathematical aspects. Ed. R. Jakobs,.~n. Provi, enee, Rl~ocle Island, American Mathematical Society. 89-94.
  25. HALLE, M., 1962. 'Phol~ology in generative grammaJ., Wo~d 18, ,';4-72 (t962), and (slightly ~evised) in The structure o/ lang'~age: readings tn the p~,ilosaphy o/ la,sguagr. Eds. J. A. Fodor and .i.J. Katz. New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, 1964, 334~52.
  26. HALLIDAY, 5f, A, K., 1967, 'Notes on transitivity and theme in English', JL 3, 37-81.
  27. HO~ZN1GSWALt), H M., 1960. Language change and linguistic reconstruction. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  28. HOt:mGSWALD, H. M., 1961. 'Are there universals of linguistic change?' in Universals of language. Ed. J. H. Greenberg. Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press, 1966, 30--52. 2nil ed.
  29. JI~SPERSEN, O., 1909-49. A Modern English grammar on historical principles, 7 vols. London, Allen and Lrnwin.
  30. KAT£, J. J.. and P. M. POSTAL, 1964. An int,,~grated theo:~y o! linguistic de- scriptdons. Cambridge, Mass., M1T Press.
  31. KtPARSKV, P., 1967. 'Apropos de l'histoire de l'accentuation grecque', La#gages 8, 73-93.
  32. l~.tr^asgv, P., 1968. 'LingaisUc universals and ! n~mstic change', in Universals in linguistic theory. Eds. E, Bach and R Harm.~ New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 170--202.
  33. KLI~A, E. S., 1964a. 'Negation in English', in The struct.,4re o/ language: readings in the. phdosophy ~¢ language. Eds. J. A. FoSor and J. J. Katz. New Jersey: Preaatice-Hall, 1964, 246-323.
  34. KLtMA, E. S., ! 964b, Relatedness between grammatical s estems', Lg 40, 1-20.
  35. KuRvtowlcz, J., iq62. On the methoda of internal reconstruction', in Proceedings o/ th~ nin,'h international congress o/ ling ,~ists. Ed, H. Lunt. 's-Gravenhage, Mcuton~ 1964, 9-36.
  36. LaKOFF, G., :965. 'On the nature of syntactm irregul trity', Mathematwal linguistics and auto natic translation, Report N o. NSF-16. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard Computation Laboratory.
  37. LAKOFF, G., 1966. 'A note, on negation', Mathematical and automatic trans- lation, Report No. NSF-*.7 Sect]ot~ 111. Camb'ddge, Ma~;s., Harvard Compu- tation Laborato~,.
  38. L~so~voz~, D. T., 1966 'The syntax of the English expletive "It"', Georgetown University ,~fonograph Series on Language and Linguistics 19, 207-16.
  39. LEHMA~N, W. P., 1962. Hi~torical linguistics: an int:'oduction. New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  40. ~[cCAWLeV, J. D., 1967. 'Why auxili~ries axe verbs', (unpub. paper).
  41. MCCAWLEY, J. D., 1968. 'Concerning the base component of a transfor- mational grammar', FL A., 243-69.
  42. Mi£.tle English Dictionary (1952-). Ed. H. Kurath and S. M. Kuhn. Ann Arbor, Univ. of Michigan Press.
  43. ~[oss]~, F., 1938. Histoire de la forme p~riphrastique Street participe pr/.sent en ge¢mam~lue. Paris, Klincksi,~k.
  44. Moss~, F., 1949--50. Manual dt l'anglais du moyen-dge: des orig~nes au XIVe s/~de. 2 vols. Paris, Aubier.
  45. MUSrANOJA, T. F., 1960. Middle English syntax. Helsinki, Societ6 Philologi- que. Ox~,~'d English Dictionary, 19,33. Ed. J. A. Murray. Oxford, Clarendon Press. POf.T~L, P. M., 1966. 'On ~,o-called "pronouns" in English', Georgetown l~o~ograph Series on Language and Linguistics 19, 177-206.
  46. QuxRs, R. and C. I,. WRENN, 1957. An Old English ~mmaro _London, ~.Vlethuen. 2nd ed.
  47. I,~OSJ~tmAUM, P. S. and Dorita LOCHAK, 1966. 'The IBM CORE grammar of 'English', in Specification and utilization of a transformational grammar, Scicatific Report I. Ed. D. Lieberman. Yorktown Heights, N.Y., IBM Corp., Thomas J. ~Natson Research Center.
  48. ~'~oss. J. R., 1967. 'Auxiliaries as main verbs', (unpub. paper). ,C;ALMON, V!ivian, 1%5. 'Sentence structure in colloquial Shakespeaxean English', TransactJ:ons o/~he Phil,dogical Society 105-40. ,';aI'OR'L~A, S., 1965. 'Ordered rules, dialect d~fference~, ~tnd historical processes', L; 41,218-24.
  49. Carlota S., 1%4, 'Determiners aud relative clauses in a generative grammax of English', Lg 40, 37-52.
  50. ',~'rocKWELL, R. P., 1964. 'Realism in historical ErLglish phonology', (unpub. paper delivered at LSA Winter Meeting, December, t964).
  51. Ts~R, K. V., 1962. 'Algonquian languages and genetic relationship' in Proceedings of the ninth international congress o/ linguists. Ed. It. Lunt. 's-Gravenhage, Mouton, 1964, 1026-34.
  52. TRAU(iOTZr, Elizabeth Closs, 1967. 'Deep and surface structure in Alfredian prose', (ur~pub p~per: available as PEGS 1.4, December, 1967).
  53. TR~V¢~oxT, Elizabeth Closs, 1968. 'Old English Grammar I' it, Comput,r exl~riments in transformational grammar, Report AF-33, CS-10& Ed. Jt)y,-e Friedman. Stanford, Stanford Univ. Computer Sciezice De- partment.
  54. TRAUC,OTT, Elizabeth Closs, and J. WATERHOUSE, 1968. 'Already and yet: a sr.pptetive set of aspect-rv arkers ?' (forthcoming in JL ; available as PEGS 3,!~, ~ay, 1968).
  55. UCLA, 19~:~7. A iv Force E~glish Syntax Con/erence, September ~967, Working Fape,,s, (unpub. Los Angeles Univ. of California at Los Angeles, Depart- ment of Linguistics).
  56. VISS~R, F. Th., 1963-66. An historical syntax o/t;w English lang.,~age. 2 vols. ]Leiden, Brill.
  57. W~,'.INnc~Icx, U., 1964. 'Explorations in semantic theory' in Current trends in ling~'~istic$ 3: t~oreticag ]oundations. Ed. Th. Sebeok. 's-Gravenhage, Mou- ton, 1966, 395-477.